13 5 - Judgment Search Results
Esteem Constructions, XIII/5 vs the Superintending Engineer
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Feb-29-2024
has not been followed by the petitioner prior to invoking the arbitration clause. In view of theorder dated 13.12.2023, by a Seven Judges Bench of theHon'ble Supreme Court, on a reference, in In Re: Interplay between Arbitration … ESTEEM CONSTRUCTIONS, XIII/5 KOVILAKAM ROAD, KOTTAKKAL, KOTTAKKAL P.O, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, RAJASANKARAN D, PIN - 676 501 BY ADV K.V.MANOJ KUMAR RESPONDENT: 1 THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER CENTRAL PUBLIC WORK DEPARTMENT M S BABURAJROAD,KALLAI, KOZHIKODE, PIN
Order of 13.5.2014 of the Rent Controller Whereby Application Vs. Harb ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-29-2014
DR. BHARAT BHUSHAN PARSOON. Present:- Mr. Sharan Sethi, Advocate for the petitioner. Dr. Bharat Bhushan Parsoon, J.Order of 13.5.2014 of the Rent Controller whereby application for recalling of order dated 26.4.2012 concerning vacation of premises as also
Date of Decision:-13.5.2014 Vs. the State of Haryana
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-13-2014
yet been framed against the accused, so, the final conclusion of trial will naturally take a long time. 5. In the light of aforesaid reasons, the instant petition for regular bail filed by the petitioner is hereby … section 439 Cr.PC, in a case registered against him along with his other Co.accused, vide FIR No.809 dated 13.12.2013 (Annexure P1).on accusation of having committed the offences punishable under sections 379, 411, 420, 468 and 471 IPC
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Date of Decision:-13.5.2014 Vs. State of Haryana
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-13-2014
on bail on her furnishing adequate bail and surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court. Sd/- 13.5.2014 (Mehinder Singh Sullar) AS Judge Arvind Kumar Sharma 2014.05.14 12:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of
Date of Decision:-13.5.2014 Vs. State of Haryana
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-13-2014
has been so recorded for the limited purpose of deciding the present petition for regular bail only. Sd/- 13.5.2014 (Mehinder Singh Sullar) AS Judge Arvind Kumar Sharma 2014.05.14 12:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of
Date of Decision:13.5.2014 Vs. Union of India and Others
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-13-2014
Officer has fallen vacant and he is entitled to be promoted against the vacant post. Diwakar Gulati 2014.05.16 13:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP No.17272-CAT of 2011 2 We do not … be entitled to the pay of the promoted post as has been held in Arindam Chattopadhyay and others v. State of West Bengal and otheRs.2013(4) SCC152and State of Haryana versus P.K.Grover (1983) 4 SCC291”. In view the
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free