145 6 - Judgment Search Results

Mahesh Chandra Acharya Vs. Krishna Chandra Rudrapal and ors.

Court: Guwahati

and the Police .and the Magistrate were agreed that the necessary condition existed for taking proceedings Under Section 145. 6. Having thus satisfied himself that a dispute existed regarding the property and that the said dispute was likely … the Police . and the Magistrate were agreed that the necessary condition existed for taking proceedings Under Section 145.6. Having thus satisfied himself that a dispute existed regarding the property and that the said dispute was likely

Ejaz Ahmad Vs. Kunwar Maheshwar Bakhsh Singh and anr.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1953All257

P. C. The Magistrate after recording the evidence of the parties ultimately passed the final order under Section 145 (6) on 9th June 1947, declaring the applicant to be entitled to possession of the property until evicted therefrom … taken on behalf of the accused that in view of the fact that the final order under Section 145 (6) was not promulgated, the case against the accused was bound to fail. The learned Magistrate entertained this objection,

B. Gajadhar Singh Vs. State Through Sadhe

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1953All684

of Banaras rejecting the applicant's application for being restored to possession of property attached in proceedings under Section 145, Cr. P. C.2. The applicant started proceedings under 3. 145, Cr. P. C. against the opposite party some … authority laying down that it is not. He relied on -- 'Ambika Thakur v. Emperor', AIR 1939 Pat 611 (A); -- 'Elimuddin Sarkar v. Umed Ali Bepari AIR 1936 Cal 859 (B); -- 'Debi Dayal v. Annu

Rikka Yellayya Vs. Rikka Pydamma and anr.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1945Mad187; (1945)1MLJ42

to issue a patta.3. Most of the arguments in this Court have turned on the interpretation of Section 145 of the Madras Estates Land Act, the question being whether the plaintiff was bound to adopt the procedure … adopted would have been to have approached the Collector under Section 145(6) of the Madras Estates Land Act. 6. Although it would have been better had the plaintiff adopted the procedure permitted to her under Section 145(6)

Barmha Singh and ors. Vs. Emperor

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1932All681

King, J.1. This is an application in revision against an order passed by a Magistrate under Section 145, Criminal P.C. The application raises the question whether the Magistrate's omission to record in his order under Section

S.P. Nagarathinam Vs. Sub-divisional Magistrates and Sub-collector, Th ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 1993CriLJ1285

be quashed. 5. In view of the above, this petition which has got no merits, shall stand dismissed. 6. Petition dismissed. - - 145, Criminal Procedure Code was initiated on 1-11-90 in respect of unlawful dispossession made … Thanjavur West Police Station, Thanjavur, had filed F.I.R. No. 1678/90, dated 1-11-90 in Crime No. 1404/90 under S. 145, Criminal Procedure Code against counter petitioners A and B parties. On that complaint, both the counter petitioners were

Mariasusai Udayan and ors. Vs. Hajee Mahamud Azeaudeen Sahib Bahadur

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 164Ind.Cas.689

under Section 145 (1), Criminal Procedure Code, the Magistrate has no jurisdiction to pass any order under Section 145 (6), Criminal Procedure Code. These decisions I would say with all respect are correct for the reason which I

Palur Venkata Subba Reddy and ors. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and anr ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1960AP500

439 Criminal Procedure Code for revision of an order made by the First Class Magistrate, Gudur under Section 145(6), Criminal Procedure Code declaring that the 2nd respondent is entitled to be in possession of the disputed land

Gaurav JaIn Vs. Union of India and Others Overruled

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1997SC3021; 1997(2)ALD(Cri)199; 1998(3)ALLMR(SC)433; 1997(2)Crimes40(SC); JT1997(6)SC305; 1997(4)SCALE657; (1997)8SCC114; [1997]Supp2SCR105

setting up of juvenile homes for the prostitute children and children of fallen women.51. By operation of Article 145(6), to the extent both of us have agreed, the Order constitutes as binding precedent. It is to remember

Forasol Vs. Oil and Natural Gas Commission

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1984SC241; [1986]60CompCas286(SC); 1983(2)SCALE1110; 1984Supp(1)SCC263; [1984]1SCR526; 1984(16)LC17(SC)

had been occurred. He then proceeded to state :Incidentally it was pointed out that the statement on pages 145-6 and in the penultimate and last two paragraphs on page 149 regarding the document filed before me, as