19 5 - Judgment Search Results
Date of Decision:19.5.2014 Vs. Union of India and Others
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-19-2014
CWP No.988 of 2012 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.988 of 2012(O&M) Date of decision:19.5.2014 Subedar Manjit Singh ….Petitioner VERSUS Union of India and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE...
Date of Decision:19.5.2014 Vs. Central Administrative Tribunal and Oth ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-19-2014
of Rule 2.2 (b) of the Punjab Civil Service (Pension) Rules remained unsuccessful in an application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985. The petitioner while working as Superintending Engineer (Electrical).Engineering Department, U.T.Chandigarh was subjected … whereby challenge to an order passed by the Administrator, Union Territory, Chandigarh on 23.03.2009 imposing a penalty of 5% cut in pension in terms of Rule 2.2 (b) of the Punjab Civil Service (Pension) Rules remained unsuccessful
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free