Rajasthan Jodhpur Court April 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dr Abbas Ali Saifee Vs. State and anr
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Apr-20-2013
S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.1948/1995 Dr. Abbas Ali Saifee Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr. Date of Order :2. 4.2013 HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI None present for petitioner. Mr. M.S. Singhvi, Sr. Advocate assisted by Mr. Amit Tatia for the respondent No.2. Mr. Jamwant Gurjar for respondent No.1. Learned counsel for the respondents No.1 and 2 inform the Court that petitioner as well as respondent No.2 have already been superannuated and, therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous. From the relief claimed in the writ petition, it is clear that the relief as prayed for cannot be granted to the petitioner as he has already been superannuated. In such circumstances, this writ petition has become infructuous. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. [VIJAY BISHNOI],J.Babulal/ 1...
Suresh Chand Sharma Vs. Swami Kesh. Raj. Agri. University and anr
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Apr-17-2013
1 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3814/2013 Suresh Chand Sharma Vs. Swami Keshwanand Rajasthan Agricultural University, Bikaner & Anr. Date of Order : April 17th, 2013 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K. LOHRA Mr.Mukesh Vyas, for the petitioner/s. ****** Heard. By the instant writ petition the petitioner has sought following directions against the respondents:- (i)The respondents may kindly be directed to regularize the services of the petitioner on the post of Class IV with effect from the date of his initial appointment i.e. 3.3.1978, with all consequential benefits. (ii) The respondents may kindly be directed to allow the benefit of third selection grade to the petitioner while counting his service from the date of his initial appointment, and further the respondents may kindly be directed to allow the difference of arrears to the petitioner with interest @ 18% per annum to the petitioner. (iii) Any other relief to which the petitioner is entitled, may be granted in his favour. (iv) The writ petit...
Smt.Patas Kanwar and ors Vs. Gordhan Ram and ors
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Apr-17-2013
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :JUDGMENT: S.B. CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO.1862/2011 Smt. Patas Kanwar & Ors. Vs. Gordhan Ram & Ors. Date of Judgment ::17. 4.2013 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Mr. Rajesh Panwar, for the appellants. Mr. Dhanpat Choudhary, for the respondent No.5. ----- BY THE COURT: This appeal has been preferred by the claimants-appellants aggrieved against the rejection of their application for compensation ('Application') by the Judge, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Phalodi, District Jodhpur ('the Tribunal'). The brief facts of the case are that the claimants filed an application seeking compensation on account of death of one Mool Singh, who died on account of injuries suffered by him, while travelling in Jeep not RJ-06-G-3084 on 30.3.2007. 2 It appears that during the pendency of the application despite giving seven opportunities to lead evidence the claimants did not lead any oral or documentary evidence in support of their appli...
Smt.Jhamku Vs. Khayali
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Apr-17-2013
1 S.B. CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.218/2012 Smt. Jhamku Vs. Khayali Date of Order ::17. 4.2013 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Mr. Abhinav Jain, for the petitioner/s ------ It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that during the pendency of the revision petition, the suit from which the said revision petition had arisen itself has been decided by the trial court. In that view of the matter, the revision petition has become infructuous and the same is, therefore, dismissed as having become infructuous. (ARUN BHANSALI), J.rm/...
Babu Lal Vs. State of Raj. and anr
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Apr-17-2013
[1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.747/2013 Babu Lal Versus State of Rajasthan & Anr. Date of Order :17. 04.2013 PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR Mr. Harish Purohit for the petitioner Mr. I.S. Pareek for the respondents BY THE COURT : By the order dated 11.03.2010, the Superintendent of Police, Barmer while exercising powers under Rule 13 of the Rajasthan Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules placed the petitioner under suspension contemplating disciplinary action. During the period of suspension, the respondents paid subsistence allowance to the petitioner as prescribed. An another order dated 08.12.2011 was passed by the Superintendent of Police, Barmer instructing competent authorities to utilize service of all the suspended police officials/personnel in uniform to maintain law and order [2] conditions. The order aforesaid was made looking non- availability of adequate police Nafri. Under the or...
State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur Vs. U.i.T., Bhilwara and ors
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Apr-17-2013
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JDOHPUR ORDER S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 2514/2013 (SBBJ Vs. U.I.T. Bhilwara & Ors) Date of Order ::17. 04.2013 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS Dr. Sachin Acharya, for the petitioner. Mr. Sandeep Shah for the respondents. Mr. Kamal Dave ] Heard learned counsel for the parties. In this writ petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, petitioner has prayed for quashing the order dated 05.02.2013 (Annex.14) passed by the Civil judge (J.D) West Bhilwara whereby, application filed under Section 151 CPC in Civil Suit No. 89/2012 by the petitioner Bank was rejected. The main contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that dispute is going on in between U.I.T Bhilwara and respondents No. 3 with regard to premises in which Bank was established. The U.I.T, Bhilwara took decision to seize the said premises on the ground that conversion of land is not in consonance with law. The respondent no.3 filed a suit...
