10 And 11 A - Judgment Search Results
Kumar Jagdish Chandra Sinha and others Vs. Mrs. Eileen K. Patricia D'R ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-10-1994
Reported in: AIR1995SC515; JT1994(7)SC512; 1994(4)SCALE940; (1995)1SCC164; [1994]Supp5SCR440
ORDERM.K. Mukherji, J.1. I.A. No. 2 of 1994 allowed.2. At all material times one Mrs. Sira Menan was a tenant under the appellants in respect of a flat in premises No. 23, Lindsay Street, Calcutta. After...
Bokajan Cement Corporation Employees' Union Vs. Cement Corporation of ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-10-2003
Reported in: AIR2004SC245; 2004(5)ALLMR(SC)11; [2004(1)JCR41(SC)]; 2003(3)JKJ124[SC]; JT2003(8)SC482; (2004)ILLJ197SC; 2003(9)SCALE477; (2004)1SCC142; 2004(1)SLJ485(SC); (2004)1UPLBEC46
Matched in: Citation AIR2004SC245; 2004(5)ALLMR(SC)11; [2004(1)JCR41(SC)]; 2003(3)JKJ124[SC]; JT2003(8)SC482; (2004)ILLJ197SC; 2003(9)SCALE477; (2004)1SCC142; 2004(1)SLJ485(SC); (2004)1UPLBEC46
Pandurang W. Patil Vs. Chetna's H.S. College of Commerce and Economics ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-10-1998
Reported in: (1999)IIILLJ941Bom
Kumar Bhola, reported in : (1997)ILLJ854SC wherein it was held that notwithstanding the fact that a period of 10 years elapsed since the chargesheet was filed and the accused was suspended, it was inconceivable that a bank … February 13, 1981 to the non-Government affiliated colleges in exercise of the powers conferred upon him under Section 11 (6)(b) of the Bombay University Act, 1974. His argued that it is only Civil Services Rules which have
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Siddharth Kejriwal Vs. Employees' State Insurance Corporation
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-10-1994
Reported in: [1997]90CompCas496(Kar)
case of an offence which takes place when an act or omission is committed once and for all.' 10. In the above case, it was held that the offence regarding failure to submit a return within the … a return within the particular time is committed once and for all and is not a continuing offence. 11. Sri Papanna has strongly relied on the decision in Bhagirath Kanoria v. State of M.P., : [1985]1SCR626 to
Bank Officers' and Officials' House Building Co-operative Society Limi ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-10-2004
Reported in: 2005(1)KarLJ245
the order passed by the Arbitrator and also placing reliance on the order passed by this Court dated 10-3-2000 in W.P. No. 35597 and connected matters, has partly allowed the appeal and modified the award to the … ORDERN.K. Patil, J.1. The petitioner, assailing the correctness of the order dated 11-6-2004 in Appeal No. 836 of 2000 on the file of the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore vide Annexure-B and
Dy. Conservator of Forest Vs. Shramjivi General Workers' Union
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Nov-10-2000
Reported in: [2001(89)FLR213]; (2001)ILLJ458Guj
adjudicated. (12) As interim measure Rs. 100/- should be given to the daily rated employees till condition No. 11 is adjudicated. (13) That the demands should be complied with from 22.8.1985 and the benefits may be given … - Shramjivi General Workers Union, Palanpur, Banaskantha had raised industrial dispute which was referred for adjudication under Section 10(1) of the Act by the Government of Gujarat, Labour and Employment Department, Gandhinagar to the Industrial Tribunal, Ahmedabad
Nagpur Hotel Owner's Association and Ors. Vs. State of Maharshtra and ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-10-1964
Reported in: AIR1965Bom169; (1965)67BOMLR206; ILR1965Bom387; (1965)IILLJ482Bom; 1965MhLJ429
Central Act No. 31 of 1961 had the effect of abrogating and repealing the Maharashtra Amending Act No. 10 of 1961.(5) Thereafter the Maharshtra State Legislature again enacted Act No. 3 of 1963. By this new Amending … February 1961. By section 2 of this Amending Act, the original section 3 in the Central Act No. 11 of 1948 was amended and provisos permitting the fixation of minimum wages for the whole State or for
R.B. Raghunath Singh and Co. Vs. Commissioner under Workmen's Compensa ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-10-1959
Reported in: (1960)ILLJ598AP
Matched in: Parties R.B. Raghunath Singh and Co. Vs. Commissioner under Workmen's Compensation Act and Anr. (10.11.1959 - APHC)
Pandarathil Chithomah's son Nanu Nair Vs. Pulikiye Moorkattil Karnavan ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Nov-10-1892
Reported in: (1893)3MLJ141
Matched in: Parties Pandarathil Chithomah's son Nanu Nair Vs. Pulikiye Moorkattil Karnavan and Manager Kunhi Amah's son Raman Menon and Ors. (10.11.1892 - MADHC)
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free