1890 - Judgment Search Results

The Queen-Empress Vs. O'Hara

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (1890)ILR17Cal643

Matched in: Citation (1890)ILR17Cal643

Union of India Vs. M/S. K.D. Krishan Lal

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2001ACJ1748; 1999IVAD(Delhi)740; AIR1999Delhi349; 80(1999)DLT412; 1999(50)DRJ446; ILR1999Delhi38

plaintiff. It was also contended that the defendant was protected under Section 77(2) of the Indian Railway Act, 1890. The Civil Court framed the following issues:- 1. Whether the plaintiff is a registered partnership firm and the

Melethil Iyyathiya Umma Vs. the Taluk Land Board

Court: Kerala

Reported in: 2007(2)KLT657

declarant to surrender 77.14 acres of surplus land. Asdeclarant died by that time, his legal heirs filed C.R.P. 1890/86 and persons claimed to be tenants in CRP 1891/86 before this Court. It was contendedthat Taluk Land Board

Yusuf Abdul Gani, Sole Proprietor of Jumbo Offshore Enterprises Vs. Ge ...

Court: Mumbai

and grant relief to the Plaintiff. He submitted that this Court under the Colonial Court of Admiralty Act, 1890 read with the Colonial Courts of Admiralty (India) Act, 1891 read with Section 22 (1) (a) (xii) of

Union of India, Owning and Representing the Central Railway Through th ...

Court: Mumbai Nagpur

the defence of improper packing of consignment by the respondent. 9] Section 73 of the Indian Railways Act 1890 casts responsibility upon the railway administration as carrier of animals and of goods, for the loss, destruction, damage,

Prabhu Chand Ram Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through the General Manager, ...

Court: Patna

from Barh to Patna Junction lost their lives.2. On 17.8.1990, under Section 82A of the Indian Railways Act, 1890, the said Prabhu Chand Ram filed two separate applications for compensation for the accident in question before the

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Gopal Jee

Court: Patna

the appellant on a pleading that the appellant was protected by Section 77B of the Indian Railways Act, 1890 and hence the claim of the consignor was not maintainable.4. Section 73 of the Act lays down the

Unio of India (Uoi) Vs. Gopal Jee

Court: Patna

resisted by the appellant pleading that the appellant was produced by Section 77-B of the Indian Railway Act, 1890 and hence the claim of the consignor was got maintainable.4. Section 73 of the Act lays down the

Kashi Prasad and anr. Vs. Mathura Prasad and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1926All145

1. This is an appeal in the execution department. It appears that on 19th March 1923, Babu Mathura Prasad and Harbans Prasad made an application for execution against the appellants here, namely, Kashi Prasad and Madan...

Pournima Suryakant Pawar and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra, and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

the oldest record i.e. school record of Shri Tukaram Thakar, great grandfather of the petitioners dated 1st August, 1890 recorded his caste as ‘Bhat’. The decision rendered by the Committee in both the cases, being arbitrary, was