Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Smt.Jhamku Vs. Khayali

Smt.Jhamku vs Khayali

Type Court Judgment Court Rajasthan Jodhpur Decided Apr 17, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/973597

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Rajasthan Jodhpur High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Smt.Jhamku

Respondent

Khayali

Excerpt

1 s.b. civil revision petition no.218/2012 smt. jhamku vs. khayali date of order ::17. 4.2013 hon'ble mr. justice arun bhansali mr. abhinav jain, for the petitioner/s ------ it is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that during the pendency of the revision petition, the suit from which the said revision petition had arisen itself has been decided by the trial court. in that view of the matter, the revision petition has become infructuous and the same is, therefore, dismissed as having become infructuous. (arun bhansali), j.rm/

Full Judgment

1 S.B. CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.218/2012 Smt. Jhamku Vs. Khayali Date of Order ::

17. 4.2013 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI Mr. Abhinav Jain, for the petitioner/s ------ It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that during the pendency of the revision petition, the suit from which the said revision petition had arisen itself has been decided by the trial court. In that view of the matter, the revision petition has become infructuous and the same is, therefore, dismissed as having become infructuous. (ARUN BHANSALI), J.

rm/

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial