Rajasthan Court August 1990 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kalu and ors. Vs. Karnidan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-01-1990
Reported in: 1990(2)WLN181
V.S. Dave, J.1. This in an application Under Section Seciton 482. Cr. PC against the order passed by learned Sessions Judge, Bundi, on March 10, 1989 by which he dismissed the part of the prayer of the petitioners in revision filed against the order, dated 26th August 1988 passed by the learned A.CM. Bundi in proceedings Under Section 145, Cr. PC.2. Brief facts giving rise to this petition are that non-petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 Karnidan and Kishan Singh aged 75 years and 70 years respectively are real brothers. They filed an application Under Section 145 Cr. PC before learned A.C.M. Bundi on 17 August, 1988, wherein it was alleged by them that they are the Khatedars and are in cultivatory possession of 15 Bighas 15 Biswas of land in Khasrn No. 75 old Khasra No. 25 in village Theekariya Charans, Tehsil in District Bundi. This land is known as Peeplibala. It was alleged by them that they had given the land for cultivation on Aadoli in erstwhile Bundi State to Rodu, father of petitioner No....
Rajandar Singh Vs. State and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-01-1990
Reported in: 1990(2)WLN566
Inder Sen Israni, J.1. In all the above-mentioned writ petitions, common questions of law have been raised, therefore, all the petitions are decided by single order. It is claimed by the petitioners that the Combined Competitive Examinations for Lower Division Clerks, for which advertisement was issued on July 23,1987 (Ex.1) were not held in accordance with the Rajasthan Subordinate Offices Ministerial Staff Rules, 1957 (for brevity, 'Rules, 1957') and option of giving two Districts for appointment was not given, therefore, meritorious Candidates could not get appointment. It has been prayed that the selection made and appointments given be, therefore, quashed & set aside. Alternatively, out of the remaining vacancies in Bikaner district, the petitioners be given appointment as lower Division Clerks.2. The Rajasthan Public Service Commission (for brevity, 'RPSC') issued an advertisement dated July 23, 1986, inviting applications for Lower Division elerks combined Competitive Examinatio...
Ramesh and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-01-1990
Reported in: 1990WLN(UC)319
Milap Chandra, J.1. This first writ petition was filing by a member, Municipal Council, Churu on April 5,1990 for quashing the notice, Annexure 1, dated March 31, 1990 issued by the Collector Churu (respondent No. 2) Under Rule 3(2), Rajasthan Municipalities (Motion of Non-Confidence against Chairman or Vice Chairman) Rules, 1974 (hereinafter to be called 'the Rules'), fixing April 9, 1990 for the consideration of the motion of non-confidence against the Chairman of the Municipal Council, Churu, Shri Ram Gopal Behad, for restraining the Collector, Churu (respondent no. 2) and Shri Kishan Singh, Pariyojna Prabankdhak, Anusuchit Jati Vikas Nigam, Churu (respondent No. 3) from holding the meeting for consideration of the motion of non-confidence and for quashing the entire proceedings of the said meeting, if it is held. The second writ petition was filed on April 12, 1990 against the same respondents by another member of the Municipal Council, Churu for quashing the non-confidence motion ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›