Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

1963 Section 12 - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 23 2002

Raghu Forwarding Agency and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Aug-23-2002

Reported in: JT2002(8)SC340; (2003)12SCC272

High Court which shall be heard and decided only thereat.9. No order as to the costs. Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 12, 14, 5 - Condonation of delay - Writ petition filed by appellant - Partly allowed … time requisite for obtaining certified copy of the order appealed against within the meaning of Sub-section (2) of Section 12 of Limitation Act. Excluding the time lost in obtaining the certified copy of the impugned order, the appeal


Feb 03 1972

NaraIn Das and ors. Vs. the Improvement Trust, Amritsar and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Feb-03-1972

Reported in: AIR1972SC865; (1973)2SCC265; 1972(4)LC696(SC)

lay-out was formally approved by the Senior Planner and was finally approved by the Trust on January 31, 1963. The scheme as finally approved provided for the development of the vast area which was mostly unbuilt and … The appeal accordingly fails and is dismissed ; but in the circumstances of the case without costs. - Section 12(1) & Securities and Exchange Board of India (Stock Brokers and Sub-Brokers) Rules, 1992, Rule 3 & Securities and


Jan 20 1992

Smt. Jacintha Kamath Vs. K. Padmanabha Kamath

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jan-20-1992

Reported in: AIR1992Kant372; I(1992)DMC574; ILR1992KAR1233; 1992(2)KarLJ286

Act may, on a petition presented by either party thereto against the other, be declared as a nullity.14. Section 12 of the HM Act provides that any marriage solemnised, whether before or after the commencement of the Act, … appeal,23. In the result, this appeal fails and is dismissed without being admitted.24. Appeal dismissed. - LIMITATION ACT, 1963.[C.A. No. 36/1963]. Article 57: [N. Kumar, J] Applicability of Held, To apply Article 57 of the Limitation Act,


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 05 1995

Ramesh Govind Kulkarni Vs. Karnataka Appellate Tribunal

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jul-05-1995

Reported in: ILR1995KAR2063; 1995(5)KarLJ202

It is accordingly quashed. Writ Petitions are allowed to the extent indicated above but without costs. LIMITATION ACT, 1963 (Central Act No. 36 of 1963) - Section 12(2) - Exclusion of time for obtaining copy - If … Court in ascertaining or computing the prescribed period may be sufficient cause within the meaning of this section. Section 12: Exclusion of time in legal proceedings- (1) xxx xxx xxx (2) In computing the period of limitation for


Jan 23 2001

Riasat Ali Vs. Smt. Sayeeda Begum and Another

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-23-2001

Reported in: 2001IIAD(Delhi)501; 90(2001)DLT112; 2001(57)DRJ672; 2001RLR196

Courts had resumed work after the Summer Vacation.9. The Appeal is dismissed with costs of Rs.5000/-. Limitation Act, 1963- Section 5--Limitation--condensation of delay--Certified copy applied beyond the period of limitation and many days after summer vacation--Appeal dfsmissed. - … Judge had held that the 'party is as of right entitled to the exclusion of the time under Section 12 ......Thus, where the impugned order was passed on the last working day before vacation and the application for


Apr 05 2000

L.Rs. of Karan Singh Vs. Anirudh Sen

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Apr-05-2000

Reported in: 2000WLC(Raj)UC702; 2000(2)WLN128

within limitation and proceed in accordance with law. There shall be no costs of this appeal. Limitation Act, 1963 - Section 12(3)--Limitation--Exclusion of time in obtaining certified copies of judgment and decree--Judgment and decree passed by trial … filing the appeal in the present case in accordance with the provisions of limitation act keeping in view Section 12 of the said Act.4. Mr. Chhangani, learned Counsel appearing for the respondent urged that order rejecting appeal is


Apr 01 2005

Dr. Y. Nagappa Vs. P. Shanumakanagouda and ors.

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Apr-01-2005

Reported in: AIR2005Kant304; IV(2005)BC119; ILR2005KAR1687

below is directed to register the suit and dispose of the same in accordance with law. LIMITATION ACT, 1963 - SECTION 12 - Computing period of limitation - Money suit based on pro-note - Suit posted for … maintainable. This is impugned in this Petition.4. Learned counsel for the petitioner-plaintiff submitted that the Court-below without examining Section 12 of the Limitation Act and without affording an opportunity, dismissed the Suit as not maintainable. He cited a


Aug 25 1988

Nande and ors. Vs. Manga

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Aug-25-1988

Reported in: 1988(2)WLN244

decide the appeals on merits according to law. There will be no order as to costs. Limitation Act, 1963 - Section 12--Limitation--Computation of--Applied for copy of judgment on 22-10-1983 very date of decision--Copy received on 16 12-1983--Applied … of the time taken in obtaining the certified copy of the judgment It was also submitted that under Section 12 of the Limitation Act the appellants were entitled for the exclusion of time in obtaining the certified copies


Nov 07 2008

Suman Kapur Vs. Sudhir Kapur

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Nov-07-2008

Reported in: 2008AIRSCW7730; 2008(6)LHSC4081; AIR2009SC589; 2008(6)ALLMR(SC)937; 2009(1)AWC169(SC); 2008(57)BLJR187; 2009(1)BomCR88; II(2008)DMC774SC; (2009)1MLJ1345(SC); RLW2009(2)SC1954; 2008(14)SCALE404; (2009)1SCC4

No reason to interfere - Decree of divorce confirmed - Impugned Judgments upheld - Appeal disposed of - Section 12: [C.K. Thakker & D.K. Jain, JJ] Decree for divorce - Re-marriage by party Held, It is true that


May 12 2006

Ravinder Singh Gorkhi Vs. State of U.P.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: May-12-2006

Reported in: AIR2006SC2157; 2006CriLJ2791; 130(2006)DLT602(SC); JT2006(5)SC468; 2006(5)SCALE682; (2006)5SCC584; MANU/SC/8161/2006

author of the register has also not been examined. The register is not paged (sic) at all. Column 12 of the register deals with 'age at the time of admission'. Entries 1 to 45 mention the age … certificate purported to have been issued by the authorities of a primary school would attract the provision of Section 35 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 is in question in this appeal which arises out of a


Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial