12 1 - Judgment Search Results

12, I.C. Bose Road Tenants' Association Vs. Collector of Howrah and Or ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1977Cal437,(1977)2CompLJ338(Cal),82CWN33

on Dec. 2, 1974. It was inter alia stated therein that the lands comprised in the premises Nos. 12 and 16. I. C. Bose Road were likely to be nreded for public purpose, namely, for the construction … '12, I. C. Bose Road, Tenants' Association' challenged a declaration under Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 which was preceded by a notification under Section 4 of the said Act. The notification under Section 4

Presterss Wire Industries and Another Vs. Acit-12(1), Mumbai and Anoth ...

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Counsel submitted that since, the said receipt is inextricable connected with the undertakings, it would qualify for deduction. 12. On the other hand, Ld DR relied on the orders of the Revenue Authorities and reiterated the submissions … D. Karunakara Rao, AM: 1. There are four appeals under consideration. Out of four appeals, there are cross appeals for the AY 2007-2008.

Incredible Unique Buildcon Private Limited vs Office of the Income Tax ...

Court: Delhi

AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 9192/2023 INCREDIBLE UNIQUE BUILDCON PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner OFFICE OF THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 12 1 NEW DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 9297/2023 INCREDIBLE UNIQUE BUILDCON PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner OFFICE OF THE INCOME … ANR. .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 9297/2023 INCREDIBLE UNIQUE BUILDCON PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner OFFICE OF THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 12 1 NEW DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 9343/2023 CM APPL. 35591/2023 STAY INCREDIBLE UNIQUE BUILDCON PVT LTD .....Petitioner

Incredible Unique Buildcon Pvt Ltd vs Income Tax Officer Ward 12 (1) N ...

Court: Delhi

AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 9192/2023 INCREDIBLE UNIQUE BUILDCON PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner OFFICE OF THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 12 1 NEW DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 9297/2023 INCREDIBLE UNIQUE BUILDCON PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner OFFICE OF THE INCOME … ANR. .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 9297/2023 INCREDIBLE UNIQUE BUILDCON PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner OFFICE OF THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 12 1 NEW DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents + W.P.(C) 9343/2023 CM APPL. 35591/2023 STAY INCREDIBLE UNIQUE BUILDCON PVT LTD .....Petitioner

Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt Ltd vs Deputy Commissioner of Income ...

Court: Delhi

$~11 to 20* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 22/2015 + ITA 105/2021 + ITA 111/2021 + ITA 543/2023 + ITA 544/2023 + ITA 545/2023 + ITA 548/2023 + ITA 549/2023

Great Eastern Energy Corporation Ltd. Gurgaon Vs. Dy. Commissioner of ...

Court: Delhi

the objections are all without jurisdiction. The impugned notice as well as the proceedings pursuant thereto are quashed.” 12. In view of the settled law, the proceeding initiated by the AO for reopening the assessment for the … THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:30. 07.2014 W.P.(C) 1349/2014 & CM APPL. 2821/2014 GREAT EASTERN ENERGY CORPORATION LTD. GURGAON ..... Petitioner versus DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,

Dy. Cit, Range 12(1) Vs. Samta Marine Kakinada

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

said documents /papers related to assessment year 1996-97 and when confronted the assessee surrendered a sum of Rs. 12 lakhs on account of expenses like labour stitcher, boat hire and transport charges and various other miscellaneous expenses. … 1. These four appeals and cross-objection have been filed by the assessee and the revenue against the separate orders

Rajesh R. Karnani, Mumbai Vs. Asst. Cit 12(1)

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Sanjay Arora, A. M.: 1. This is a set of three Appeals by the Assessee directed against the Orders by the Commissioner of

Vijay Builders, Mumbai Vs. the Income Tax Officer Ward 12(1)(2) Mumbai

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

thereof, the Assessing Officer completed the assessment vide order date d20th December 2007, after disallowing loss of ` 12 lakhs on sale of row house. The facts relating to the disallowance of loss are that the assessee … Amit Shukla, J.M. 1. The present appeal has been preferred by the Revenue challenging the impugned order 6th January 2012, passed by