Ladu Ram and ors Vs. State and ors
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Apr-17-2013
D.B. C.W.P. No.4089/2013 1/2 D.B. C.W.P. No.4089/2013 Date of Order:17. h April 2013 HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR AMITAVA ROY HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.K. MATHUR Mr Kailash Jangid, for the petitioners Mr G.R. Punia, Additional Advocate General, for the caveator-respondent State Heard Mr Kailash Jangid for the petitioners and learned Additional Advocate General Mr G.R. Punia for the respondents. Issue notice, returnable on 29th April 2013. As learned Additional Advocate General Mr G.R. Punia has entered appearance on behalf of all the respondents, no formal notice be issued to them. Learned counsel for the petitioners would serve adequate number of copies of the writ petition along with annexures to Mr Punia, appearing on behalf of the respondents. Heard the learned counsel for the parties on the prayer for interim relief. It is submitted at the Bar that this prayer has already been examined by a coordinate Bench of this Court in a batch of writ petitions, the lead case being D.B. Civil Writ...
Khima Ram Vs. State (Pan. Raj.) and ors
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Apr-17-2013
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JDOHPUR ORDER S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 7806/2012 (Khima Ram Vs. State & Ors) Date of Order ::17. 04.2013 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS Mr. Rakesh Arora, for the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. In all above writ petitions, petitioner is challenging validity of impugnd order dated 14.05.2012 (Annex.5) passed by Additional Collector, Jalore whereby, the Additional Collector while exercising power under Section 97 of Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 [hereinafter referred to as 'Act of 1994] read with Rule 167 of Rajasthan Panchayati Raj Rules, 1996 [hereinafter referred to as 'Rules of 1996] cancelled the patta. Brief facts of the case are that in pursuance of a resolution passed by Gram Panchayat Ajeet pura, Panchayat Samiti Jalore dated 05.03.2008, a patta was issued in favour of petitioner for the plot which is alleged to be in possession of petitioner and his ancestors for last about fifty years. Th...
Ujjawal Singh Vs. L I C of India and ors
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Apr-17-2013
S.B. CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO.1516/2007 Ujjawal Singh Vs. Life Insurance Corporation of India, Jodhpur & Ors. Date of Order ::17. 04.2013 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Mr. J.K. Bhaiya, for the appellant. Mr. B.K. Bhatnagar, for respondent No.1. ---- An application has been filed by the appellant, inter alia, with the averments that the matter has been settled between the parties and, therefore, the appellant may be permitted to withdraw the appeal. For the reasons mentioned in the application, which is not disputed by counsel appearing for respondent No.1, the application is allowed. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. (ARUN BHANSALI), J.A.K. Chouhan/-...
Prakash Vs. Smt.Anusha and anr
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Apr-17-2013
- 987/2009 ! 17-04-2013 1 #&'# && &&&+&&&-#-# -,& &&&3. --::&&8&-::-- #&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& & 987/2009 ***** 8-&=#> &&:& && 17 ?, 2013 -: '&:- #C-&-#-# &&C&G H&#G J L , ! -1 ? T L -2 V X \ :1. L V , , , _ 22/2005 " " a ! / ! 13 _ e a ! _ 20-05-2009 -2 , ! -1- ! a ? V 2._ e L ? i, \ i - 987/2009 ! 17-04-2012. V X X i a ! -1- ! V 13 _ e ! / \ _Xm m _ 04-02-2001 X X _ !? _ ? ? L ? _X ! L ! -1- ! X ? s? _ _ ? X a vV V ! V 3.! / L V \ X? ? _Xm m x m -1, 2, 2- 2- x m X ! -1- ! a L L _ m V \ ! 4- X L V ? X a ! m a ! \ 27 _ e ? V ! -1- ! X _ ? _? i, 27 _ e V ? i \ \ V ! -1- ! - 987/2009 ! 17-04-2013 3 V i, X , \ X \ ! -1- ! ? m a i e a AIR 198.Rajasthan 157 "Anil Kumar Vs. Smt. Jyoti" a ! V X a X T i _ i X L x 498 ,406 x _v _ _! X? X , \? , _? _ 08-07-2008 V a ! -1- ! X _! , m a X , ! a ?-1 a _\ V a i, v i X L ! ? V _ ? i, ? ! a i a m? \ -2 ! \ ? ?_ i ? ! a ? 1- AIR 198.Rajasthan 157 Anil Kumar Vs. Smt. Jyoti 2- (1997) 2 Supreme Court Cases 397 Smt. Rashmi Kumar Vs. Mahesh Kumar Bhada - 987/2009 ! ...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »