18 2 - Judgment Search Results

Huf of H.H. Late Sir J.M. ScIndia Vs. Acit, Range - 18(2)

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

order that report (translation) of the Inam Commission was furnished to show that as far back as 01/12/ 1885 the land was recorded as Inam land which was received by way of choli bangdi. However, there was … of land at Aundh had given rise to capital gain exigible to tax. Assessee filed the return on 27/06/1997 declaring income at Rs. 7,98,51,710/-. Assessment was completed under Section 143(l)(a) on 19/02/1998 accepting the returned income. Subsequently

Date of Decision: 18.2.2013 Vs. M/S Mahajan Steel Rolling Mills Pvt Lt ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

of law arises for consideration. Therefore, the present appeal is dismissed. (HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE (TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA) JUDGE 18 2.2013 preeti

Date of Decision: 18.2.2013 Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

the above, the present writ petition is allowed and the order dated 27.6.1992, Annexure P-3, is quashed. February 18, 2013 (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) gbs JUDGE … -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.9597 of 1992 Date of Decision:18. 2.2013 Jagdish Kumar and others ....Petitioners. Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR

Date of Decision:18.2.2014 Vs. Additional Director Consolidation Harya ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

a petition under Section 42 of the Act, copy of which has been appended as Annexure Diwakar Gulati 2014.02.24 13:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP No.6271 of 1994 2 P-3 with

Date of Decision: 18.2.2014 Vs. State of Punjab Etc

Court: Punjab and Haryana

COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.16398 of 2013 (O&M) Date of Decision: 18.2.2014 Naveen Kumar etc .....Petitioner(s) Versus State of Punjab etc ....Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH Present: Mr.Rajeev Dev

Date of Decision:18.2.2014 Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

CWP No.2963 of 2014 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.2963 of 2014 Date of decision:18.2.2014

Date of Decision: 18.2.2014 Vs. Roop Polymers Ltd. and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.1201 of 2014 (O&M) Date of Decision: 18.2.2014 Punjab National Bank ....Petitioner Versus Roop Polymers LTD.And others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE RAJIV NARAIN RAINA Present :

Sudhir G. Borgaonkar Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle ...

Court: Mumbai

Matched in: Parties Sudhir G. Borgaonkar Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle 18(2)

Harshad L. Thakker Vs. Asst. Cit, Circle-18(2)

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2005)3SOT227(Mum.)

Court rendered in the case of Pullangode Rubber Produce Co. Ltd. v. State of Kerala (1973) 91 ITR 18 (SC). On the other hand, the learned departmental Representative simply supported the orders of the lower authorities but … Account was worked out to Rs. 14,42,082 while the stock as per the inventory prepared amounted to Rs. 22,45,941. Thus, according to the survey party, there was excess stock of Rs. 8,03,859. The statement of the assessee