Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

1923 - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 03 2014

Cwp No. 1923 of 2014 Vs. the State of Punjab and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Feb-03-2014

CWP No.1923 of 2014 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.1923 of 2014 Date of decision : 03.02.2014 Jagga Singh ....Petitioner V/s The State of Punjab & ors....Respondents BEFORE :...


Aug 09 2017

M/S. Urja India vs.the Commissioner (Under Employees Compensation Act, ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Aug-09-2017

Date of Decision:09. h August, 2017 Through: None. ..... Appellant 1. versus THE COMMISSIONER (UNDER EMPLOYEES COMPENSATION ACT, 1923) & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Standing for BSES RPL with Counsel Mr.Arnav Vidyarthi, Ms.Anju Thomas,


Jul 29 2013

Present:- Mr. Lokesh Sinhal Advocate Vs. Commissioner under the Workme ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jul-29-2013

July 29, 2013 M/s Synergic Medical International, Sector 14, Gurgaon ......Petitioner Versus Commissioner under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, Circle 3, Gurgaon and another .......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE K. KANNAN Present:- Mr.Lokesh Sinhal, Advocate for the petitioner.


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 24 1928

In Re: Section 25, Paper Currency Act (10 of 1923)

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Apr-24-1928

Reported in: AIR1928All371

payable to bearer on demand offends (against) the provisions of Section 25, Paper Currency Act No. 10 of 1923.Is such a promissory note void and inadmissible in evidence and cannot be the basis of a claim in


Jan 19 1923

The Bandra City Municipality Vs. Dr. D.A. D'Month

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jan-19-1923

Reported in: AIR1923Bom407; 76Ind.Cas.478

Matched in: Parties The Bandra City Municipality Vs. Dr. D.A. D'Month (19.01.1923 - BOMHC)


Dec 18 1923

Babu Dwarka Dhish Prasad Singh Vs. the Hon'ble Maharaja Keshva Prasad ...

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Dec-18-1923

Reported in: AIR1924All398; 82Ind.Cas.1022

Piggott, J.1. The application before me is one presented on the 8th of September 1923, asking this Court to review an order of the 11th June 1923, according to which it was held


Oct 19 1923

Best and Co., Ltd., Agents of the Nobel's Explosives Co., Ltd. Vs. the ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-19-1923

Reported in: 79Ind.Cas.928; (1924)46MLJ217

Matched in: Parties Best and Co., Ltd., Agents of the Nobel's Explosives Co., Ltd. Vs. the Corporation of Madras (19.10.1923 - MADHC)


Oct 19 1923

Best and Co. Ltd. Agents of the Nobel's Explosive Co. Ltd. Vs. the Cor ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-19-1923

Reported in: (1924)ILR47Mad262

Matched in: Parties Best and Co. Ltd. Agents of the Nobel's Explosive Co. Ltd. Vs. the Corporation of Madras (19.10.1923 - MADHC)


Jan 17 1923

Mathoor Graman Rama Pattar's son Ramasami Pattar and Ors. Vs. Manukuri ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-17-1923

Reported in: 72Ind.Cas.627

Matched in: Parties Mathoor Graman Rama Pattar's son Ramasami Pattar and Ors. Vs. Manukurisi Variath Lakshmi Kuarassiar and Anr. (17.01.1923 - MADHC)


Aug 13 1923

O' Kambu Ammal Vs. J. Ranganathan

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Aug-13-1923

Reported in: AIR1924Mad624

Matched in: Parties O' Kambu Ammal Vs. J. Ranganathan (13.08.1923 - MADHC)


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial