100 1 - Judgment Search Results

C.I. Prakasan vs C.I. Bhanu

Court: Kerala

IN AS 8/2011 OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS COURT, VADAKARA OS 180/2010 OF MUNSIFF COURT, NADAPURAM ----- APPELLANT/RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT: C.I. PRAKASAN, S/O.BALAN PANICKER, AGED 69 YEARS, CHERIYA ILLAM HOUSE, KAVILUMPARA AMSOM,MOYILOTHARA DESOM,MARUTHONKARA VILLAGE, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.GEORGE … IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN TUESDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF JANUARY 2023 / 20TH POUSHA, 1944 RSA NO. 903 OF 2013 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN AS

F.C.i. Class Iv Employees Union Vs. F.C.i.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (1994)IILLJ102P& H

ORDERJawaharlal Gupta, J. 1. Is the Food Corporation of India not entitled to employ a watchman as contract labour? This is the … dismissed. In the circumstances of the case, the parties are let to bear their own costs. - Sections 100-A [As inserted by Act 22 of 2002], 110 & 104 & Letters Patent, 1865, Clause 10: [Dr. B.S.

F.C.i. Deputationists Association and ors. Vs. F.C.i. and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (1991)1CALLT176(HC),1990LabIC199,(1992)ILLJ697Cal,1990(4)SLR41

Kumar Mukherjee, J.1. Food Corporation of India Deputationists Association and others moved this writ petition on January 6, 1989, and, inter alia, prayed for a writ in the nature of Mandamus upon the Food Corporation of India

The C.i.T., U.P., Lucknow Vs. Gangadhar Baijnath, General Gang, Kanpur

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (1972)4SCC444

circumstances of the case, the receipt of Rs. 35, 01, 000 constituted income liable to tax under Section 10 of the Income-tax Act ?(2) Whether it was competent to the Appellate Asstt. Commissioner to invoke the provisions

Hirdeo Prasad (No. 8017761) Ex-constable of C.i.S.F. Unit B.T.P.S. (D. ...

Court: Jharkhand

Reported in: [2005(3)JCR381(Jhr)]

ORDERM.Y. Eqbal, J. 1. Petitioner has challenged the order passed by the Inspector General, Central Industrial Security Force, Eastern Sector, Patna, whereby … The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner at the relevant time was a constable in C.I.S.F. In 1992 he was served with a memorandum of charges for holding an enquiry under Rule 34 of

M. Vallavaraj, d Company C.i.S.F. Unit, Madras Port Trust Vs. the Depu ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [2005(105)FLR686]; (2005)2MLJ152

ORDERR. Balasubramanian, J.1. The writ petitioner came to be dismissed from service by order dated 20.02.1993 passed by the second respondent which was affirmed by the appellate authority/first respondent by order dated 20.12.1993. This order of...

C.i.t.,delhi Vs. Bharti Hexacom Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

For 4th year and onwards, the licencee was liable to pay variable licence fee @ Rs. 5,00,000/- per 100 subscribers or part thereof, with a specific stipulation on minimum licence fee payable for 4th to 6th year … REPORTABLE2023INSC917IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 11128 OF2016C.I.T., DELHI ....APPELLANT(S) VS. BHARTI HEXACOM LTD. ...RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 4902/2022 CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 162/2018 CIVIL

C.I.T Mumbai Vs. M/S Sarkar Builders

Court: Supreme Court of India

ground that their cases were covered by sub- section (10) of Section 80IB which provides for deduction of 100% of profits in the case of an undertaking developing and building housing projects when such profits are derived … ground that their cases were covered by sub- section (10) of Section 80IB which provides for deduction of 100% of profits in the case of an undertaking developing and building housing projects when such profits are derived

C.I.T and Anr Vs. M/S Yokogawa India Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

for the purposes of sections 10A and 10B shall be of the undertaking located in specified zones or 100% Export Oriented Undertakings, as the case may be, and this shall not have any material relationship with the … in all the special leave petitions.2. The true and correct meaning and effect of the provisions of Section 10A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) is the principal issue arising for

C.i.T., Mumbai Vs. Emptee Poly-yarn Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (2010)229CTR(SC)1; 2010(250)ELT321(SC); [2010]320ITR665(SC); JT2010(1)SC456; 2010(I)OLR(SC)500; 2010(1)SCALE571; (2010)2SCC720; 2010(2)LC620(SC)

Section 80IA of the Income Tax Act, 1961?4. The lead matter in this batch of Civil Appeals is C.I.T., Mumbai v. Emptee Poly-Yarn Pvt. Ltd. (Civil Appeal arising out of S.L.P.(C) No. 26482/2008), in which the relevant … oriented yarn ('POY' for short) amounts to 'manufacture' in terms of Section 80IA of the Income Tax Act, 1961?4. The lead matter in this batch of Civil Appeals is C.I.T., Mumbai v. Emptee Poly-Yarn Pvt. Ltd. (Civil