14 3 - Judgment Search Results
Pratibha Finvest P. Ltd. Vs. Ito Ward 14(3), New Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2012
AOs. Relying upon one of these reports, the AO, in the present appellants case, issued notice under Section 147, seeking to reopen the assessment proceedings. The relevant part of the notice, recording the AOs reasons to believe … * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7538/2012 ITA 307/2012 Date of decision:05. 12.2012 PRATIBHA FINVEST P.LTD ..... Petitioner Through : Sh. K.R. Manjani, Advocate. versus ITO WARD
Pratibha Finvest P. Ltd. Vs. Ito Ward 14(3), New Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2012
AOs. Relying upon one of these reports, the AO, in the present appellants case, issued notice under Section 147, seeking to reopen the assessment proceedings. The relevant part of the notice, recording the AOs reasons to believe … * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7538/2012 ITA 307/2012 Date of decision:05. 12.2012 PRATIBHA FINVEST P.LTD ..... Petitioner Through : Sh. K.R. Manjani, Advocate. versus ITO WARD
Kunte & Drabu Consultants Pvt. Ltd vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 14(3), ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-11-2026
with Mr. Satyen Sethi, Mr. Artatrana Panda, Ms. Pratishtha Chaudhary and Mr. Kavya Garg, Advs.versusINCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 14(3), & ORS......Respondents Through: Mr. Anurag Ojha, SSC, Mr. V.K.Saksena and Ms. Hemalata Rawat, JSCsCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTAHON'BLE
18-section briefs on any result in this list
A) the Act of Claiming of the Alleged Mortgage of Property Bearing No. ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jan-13-2014
the application (Annexure P12) for rejection of the plaint under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC read with section 34 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (hereinafter to be
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free