1888 - Judgment Search Results

Ajithkumar.M.R. (Badge No. 1888) vs Sri. B.Andrew Prabhu,

Court: Kerala

IN WP(C)NO. 13160 OF 2015 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS 40 & 41: 1 AJITHKUMAR.M.R. (BADGE NO. 1888),AGED 62 YEARS S/O RAVINDRANATHAN.M.S, DY.ENGINEERING MANAGER, HINDUSTAN INSECTICIDES LTD, UDYOGAMANDAL-683501, PF NO-1156 UAN NO-10007643228, RESIDING AT H 18,

Shri K.D. Pendse Vs. Brihan Mumbai Mahanagar Palika, a Statutory Body ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2003(2)BomCR457

Matched in: Parties Shri K.D. Pendse Vs. Brihan Mumbai Mahanagar Palika, a Statutory Body Incorporated Under the B.M.C. Act 1888,

Prakash J. Shah Vs. Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay (a Corpora ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2008(4)ALLMR775; (2008)110BOMLR2034

Advocate appearing for the Appellant submitted that the notice under Section 351 of the Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 was for alleged unauthorised work, work of brick walls and flagged stones and where as the Appellants specific

In Re: Inventions and Designs Act, 1888; in Re: an Alleged Invention o ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (1896)ILR23Cal702

the petitioner, John Carapiet Galstaun, applied for and obtained under Section 30 of the Inventions and Designs Act, 1888, a rule calling upon Ernest Angelo Short to show cause why this Court should not declare that an

The Municipal Corporation of Brihanmumbai a Statutory Corporation Cons ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2006(3)ALLMR338; 2006(3)BomCR557

No. 312 of 2000-2001 was issued by the Corporation under Section 167 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 (for short, `the Act') in respect of the year 2000-2001 stating that the assessment has been amended in

Mangaldas N. Verma Charitable Trust by It Managing Trustee, Mrs. Sarla ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2006(3)ALLMR405; 2006(5)BomCR342; 2006(3)MhLj662

against the dismissal of Municipal Appeal No.186 of 1986 under section 2(1)(ix) of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 by the Additional Chief Judge, Bombay by order dated 30th July, 1988. 2. The facts which are not

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay, a Statutory Corporation C ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2008(4)ALLMR806; 2008(5)BomCR546

Matched in: Parties The Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay, a Statutory Corporation Constituted Under the Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 Through Its Bombay Electric Supply and Transport Undertaking Vs. Mrs. Shailaja D. Mhatre and the Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission, a Commission Constituted Under Section 16 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986

Kedarnath Construction Co. Through Its Proprietor, Gopalsingh Deora Vs ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2009(4)BomCR14

Matched in: Parties Kedarnath Construction Co. Through Its Proprietor, Gopalsingh Deora Vs. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, a Corporation Constituted Under the Provisions of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 and ors.

Namdev Pandurang Panchal Vs. Mumbai Municipal Corporation of Greater B ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2005(4)ALLMR689; 2006(1)BomCR680; 2006(1)MhLj194

Matched in: Parties Namdev Pandurang Panchal Vs. Mumbai Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay, a Corporation Duly Incorporate Under Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 and Conwood Developers Registered Under the Indian Companies Act, 1956

Esteem Properties Pvt. Ltd., a Company Incorporated Under the Companie ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2009(1)BomCR642; 2009(1)MhLj638

Matched in: Parties Esteem Properties Pvt. Ltd., a Company Incorporated Under the Companies Act, 1956 Vs. the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, a Body Corporate Constituted Under the Municipal Corporation Act, 1888,