From

1942 - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

Aug 19 2014

Rfa No. 1942 of 1991 (Oandm) Vs. Kali Charan and Others ... Appellants

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Aug-19-2014

VARINDER SINGH201408.20 16:56 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court at AT CHANDIGARH Chandigarh RFA No.1942 of 1991 (O&M) Date...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 12 1997

O. 1942 Cooperative Bank Represented by Its Secretary and ors. Vs. Dis ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Sep-12-1997

Reported in: (1998)1MLJ442

Matched in: Parties O. 1942 Cooperative Bank Represented by Its Secretary and ors. Vs. District Collector and ors.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 18 2013

Thiruvanchoor Service Co-operative Bank Ltd.No.1942 Vs. Sabu Thomas

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Jan-18-2013

THIRUVANCHOOR,KOTTAYAM REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.2. THE PRESIDENT, BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE THIRUVANACHOOR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED NO. 1942 THIRUVANCHOOR,KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN RESPONDENT(S)/PETITIONER AND 3RD RESPONDENT: ---------------------------------------------- 1. SABU THOMAS S/O.CL.K.UTHUP,CHAKKALAYIL HOUSE THIRUVANCHOOR P.O. KOTTAYAM

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works

Sep 29 2006

Lachhiram Chudiwala, H.U.F. Through Its Karta/Manager Shri T.L. Chudiw ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Sep-29-2006

Reported in: 2006(6)ALLMR431; 2006(6)BomCR559

Matched in: Parties Lachhiram Chudiwala, H.U.F. Through Its Karta/Manager Shri T.L. Chudiwala Vs. the Bank of Rajasthan Limited, a Banking Corporation Constituted Under the Provisions of Mewar Companies Act, 1942 and Deemed to Have Been Incorporated Under the Companies Act, 1956)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 20 1942

Lalbhai Fulchand Vs. the Ahmedabad Share and Stock Brokers' Associatio ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Aug-20-1942

Reported in: AIR1943Bom180; (1943)45BOMLR226

consider them.10. The appeal fails, and must be dismissed with costs.11. Rules in Civil Application No. 368 of 1942 discharged with costs.12. There will be only one set of costs.Wassoodew, J.13. I agree. Ahmedabad Share and Stock

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 22 1942