1936 - Judgment Search Results

Pallikkal Service Co-Operative Bank, Ltd No. D 1936 vs State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

THE 24TH DAY OF JANUARY 2024 / 4TH MAGHA, 1945 PETITIONER: PALLIKKAL SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK, LTD NO. D 1936 P.O. PALLIKKAL, MALAPPURAM. PIN 673634 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY SMT. SHYJA, PIN - 673634 K.K.DHEERENDRAKRISHNAN N.P.ASHA RESPONDENTS:1 STATE

U.P. Basic Shiksha Parishad Through Its Secretary and Basic Shiksha Ad ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 2006(3)AWC2992; [2006(109)FLR1101]; (2006)IIILLJ417All

(Annexure -1 of the writ petition) passed by Prescribed Authority under the provisions of Payment of Wages Act 1936 in P.W. Case No. 74 of 1991 Smt. Pramila Devi v. District Basic Education Officer, Jhansi and Ors.

Sulabh International Social Service Organisation (Branch U.P. State) V ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: [2008(118)FLR92]; (2008)IIILLJ652All

short ground that the impugned order is totally without jurisdiction as the provisions of Payment of Wages Act, 1936 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) are not at all attracted.2. Prem Chandra Jha, the contesting respondent No.

Shiv Shankar Lal Tiwari S/O Late Baldhari Lal Tiwari Vs. the Authority ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: [2008(119)FLR291]; (2009)ILLJ667All

A The petitioner workman filed claim application before the Prescribed Authority appointed under the Payment of Wages Act, 1936 under Section 15 of the Act for a direction for payment of his difference of wages along with

Gobinda Lal Sen and ors. Vs. Authority Under the Payment of Wages Act, ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (2002)3CALLT219(HC),[2002(95)FLR996]

Matched in: Parties Gobinda Lal Sen and ors. Vs. Authority Under the Payment of Wages Act, 1936 and ors.

Cwp No.8907 of 2014 Vs. Authority Appointed Under the Payment of Wages ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

2014 Date of decision: 09.05.2014 M/s Night Fashion ...Petitioner versus Authority appointed under the Payment of Wages Act, 1936, Circle-4, Faridabad ...Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE GURMEET SINGH SANDHAWALIA ***** Present: Mr.Vaibhav Sehgal, Advocate for the petitioner. ****

Cwp No.9003 of 2014 Vs. Authority Appointed Under the Payment of Wages ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

2014 Date of decision: 12.05.2014 M/s Night Fashion ...Petitioner versus Authority appointed under the Payment of Wages Act, 1936, Circle-4, Faridabad ...Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE GURMEET SINGH SANDHAWALIA ***** Present: Mr.Vaibhav Sehgal, Advocate for the petitioner. ****

Cwp No.9196 of 2014 Vs. Authority Appointed Under the Payment of Wages ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

2014 Date of decision: 14.05.2014 M/s Night Fashion ...Petitioner versus Authority appointed under the Payment of Wages Act, 1936, Circle-4, Faridabad ...Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE GURMEET SINGH SANDHAWALIA ***** Present: Ms.Shivya Sehgal, Advocate for the petitioner. ****

Madura Coats Ltd. Vs. Authority Under Payment of Wages Act, 1936 (Depu ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [2000(87)FLR805]; (2000)IILLJ945Mad

and 61 of 1991 on the file of the first respondent Authority under the Payment of Wages Act, 1936 and quash the order, dated October 31, 1992.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner-management has argued that due to

Bormah Jan Tea Co. (1936) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: [1999]240ITR477(Cal)

Matched in: Parties Bormah Jan Tea Co. (1936) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax