100 3 - Judgment Search Results

F.A.C. Iii Additional District and Sessions Judge Vs. Chandra Bushan U ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2007CriLJ3764

1 was working as Chief Track Engineer in S.C. Railway, Secunderabad and residing in the official Bungalow No. 100 at South Lalaguda, Secunderabad. Accused No. 1 is their servant residing in the out-house of the bungalow, accused … this appeal seek to assail the findings of guilty and conviction as against accused No. 1 under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (for brevity 'IPC') and sentencing him to death; against accused Nos. 2 to

Swadeshi CIVIL Infrastructure Private Limited vs the Executive Enginee ...

Court: Delhi

above or as a separate work (In case separate cost of structural system of a W.P.(C) 5670/2026 Page 3 of 22 particular technology is not available in the experience certificate, it will be taken as 30% of … Rajshekhar Rao Sr. Adv. with Mr. Dinkar Singh and Mr. Rohit Singh, Advs.versusTHE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER AND SENIOR MANAGER C III REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT DIVISION CPWD & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Abhishek Seth, SPC with Mr. Achal Gupta, Ms.

Commissioner of Income Tax (C) -Iii Vs. M/S Dd Industries Ltd.

Court: Delhi

in cross appeals of the assessee and the revenue ITA Nos.512/2013, 516/2013, 517/2013, 518/2013, 519/2013 & 526/2013 Page 3 (in ITA No.63-64/Del/2013; Nos. 264-266/Del/2013 and ITA No.635/Del/2013).2. The revenue urges the following substantial questions of law for

Ch. Venkaiah (Died) Per L.Rs. Vs. Government of A.P. Rep. by Principal ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2007(6)ALT436

representation for exemption of 1200 square metres in R.S. No. 485 of Gunadala village to respondents 1 and 3 herein on 22-02-1988 and the same was rejected by the 1st respondent through Memo No. 883/UC.III/2/86-32 on 15-09-1997

Commissioner of Income Tax-(C)-iii Vs. Flex Foods Ltd

Court: Delhi

Supreme Court in the case of Ajanta Pharma v. CIT:327. ITR 30.(SC), where it was made clear that 100% of the deduction would be allowable. Therefore, the Assessing Officer was wrong in allowing only 30% of the … deduction u/s 80HHC not allowed as per discussion (supra) 6,37,08,462/Book profit u/s 115JB 8,58,10,329/Rounded off u/s 288A 8,58,10,330/- 3. In respect of the above computation, there was no grievance on the part of the assessee upto the

Commissioner of Income Tax-(C)-iii Vs. Flex Foods Ltd

Court: Delhi

Supreme Court in the case of Ajanta Pharma v. CIT:327. ITR 30.(SC), where it was made clear that 100% of the deduction would be allowable. Therefore, the Assessing Officer was wrong in allowing only 30% of the … deduction u/s 80HHC not allowed as per discussion (supra) 6,37,08,462/Book profit u/s 115JB 8,58,10,329/Rounded off u/s 288A 8,58,10,330/- 3. In respect of the above computation, there was no grievance on the part of the assessee upto the

Commissioner of Income Tax (C)-iii Vs. Sh. Gopal Gupta

Court: Delhi

v. Settlement Commission & Another: (1989) 1 SCC628 2. Jyotendrasinhji v. S.I. Tripathi & Ors.:1993. Supp (3) SCC38 3. Shriyans Prasad Jain v. Income Tax Officer & Ors.:1993. Supp (4) SCC727 and 4. Union of India &

Commissioner of Income Tax, (C) - Iii Vs. Vineeta Gupta and anr.

Court: Delhi

sellers (Smt. Lata Jain and Sh. Roshan Agarwal) are concerned the Settlement Commission had passed an order on 31.12.2010 accepting the figure of Rs 16 crores.3. In a company known as D.J.Infrastructure Developers (P) Ltd., Smt. Lata

Commissioner of Income Tax (C)-iii Vs. M/S Flakes-n-flavourz New Delhi ...

Court: Delhi

v. Settlement Commission & Another: (1989) 1 SCC628 2. Jyotendrasinhji v. S.I. Tripathi & Ors.:1993. Supp (3) SCC38 3. Shriyans Prasad Jain v.Income Tax Officer & Ors.:1993. Supp (4) SCC727 and 4. Union of India & Others

Commissioner of Income Tax(C)-iii Vs. Svp Industries Ltd

Court: Delhi

be made in excess in the value of closing stock of finished goods to the tune of Rs. 3,04,39,626/-, made originally by the AO?.”2. The respondent-Assessee during the relevant period was engaged in the business of manufacture