15 3 - Judgment Search Results
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Business Ward Xv(3) Vs. M/S. Sanghvi a ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-01-2012
in deciding that there need not be any cap of 10% for flats having built up area exceeing 1500 sq.ft. with regard to claim for deduction u/s.80IB of the Act?" 3. In the course of the hearing
Date of Decision:15.3.2012 Vs. State of Punjab
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-15-2013
In the present case, the appellant was convicted and sentenced by the trial Court for offence under Section 15 of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”.) and ordered to … the appellant the appeal abate qua fine also?. In this context, it would be relevant to examine section 394 of Cr.P.C.which deals with the provision of abatement of appeal and it reads as under: "394. Abatement of
Date of Decision: 15.3.2013 Vs. Munshi Ram
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-15-2013
passed by the learned FiRs.Appellate Court which may warrant interference in the present appeal. Dismissed. (HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE 15 3.2013 preeti
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Date of Decision: 15.3.2013 Vs. M/S Mohinder Pal and Sons and Another
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-15-2013
substantial question of law has been framed by the appellants not arises for consideration. Dismissed. (HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE 15 3.2013 preeti
Date of Decision: 15.3.2013 Vs. Vs.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-15-2013
any error apparent on record, which may warrant review or modification of the order. Dismissed. (HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE 15 3.2013 preeti
Date of Decision: 15.3.2013 Vs. M/S Sant Ram Raja Ram
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-15-2013
to any substantial questions of law requiring intervention of this court in second appeal. Dismissed. (HEMANT GUPTA) JUDGE 15 3.2013 preeti
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free