15 A - Judgment Search Results

“15. as Rightly Pointed out by the Learned Counsel Appearing for the ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

been made. Under the said Rules, there were only benefit of reservation of seats to the tune of 15% initially. However, vide amendment dated 08.06.2004, the period of Military service from 26.10.1962 to 09.01.1968 was to be

“15. Pw1 Chhote Lal Has Stated That the Suit Property Has Vs. Hira L ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

relied on the evidence of PW1,PW2 and PW3. The findings recorded by the learned FiRs.Appellate Court in para 15 of its judgment reads as under: “15. PW1 Chhote Lal has stated that the suit property has not

“15.it Is Wholly Unlikely That the Accused Would Make Extra- Vs. Sta ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Department of Forensic Medicine, PGIMS, Rohtak conducted post mortem examination on the dead body of Sukha Singh on 15.9.2009 and the report Ex.PA submitted by him contained following observations:- “Received charred human remains comprising of following: i)

“15. Now the Real Controversy Between the Vs. Iqbal Singh

Court: Punjab and Haryana

dismissing his appeal filed against the aforesaid judgment and decree of the trial Court. Singh Rattan Pal 2014.05.19 15:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab & Haryana High Court Rs.No.4837 of 2013

Murugesar and 15 Others Vs. Ramalakshmi

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2000(4)CTC468; I(2001)DMC196

Matched in: Parties Murugesar and 15 Others Vs. Ramalakshmi

Special Thasildar-15, Land Acquisition Vs. P.R. Govindarajalu

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1989)2MLJ402

Land Acquisition Act, 1894 hereinafter referred to as 'the Act', have been preferred by the Special Tahsildar No. 15, Land Acquisition, Neyveli-2, against the order passed by the Sub-Court, Cuddalore, in LA.O.P. Nos. 113 and 112 of

P. No. 15 of 1998

Court: Authority for Advance Rulings

Reported in: (1999)235ITR565AAR

employees of a Canadian company and its subsidiaries were offered shares in the parent company at a price 15 per cent, below the then market price.Under the terms of the offer, the purchase price of the shares

Kadoma Trading 15 (Pty) Ltd. Vs. Noble Crest Cc

Court: South Africa Supreme Court of Appeal

failed, for a period of more than six months, to lodge an annual return in compliance with s 15A or if the Registrar has reasonable cause to believe that a corporation is not carrying on business or

Bhaskaran Babu & 28 Others vs Ramanujan Mahesan & 15 Others

Court: Kerala

RAMANANDAN AMBIKA ..2.. ,13 KRISHNAN SUBHADRA RESIDING AT CHITTAZHIKATHUVEEDU, KADAKKAVOOR VILLAGE. 14 SREEDHARAN SUMA VAYALILVEEDU, KADAKKAVOOR VILLAGE, KADAKKAVOOR. 15 SREEDHARA SUDHA 16 VELU AMBUJAKSHI CHAMAVILA, KADAKKAVOOR VILLAGE, KADAKKAVOOR. 17 GANGADHARAN SUGHANDHI 18 GANGADHARAN SNEHALATHA 19 GANGADHARAN SULABHA

ici India Ltd. Vs. Dcit, Sr-15

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata

Reported in: (2004)90ITD258(Kol.)

"(3) That the Learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeal) has erred in concluding that interest is leviable under Section 155 of the IT Act for recall of Investment Allowance claim granted to the Company in the earlier years."