Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

1908 Sections 9 - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 04 1991

Chaman Lal JaIn and anr. Vs. the State and anr.

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Jul-04-1991

Reported in: 1992CriLJ955; 1992(1)WLC76; 1991(2)WLN212; 1991(2)WLN259

of explosives. The case was registered for offences under Sections 3, 4 and 5 of Explosive Substances Act, 1908, Section 9(b) of Explosives Act, 1884 and Section 6 of Territorists and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (hereinafter


Apr 30 1958

Smt. Balwant Kunwar and ors. Vs. Addl. Munsiff, Dehra Dun and anr.

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Apr-30-1958

Reported in: AIR1959All7

proceedings under this Act shall be regulated, as far as may be, by the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.' Section 9 lays down that, if the petitioner makes out a case, the District Court may decree restitution … marriage was solemnized or the husband and wife reside or last resided together.'It may be noted that both Sections 9 and 19 emphasize that, a petition for restitution of conjugal rights ought to be presented to the district


Dec 11 2014

Ravindra Harshad Parmar Vs. Dimple Ravindra Parmar

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Dec-11-2014

of the case. We shall now consider the effect of section 9-A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Section 9-A is reproduced below: "Section 9-A. Where at the hearing of application relating to interim relief in … by the Family Court Pune in a petition filed by the Respondent-wife seeking divorce under the provisions of Section 13(1)(ia), 25 and 26 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (the Act). The impugned order is passed on


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 02 2010

Surendra Kumar Choudhary. Vs. State of Bihar.

Court: Patna

Decided on: Nov-02-2010

writ application is accordingly allowed. [Markandey Katju ; Gyan Sudha Misra, JJ.] - Code of Civil Procedure (C.P.C.) 1908 - Section 151 - Saving of inherent powers of Court -- This appeal has been filed against the … have no right to hold a Hat over the C.S. Plot No. 9, which is adjacent to Plot Nos. 10, 11, 12 and 21, where … the sake of argument, that the petitioner had acquired an occupancy right and the rent was commutated under Section 40, the petitioner cannot claim unfettered right to cause deterioration of the lands in question. It has been


Dec 14 2007

Venkataraman @ Murali @ Raja, Vs. R. Venugopal and R. Ganesan @ Vinaya ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-14-2007

Reported in: (2008)2MLJ348

2.47. In : AIR1960Cal623 Jatindra Mohan Banerjee v. Kali Charan @ Kalipada Sarkar it is held thusCivil P.C. (1908), Sections 146, 47, Order 21 Rule 32 - Representative suit - Decree for injunction - Execution against parties not … ORDERM. Venugopal, J.1. The Civil Revision Petitioners herein are the respondents in Execution Petition No. 90 of 2002 on the file of the learned Principal District Munsif, Pondicherry. 2. Before the lower Court, the


Mar 02 1967

Arunachalam Pillai Vs. M. Velamma and ors.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-02-1967

Reported in: (1967)2MLJ490

or arrest the running of time, against the provisions of Section 9 of the Limitation Act (IX of 1908). Section 9 provides only that once time has begun to run, no subsequent disability or inability to sue, … in suspension of the original cause of action or arrest the running of time, against the provisions of Section 9 of the Limitation Act (IX of 1908). Section 9 provides only that once time has begun to


Mar 24 2000

The Commissioner, Bangalore Development Authority, Bangalore Vs. State ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Mar-24-2000

Reported in: 2000(6)KarLJ204

Acts/Rules/Orders:Civil Procedure Code, 1908 - Section 9;Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 - Sections 36 and 64;Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4,


Feb 24 1998

M. Lakshmi Devi Vs. M. Lakshmi Devi and Others

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Feb-24-1998

Reported in: 1999(4)KarLJ33

Acts/Rules/Orders:Family Courts Act, 1984 - Sections 7(1) Explanation and 8;Civil Procedure Code, 1908 - Sections 9, 96 and 107;Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 59Cases Referred:Ram Chandra v. Muneshwar and Others, AIR 1962 All.


Aug 03 2023

Joy Mathew vs State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Aug-03-2023

He is being proceeded against for having committed offences punishable under Sections 5 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908 & Section 9(B)(I)(b) of the Explosives Act.2. On his failure to promptly appear before the learned SessionsJudge, the


May 02 2025

Sri.Rudra vs State of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: May-02-2025

byRamapura Police Station, Chamarajanagar, for the offences punishable under Sections 4 and 5 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908, Sections 9(B) and 1(b) of the Explosives Act, 1884 and Section 325 of the BNS, 2023, are before this


Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial