Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

1898 Sections 350 1 - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 13 1971

Maniam Palanisami Gounder Vs. P. Karuppa Gounder

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jul-13-1971

Reported in: AIR1972Mad243

106, 107 and 108 of Madras Village Panchayats Act, 1950, Sections 80 and 197 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 and Section 19 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - appeal against decision of Court below on question of … other statutes as well, one such being the District Municipalities Act 1920 (Madras Act V of 1920). Section 350(1) of that Act is as follows:--'350(1) No suit for damages or compensation shall be instituted against the municipal


Sep 15 1949

In Re: Gadiraju Narayanaraju and ors.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Sep-15-1949

Reported in: AIR1952Mad790; (1952)IIMLJ141

entitled to a de novo trial.13. The result is the petition fails and isdismissed. Criminal - successor - Sections 350, 350 (1) and 526 (8) of Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 - petition against conviction - petitioner contended that


Oct 24 1934

In Re: Edward Philbert

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-24-1934

Reported in: 159Ind.Cas.663

to embody this direction in this order. This petition is otherwise dismissed. Criminal Procedure Code (Act V of 1898), Section 350 - Transfer of Magistrate after framing of charge--Successor re-hearing evidence--Accused, whether entitled to further opportunity of … Court to grant copies of the statements made by the witnesses for the prosecution to the appellant under Section 162 of the Criminal Procedure Code has not been obeyed.2. As regards the first point the facts of … made by the witnesses for the prosecution to the appellant under Section 162 of the Criminal Procedure Code has not been obeyed.2. As regards the


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 05 1916

In Re: Savarimuthu Pillai and ors.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-05-1916

Reported in: 33Ind.Cas.646

the records should be returned to the District Magistrate.Napier, J.8. I agree. Criminal Procedure Code (Act V of 1898), Sections 350, 366 and 367 - Judgment, when complete--Judgment written and signed by owe Magistrate, whether can be pronounced by … ORDERWilliam Ayling, J.1. This case (Calendar Case No. 716 of 1915) on the file of the 2nd class Magistrate of Dindigul was tried by Mr. D.K. Venkateswara Aiyar who


Aug 25 1914

Tanguturi Sriramitlu and ors. Vs. Nalam Krishna Row and ors.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Aug-25-1914

Reported in: 25Ind.Cas.1001

further inquiry. His order to that effect must consequently be set aside. Criminal Procedure Code (Act V of 1898), Sections 350, 253(2), 258 - Trial re-commenced under Section 350--Charge, whether cancelled--Discharge--Acquittal. - … as one of acquittal and the District Magistrate's order for further inquiry must be set aside.Tyabji, J.7. Section 350 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code provides for the re-summoning and re-hearing of the witnesses and the re-commencement of


Feb 20 1920

In Re: Yeluchuri Venkatachennaya and ors.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Feb-20-1920

Reported in: (1920)38MLJ370

JJ., which I have had the advantage of reading, as to the effect of the proviso to Section 350 read with Section 117, and will only add that in my opinion trial generally means the determination of … to the effect of the proviso to Section 350 read with Section 117, and will only add that in my opinion trial generally means the … undoubtedly arises between the Crown and the accused as to whether he should be dealt with under the sections, and I see no sufficient reason why the determination of that issue should not be regarded as a


Oct 10 1951

Surat Borough Municipality Vs. Nagindas Maganlal

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Oct-10-1951

Reported in: AIR1953Bom29; (1952)54BOMLR800; ILR1953Bom4

order of conviction and sentence recorded by the trial Magistrate.[10] Conviction upheld. Criminal Procedure Code (Act V of 1898), Sections 263, 264, 350, 354, 355--Summary trial - Evidence partly recorded by Magistrate and notes of evidence made part … Stipendiary Thirst Class Magistrate. Surat, for an offence under Section 4 (l) (b), Bombay Prevention of Adulteration Act, 193-5. Upon the evidence adduced, the learned Magistrate convicted the accused under Section 4 (l) (b) of the Act


Aug 25 1914

T. Sriramulu and Three ors. Vs. K. Veerasalingam

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Aug-25-1914

Reported in: (1915)ILR38Mad585

effect must consequently be set aside. Autrefois acquit - Charge framed--Further inquiry ordered--Criminal Procedure Code (Act V of 1898), Sections 253(2), 350 and 437. - - There appears to be no direct authority of this or any other … recommenced the enquiry under Section 350 of the Criminal Procedure Code, examined the complainant as prosecution witness No. 1, and then passed an order of discharge under Section 253(2).3. Mr. Rosario contends that a charge having once


Apr 21 1955

The State Vs. Ramniranjan and anr.

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Apr-21-1955

Reported in: AIR1955All506; 1955CriLJ1230

by preceding Magistrate - Sub Section 2 of Section 346 and Section 350 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 - Magistrate hearing a case already heard by another - to hear all evidence produced before him - … Upadhya, J.: 1. This is a reference by the Addl. Sessions Judge of Banaras at … case originally started on the complaint, of one Sub Karan filed against the accused and some others under Section 498/109, I. P. C. The case came up for hearing before Shri Jagdeo Prasad, Magistrate, Second Class Jaunpur,


Apr 04 1968

Reserve Bank Employees Association, Nagpur Vs. State of Maharashtra an ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Apr-04-1968

Reported in: AIR1969Bom199; (1969)71BOMLR99; 1969CriLJ711; ILR1969Bom804; 1968MhLJ725

Magistrate who has previously heard the case, ceases to exercise jurisdiction and is succeeded by another Magistrate. Section 350 (1) provides:'Whenever any Magistrate, after having heard and recorded the whole or any part of the evidence in an … of the evidence on record. The application stands dismissed. GGM/D.V.C.10. Petition dismissed. Criminal Procedure Code (Act V of 1898), Sections 263, 264, 355, 330 - Evidence or substance thereof recorded by Magistrate in summary or regular trial--Whether such


Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial