10 3 - Judgment Search Results

Sgs India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax-10(3)(1) ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2007(2)BomCR628; (2007)208CTR(Bom)263; [2007]292ITR93(Bom); 2007(4)MhLj93

reopening of the assessment for AY 2001-02 based on the assessment order for AY 2002-03 is wholly unjustified. 10. Relying upon a full bench decision of the Delhi High Court in the case of CIT v. Kelvinator … the assessment.3. The petitioner carries on business of providing verification, inspection and certification of services in India. On 30th October, 2001, the petitioners filed its return of income for AY 2001-02 declaring the taxable income of Rs.8,42,67,317/-.

Date of Decision: 10.3.2014 Vs. Surjit and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR No.1689 of 2014 Date of Decision: 10.3.2014 Vijender and others ....Petitioners Versus Surjit and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE RAJIV NARAIN RAINA Present : Mr.Sumit

Suditi Indusries Ltd, Navi Mumbai Vs. Asst. Cit, Circle - 10(3)

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

effect there was only one working capital loan, granted on 29.12.1998 for Rs.840 lacs, in the loans waived. 3. We have heard the parties, and perused the material on record. The Revenue, it is claimed, has proceeded … for which the ld. Authorized Representative (AR), the assessee's counsel, would advert our attention to pgs.7, 80 and 101 of the assessee's paper-book (PB). Of the nine loans that stood waived, bearing a total liability of Rs.44.66