15 1 - Judgment Search Results

Replika Press Private Limited and anr Vs. Assistant Commissioner of In ...

Court: Delhi

01.2013 WP(C) 13838/2009 REPLIKA PRESS PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANR ... Petitioners versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 15 1) NEW DELHI ... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Mr S. Krishnan For

Date of Decision: 15.1.2014 Vs. Punjab State Co-operative Supply and M ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

is no merit, therefore, the instant revision petition filed by the petitioners is hereby dismissed as such. Sd/- 15.1.2014 (Mehinder Singh Sullar) AS Judge Arvind Kumar Sharma 2014.01.17 17:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of

Date of Decision: 15.1.2014 Vs. Director, Land Records, Punjab and Ano ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.516 of 2014 Date of decision: 15.1.2014 Naranjan Singh ….Petitioner VERSUS Director, Land Records, Punjab and another .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA HON’BLE Mr.JUSTICE

Gerard Perir Vs. The Income-Tax Officer, Range XV(1), Chennai

Court: Chennai

categorically held that such interest income is not entitled to the relief under Section 80HHC of the Act." 15. Learned standing counsel for the Income-Tax Department submitted that decision of the Kerala High Court in Ravindranathan Nair's … (Prayer: Tax Case Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order made in I.T.A.No.3094/Mds/2004, dated 21.09.2006.) S. Manikumar, J. 1. Tax Case Appeal is directed against

Loona Ram and ors. Vs. Authority Appointed Under S. 15(1) Payment of W ...

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: AIR1962Raj173; (1963)IILLJ56Raj

an application to the Authority under the Payment of Wages Act, 1936 (Act IV of 1936) under Section 15(2) praying for recovery of their unpaid wages, as set out above. This application was opposed by Gopal Singh, … was necessary. The grievance of the petitioners was that Gopal Singh had paid them their Wages upto July, 1958, but failed to pay the same for the month of August, 1958, with the result that a sum