19 2 - Judgment Search Results
Lakshmi Ganesh Films and ors. Vs. Government of A.P. and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-21-2006
Reported in: 2006(4)ALD374
Constitution.15. Article 19(1)(a) provides that all citizens shall have the right to freedom of speech and expression. Article 19(2) reads:Nothing in sub-clause (a) of Clause (1) shall affect the operation of any existing law, or prevent the … under Article 19(1)(a) and the permissible extent of restrictions that may be placed upon the right qua article 19(2).21. The provisions of Section 8 not having been challenged, the validity of this provision is an uncontested assumption
Manoj Vs. Savita
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-17-2002
Reported in: 2003CriLJ3087
1218/2000, pending in the Court of J.M.F.C. Jabalpur, this petitioner has challenged not only the aforesaid order dated 19-2-2001, but also seeks quashment of aforesaid criminal case, after being unsuccessful in his Crl. Rev. No. 307/2001, which
Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. S.S. Bawa and anr.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Apr-18-2006
Reported in: (2006)143PLR590
in view of the provisions contained in Rule 12(3) of the Central Civil Services (Leave Travel Concession) Rules, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as 'the LTC Rules'). He was informed that under the aforesaid Rule, a Government Servant … S.S. Nijjar, J.1. The Union of India has filed this writ petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 13.1.2006 (Annexure P-3) passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal,
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Hamsa Vs. Food Inspector
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Mar-23-2005
Reported in: 2005(2)KLT998
this Criminal Revision Petition is whether or not the petitioner is entitled for the benefit guaranteed under Section 19(2) of the Prevention of Adulteration Act.2. The brief facts of the prosecution case are as follows:- On 10.11.1989
Modern Threads (i) Ltd. Vs. Employees State Insurance Corporation
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: May-01-2003
Reported in: RLW2003(3)Raj1977; 2003(3)WLC583
in the present case are wages within the meaning of Section 2(22) of The Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act of 1948') and if so, the appellant is enjoined to pay contribution
Smt. Barfi Devi and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jan-20-1997
Reported in: 1997CriLJ2152; 1997(2)WLC142
601 dt. 1-4-89 that it was purchased by him from M/s. Santosh Kumar Maganlal Khabia, Kushalgarh accused No. 2 Shri Rajnikant. M/s. Santosh Kumar Maganlal Khabia further stated to have purchased the mustard oil by bill No. … magistrate, Kushalgarh in criminal regular case No. 626/91 Under Section 7 r/w 16 Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 (hereinafter in short the Act). The petitioners have prayed that the proceedings of the aforesaid case against them;
Dr. Vineet Singh and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Dec-22-1998
Reported in: AIR1999Raj187; 1999(1)WLC667
for being selected in P.G. Course from 50% to 33% in the Pre-P.G. Entrance Examination in the year 1998 for admission to M.D./M.S./Diploma Course.2. The University of Rajasthan had laid down the eligibility conditions for the said
General Manager, Western Railway and ors. Vs. Authority Under Payment ...
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-06-1992
Reported in: (1994)ILLJ1066Raj; 1993(1)WLC641
excluded by virtue of the provisions of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 (for short 'the Act of 1985'). 2. An application under Section 15(2) of1936 Act was filed by respondent No. 2 before the Authority appointed under … District Court to hear Appeals against an order passed under Section 15 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936 (for short 'the Act of 1936') by a competent authority stands excluded by virtue of the provisions of
Mallanna Vs. Abdul Nabi and ors.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-24-1985
Reported in: AIR1986Kant221; ILR1985KAR3835; 1985(2)KarLJ364
years i.e. up to 9-2-1963. The two Courts below have held that the plaintiff executed Exhibit D5 on 19-2-1960 i.e. ten days immediately after the last mortgage deed dated 9-2-1960.4. Exhibit D-5 is in Urdu. Its true
Kamlabai W/O Manoharlalji Vs. Manoharlal S/O Mangilalji Lalwani and or ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-16-1990
Reported in: 1991(0)MPLJ342
challenge the order dated 31-8-1987, passed by the Addl. Sessions Judge, Neemuch, in Criminal Revision No. 129 of 1987, thereby upholding the order dated 21-4-1987, passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Neemuch, in Criminal Case No. … by the Addl. Sessions Judge, Neemuch, in Criminal Revision No. 129 of 1987, thereby upholding the order dated 21-4-1987, passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Neemuch, in Criminal Case No. 20 of 1986, holding the complaint
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free