Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

17 2 - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 17 2014

Date of Decision: 17.2.2014 Vs. Inderjit Singh and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Feb-17-2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.1171 of 2014 (O&M) Date of Decision: 17.2.2014 Nirmal Singh ....Petitioner Versus Inderjit Singh and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE RAJIV NARAIN RAINA Present : Mr.Mandeep


Feb 17 2014

Date of Decision:17.2.2014 Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Feb-17-2014

CWP No.2475 of 2014 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.2475 of 2014 Date of decision:17.2.2014


Feb 17 2014

Date of Decision: 17.2.2014 Vs. Darshan Lal and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Feb-17-2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.908 of 2014 (O&M) Date of Decision: 17.2.2014 Radha Krishan Mandir &Anr....Petitioners Versus Darshan Lal and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE RAJIV NARAIN RAINA Present :


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 25 2006

Anewera Marketing (P) Ltd. Vs. Assistant Cit, Range 17(2)

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on: Jan-25-2006

confirming the action of the assessing officer, wherein the assessing officer had initiated reassessment proceeding and completed reassessment. 2. The learned ACIT erred in confirming the action of the assessing officer insofar as the assessing officer has … into a company, it was only a succession of the firm by a company as held in Section 170 of the Income Tax Act. It is also so held by Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial