Rajasthan Court August 1990 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Alexis and anr. Vs. Rajasthan State Road Trans. Corporation and anr.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-31-1990
Reported in: 1991ACJ980
I.S. Israni, J.1. This writ petition has been filed in which interim compensation in a motor accident claim has been prayed to be given as palliative compensation for expenses required for examining witnesses on commission in USA2. Briefly stated, a motor accident took place in January, 1988, in which petitioner No. 1, who had come to India from U.S.A to participate in peace march, received serious injuries. The peace march commenced from Sabarmati Ashram (Ahmedabad) on 4.12.1987. After crossing Jaipur, when the petitioner No. 1, along with petitioner No. 2, his mother, reached near village Lakher on way to New Delhi, where the peace march was to conclude at Rajghat, bus No. RMP 897, owned by non-petitioner No. 1, was going from Jaipur towards Delhi. The accident took place at about 1.30 p.m. It is said that the bus was driven rashly and negligently at a very high speed by the driver, which hit the petitioner No. 1 from behind, due to which he fell down on the road and became unconscio...
Pooran Ram and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-29-1990
Reported in: 1990(2)WLN163
1. By the Court. The appellants were tried by the Sessions Judge, Chum for the Charges Under Sections 147, 302 read with 149, 325, 323 read with 149 IPC. Vide judgment dated February 3, 1984 the learned Sessions Judge held them all guilty and convicted them Under Sections 147, 302 read with 149, 325 read with 149 and 323 IPC and sentenced them of one year RI Under Section 147 IPC, imprisonment for life and a fine of Rs. 1000/-, in default of payment of fine to undergo six months RI each Under Section 302 read with 149 IPC. Three years RI and a fine of Rs. 500/-, in default of payment of fine to undergo three months RI Under Section 325 read with 149 IPC and six months RI Under Section 323 IPC with an order that all the substantive sentences shall run concurrently.2. Feeling aggrieved by their conviction and sentences the appellants have preferred this appeal in this Court.3. Succinctly narrated the facts of the case giving rise to the trial and conviction of the appellants and the pres...
Hamji Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-29-1990
Reported in: 1990WLN(UC)440
A.K. Mathur, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 20th of October, 1977, passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Banswara, convicting the appellant Under Section 302 IPC and awarding a sentence of life imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 200/-.2. The incident which led to the prosecution of the present appellant took place in the field on 21st. June, 1977 when Kamji deceased was ploughing the land. At that time Hamji came there and asked Kamji not plough the land and inflicted injury with 'Kash'. At that time, Hamji was accompanied by Bhuria and Kalia. The report of this incident was lodged at Police Station, Sallepat, District Banswara on 21st June, 1977 at 11.30 A.M. by Bhoorji son of Kamji. The prosecution in support of its case examined 16 witnesses PW 1 Bhoorji, PW 2 Jokhi and PW 15 Kanti are the eyewitnesses to the occurrence who has supported the prosecution case during the trial PW 9 Soma and PW 1 Punja, who were cultivating their fields came at the scene of the occu...
State of Rajasthan Vs. Sant Kumar
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-28-1990
Reported in: 1990(2)WLN174
1. This is an application for leave to appeal against the-judgment of learned Sessions Judge, Sri Ganganagar who acquitted the respondents of charges Under Sections 304B and 306, IPC along with Section 498' IPC and sec 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, The case started on an. F.I.R. Ex. P. 20 lodged at police station, Hindumalkote on 27-2-1987 at 11.30 a.m. submitted by one Shri Nanuram, P.W. 8, wherein the allegations were levelled against the respondents, on the basis of which a case was registered for various offences. It is pertinent to mention here that earlier to this report the matter had aleady been reported to the police station by Santram, informing about the burns having been sustained by the deceased Dropadi. After investigation the prosecution submitted a charge sheet against both the respondents who were committed to the court of Sessions. The prosecution had examined 14 witnesses in support of its case and the accused examined Dr Dhameeja in their defense. Learned Se...
Sujan Singh Vs. the State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-28-1990
Reported in: 1990(2)WLN597
M. Kapur, J.1. The Sessions Judge, Jhalawar by his judgment dated 28th August 1982 found the appellant guilty for the offence Under Section 376 IPC and sentenced him to four years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 1,000/-. In default of payment of fine he was directed to under go rigorous imprisonment for six months. Against the conviction and sentence the appellant has prefered this appeal.2. The incident out of which this case arises occured on 14.6.1981. The prosecutrix is Mst. Anokhi Bai, whose age at the time of incident was 20 years. She reported at Police Station, Dug that on the day of the incident she proceeded on the way to Karasra and she sat down to answer the call of nature behind a bush and at that time the accused came there and caught hold of her. She shouted but her mouth was closed by cloth. Then she was forcibly taken to a ditch and there the accused committed rape upon her. She could shout only when the cloth was removed from her month after the act of rape wa...
Gordhan and ors. Vs. the State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-28-1990
Reported in: 1991(1)WLN400
N.L. Tibrewal, J.1. This revision petition has been filed against the judgment of the learned Sessions Judge, Bundi passed on 9th March, 1989 in Criminal Appeal No. 2/87 by which he maintained the conviction and sentences of the petitioners Under Section 379 IPC to one year simple imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 250/- each.2. The facts of the case are that a case Under Section 379 IPC was registered at Police Station Bundi on 15th May, 1977 on the report of one Nand Kishore of Kota. In the said report, it was alleged that his cousin brother, along with his wife and the wife of younger brother were going to Udaipur in a night bus then some persons took away their two boxes, which were placed on the roof of the bus. After registering the case, Police recovered the articles from the possession of the accuse on their information and after completion of the investigation, submitted a charge- sheet against the petitioners and one co-accused Dana Ram.3. During trial, prosecution examined as ma...
Kishan Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-27-1990
Reported in: 1992CriLJ592; 1990WLN(UC)308
Kanta Bhatnagar, J.1. Petitioner Kishan Singh, a detenu under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (for short 'COFEPOSA' hereinafter) was arrested on October 24, 1989 in pursuance of the order dated December, 8, 1988.2. Feeling aggrieved by his detention he has invoked the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and prayed for quashing the order of his detention dated December 8, 1988 (Annexure-1) as well as order dated January 4, 1990 (Annexure-5) by which after the consideration of the case of the petitioner by the Advisory Board, he was ordered to be detained in custody for a period of two years from October 24, 1989, the date of his arrest in pursuance of the order dated December 8, 1988 (Annexure-1).3. The allegation against the petitioner was that he was involved in nefarious activities of smuggling of Silver and Narcotics Drugs. An order under the COFEPOSA Act was passed against him ...
NaraIn and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-27-1990
Reported in: 1990(2)WLN214
Kanta Bhatnagar, J.1. Appellants Gheesa and Narain along with eight others were tried for the charges Under Sections 147, 148, 302, 307, 323 load with 149, IPC by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bhilwara. Vide judgment dated August 29, 1985 eight accused were acquitted of the charges. Gheesa appellant was bow ever held guilty Under Sections 302/34 and 323/34, IPC and sentenced to imprisonment for life and a fine of Rs. 150/- in default of payment of fine to undergo three months RI on the first count and three months RI on the second count. Narain appellant was held guilty Under Section 302/34, IPC and sentenced to imprisonment for life and a fine of Rs. 150/-, in default of payment of fine to undergo three months RI Gheesa and Narain have referred this appeal against that judgment.2. The prosecution case was that P.W. 20 Sohan Singh, ASI Biged Police Station bad gone to Bigod from Police Chowki Barundi in connection with investigation of a case. While returning to the police station on ...
Pooran Ram and ors. Vs. the State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-27-1990
Reported in: 1990(2)WLN502
Kanta Bhatnagar, J.1. The appellants were tried by the Sessions Judge, Churu for the charges Under Sections 147, 302 read with 149, 325, 323 read with 149 I.P.C. vide judgment dated February 3, 1984, the learned Sessions Judge held them all guilty and convicted them Under Sections 147, 302 read with 149, 325 read with 149 and 323 I.P.C. and sentenced them of one years Rule I. Under Section 147 I.P.C. imprisonment for life and a fine of Rs.1000/-, in default of payment of fine to undergo six months R.I. each under I Section 302 read with 149 I.P.C. there years R.I. and a fine of Rs. 500/- in default of payment of fine to undergo three months Rule I. Under Section 325 read with 149 I.P.C. and six months Rule I. Under Section 323 I.P.C. with an order that all the substantive sentences shall run concurrently2. Feeling aggrieved by their conviction and sentences the appellants have preferred this appeal in this court.3. Succinctly narrated the facts of the case giving rise to the trial and ...
Om Prakash Vs. the State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-27-1990
Reported in: 1990(2)WLN599
N.L. Tibrewal, J.1. This revision is directed against the judgment-dated 23.1.1989 passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge No. 2 Ajmer in Criminal Appeal No. 17/86 by which the conviction of the petitioner Under Section 304A IPC and sentences passed against him by the Judicial Magistrate No. 1, Ajmer were maintained.2. The facts of the case are that a report was lodged at police station, Civil Lines, Ajmer on 5.1.1981 by one Anna Singh. In the said report it was stated that he (informant) and one Bhanwar Singh both were standing near a tree and were talking then one truck bearing No. R.S.Z. 1175 came from Ajmer side and struck to his grandson Surendra @ Pappu who was aged 6 1/2 years, while he was crossing the road. It is alleged that the boy had already covered 3/4 of the road but before he could cross the road the truck struck to him and the boy was run over from the right-side wheel of the truck.3. On the aforesaid report, police registered criminal case Under Section 304 IPC. Af...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next ›
- Last »