147 2 - Judgment Search Results
The Divisional Manager, New India Assurance Company Ltd., Rep. by Its ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-31-2005
Reported in: III(2005)ACC104; 2006ACJ1533; ILR2005KAR1711; 2005(3)KarLJ416
recover the same from the owner of the vehicle in question. Accordingly, he submitted that as per Section 147(2) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, the liability of the insurer is only in respect of the damage to
New India Assurance Company Limited, Bangalore Vs. B.V. Paramesh and O ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-23-2000
Reported in: 2001ACJ913; 2001(4)KarLJ173
Insurance Company Limited , wherein, it is clearly observed as follows: 'Motor Vehicles Act (59 of 1988), Sections 147, 2(21), 2(14) --Liability of insurer -- Light motor vehicle -- Cannot always mean a light goods carriage --
C.K. Seetharam Vs. Jayalakshmamma and ors.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-04-1997
Reported in: II(1998)ACC7; 1999ACJ1569
fact that the occurrence did take place on 10.7.1989 the law applicable would be the law under Section 147 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and not the provision of law of 1939 Act. She submitted that … the respondent No. 1 National Insurance Co. Ltd. to deposit Rs. 10,000 with proportionate interest and respondent No. 2 C.K. Seetharam, owner of the lorry, to deposit Rs. 1,37,000 with proportionate interest and proportionate cost.2. According to
18-section briefs on any result in this list
New India Assurance Co., Ltd., Kakinada Vs. Kancherla Suryavathi and O ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-04-1999
Reported in: II(2000)ACC446; 2001ACJ1902; 2000(1)ALD149; 2000(2)ALT396
award of the Tribunal below to the extent indicated above. No costs. Motor Vehicles - compensation - Section 147 (2) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - accident occurred on 24.09.1989 - claimants claimed compensation of Rs. 7,70,000 but … is only Rs.50,000/-.3. Proviso to sub-section (2) of Section 147 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 reads as under:'147(2): Subject to the proviso to subsection (1) a policy of insurance referred to in sub-section (1), shall cover
Kolla Venkateswarlu Vs. Abdul Kareem and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-23-2004
Reported in: I(2005)ACC837; 2005ACJ1144; 2004(4)ALD729; 2004(5)ALT240
fastening the liability for the entire amount of Rs. 20,000/-on the second respondent without keeping in view Section 147(2)(b) of the Act. In reply, the contention of the learned Counsel for the appellant is that since second
United India Insurance Company Limited Vs. Mandapalli Gangaratnam Alia ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-03-2002
Reported in: III(2003)ACC533; 2003(3)ALD328
result, the appeals fail and are accordingly dismissed. No costs. Motor Vehicles - burden of proof - Sections 147 (2) and 149 (2) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - appeal against Order of award of compensation in motor … old Act is totally non-existent in the proviso to Section 147(1) of the new Act. Moreover, under Section 147(2) of the new Act there is no upper limit for the insurer regarding the amount of compensation to
The Divisional Manager, Representing United India Insurance Co. Ltd. V ...
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Mar-07-2003
Reported in: 2003(I)OLR413
with a limited liability of Rs. 50,000/- for third party risk. Hence, going by the proviso to Section 147(2) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, the liability of the Insurance Company was limited to, a sum of
Divisional Manager, United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Gokula Moharan ...
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Mar-07-2003
Reported in: 2004ACJ1893
with a limited liability of Rs. 50,000 for third party risk. Hence, going by the proviso to Section 147(2) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, the liability of the insurance company was limited to a sum of
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Gokula Moharana and anr.
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Mar-07-2003
Reported in: I(2005)ACC498
with a limited liability of Rs. 50,000/- for third party risk. Hence, going by the proviso to Section 147(2) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, the liability of the Insurance Company was limited to a sum of
Municipal Corporation of Delhi Vs. Hotu Ram
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-08-2002
Reported in: 2002IIIAD(Delhi)646; 97(2002)DLT135
the transfer of a shop No. 57, Old Rajinder Nagar, New Delhi levied under the provisions of Section 147(2)(b)(i) of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) asking its payment by means
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free