Rajasthan Jodhpur Court June 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Satyanarayan Vs. State
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Jun-28-2012
1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.4539/2012 Satyanarayan Vs. State of Rajasthan Date of Order:28. 06/2012. PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS, V.J.Mr. Nadish Singhvi, for the petitioner. Mr. Mahipal Bishnoi, PP for the State. Mr. N.K. Bohra, for the complainant. -- Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the complainant and the learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material available on record. It is submitted that the petitioner was arrested in connection with FIR No.148/2012, of Police Station- Ratanada, Jodhpur, for the offence u/s 323, 341 and 307 of IPC. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the although there is allegation of inflicting injury upon the stomach of the injured, however, that injury is simple in nature. He further submits that the petitioner is behind the bars since his arrest, therefore, he may be enlarged on bail. Learned counsel for the ...
Maqbool Khan and ors Vs. State
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Jun-28-2012
1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.4632/2012 Maqbook Khan & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan Date of Order:28. 06/2012. PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS, V.J.Mr. S.S. Sisodia, for the petitioners. Mr. Mahipal Bishnoi, PP for the State. -- Heard learned counsel for the applicants and the learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material available on record. It is submitted that the petitioners were arrested in connection with FIR No.118/2012, of Police Station- Railmagra, District Rajsamand, for the offence u/s 420 and 384 of IPC. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are in judicial custody since their arrest. However, since no recovery is to be made from the petitioners, therefore, they may be enlarged on bail. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that the petitioners are not entitled for bail. Having regard to the nature of ac...
Karamjeet Singh and anr Vs. State
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Jun-28-2012
1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.4396/2012 Karamjeet Singh & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan Date of Order:28. 06/2012. PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS, V.J.Mr. G.R. Bhai on behalf of Mr. S.K. Poonia, for the petitioners. Mr. Anil Upadhayay, PP for the State. -- Heard learned counsel for the applicants and the learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material available on record. It is submitted that the petitioners are in judicial custody in connection with FIR No.94/2012, of Police Station- Pallu, District- Hanumangarh for the offence u/s 5, 6 and 8 of Rajasthan Bovine (Prohibition of Slaughter & Export) Act, 1995. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that no recovery is to be made from the petitioners and the investigation has also been completed, therefore, they may be enlarged on bail. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that the petition...
Ram Lal @ Ramiya Vs. State
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Jun-28-2012
1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.4574/2012 Ram Lal @ Ramiya Vs. State of Rajasthan Date of Order:28. 06/2012. PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS, V.J.Mr. H.S. Shrimali, for the petitioner. Mr. Anil Upadhayay, PP for the State. -- Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material available on record. The petitioner has filed the present bail application, who was absconding from last 14 years. The petitioner was arrested in pursuance of standing arrest warrant issued by the trial court. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that marriage of the petitioner's daughter is going to be solemnized on 29.06.2012, therefore, he may be enlarged on bail. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that the petitioner is not entitled for bail. Having regard to the nature of accusation and taking into consideration tot...
Gokul and anr Vs. State
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Jun-28-2012
1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.4640/2012 Gokul & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan Date of Order:28. 06/2012. PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS, V.J.Mr. N.K. Bohra, for the petitioners. Mr. Mahipal Bishnoi, PP for the State. -- Heard learned counsel for the applicants and the learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material available on record. It is submitted that the petitioners are in judicial custody in connection with FIR No.80/2012, of Police Station- Bijaypur, District- Chittorgarh for the offence u/s 365, 384, 374 and 342/34 of IPC. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that no recovery is to be made from the petitioners and the investigation has also been completed, therefore, they may be enlarged on bail. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that the petitioners are not entitled for bail. Having regard to the nature of accusation and ta...
Jangir Singh and ors Vs. State
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Jun-28-2012
1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.4403/2012 Jangir Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan Date of Order:28. 06/2012. PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS, V.J.Mr. G.R. Bhai on behalf of Mr. S.K. Poonia, for the petitioners. Mr. Anil Upadhayay, PP for the State. -- Heard learned counsel for the applicants and the learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material available on record. It is submitted that the petitioners are in judicial custody in connection with FIR No.95/2012, of Police Station- Pallu, District- Hanumangarh for the offence u/s 5, 6 and 8 of Rajasthan Bovine (Prohibition of Slaughter & Export) Act, 1995. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that no recovery is to be made from the petitioners and the investigation has also been completed, therefore, they may be enlarged on bail. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that the petitioners...
Smt.Saraswati Vs. State
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Jun-28-2012
1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.4634/2012 Smt. Saraswati Vs. State of Rajasthan Date of Order:28. 06/2012. PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS, V.J.Mr. Shambhoo Singh, for the petitioner. Mr. Mahipal Bishnoi, PP for the State. -- Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material available on record. It is submitted that the petitioner was arrested in connection with FIR No.170/2012, of Police Station- Bhupalpura, District Udaipur, for the offence u/s 392/34 of IPC. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in judicial custody since her arrest, however, since no recovery is to be made from her, therefore, she may be enlarged on bail. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that the petitioner is not entitled for bail. Having regard to the nature of accusation and taking into consider...
Oma Ram Vs. State
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Jun-28-2012
1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.4272/2012 Oma Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan Date of Order:28. 06/2012. PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS, V.J.Mr. P.N. Mohanani, for the petitioner. Mr. Anil Upadhayay, PP for the State. -- Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material available on record. It is submitted that the petitioner is in judicial custody in connection with FIR No.44/2011, of Police Station- Anandpur Kalu, District Pali for the offence u/s 457 and 380 of IPC. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no recovery or investigation is to made from the petitioner now, and he is in judicial custody since his arrest. He, therefore, prayed that petitioner may also be enlarged on bail. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that the petitioner is not entitled for bail. Having regard to the nature ...
Om Prakash @ Oma Ram Vs. State
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Jun-28-2012
1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.4643/2012 Om Prakash @ Oma Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan Date of Order:28. 06/2012. PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS, V.J.Mr. B.S. Rathore, for the petitioner. Mr. Mahipal Bishnoi, PP for the State. -- Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material available on record. It is submitted that the petitioner is in judicial custody in connection with FIR No.149/2012, of Police Station- Basni, District- Jodhpur for the offence u/s 458, 380, 342 and 323 of IPC. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that co- accused, namely, Bhikha Ram, and Virendra Punia @ Ram Niwas and Virendra Singh Rathore have already been enlarged on bail a coordinate bench of this Court vide the order dated 13.06.2012 in SB Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.4246/2012 and vide order dated 29.05.2012 in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail application N...
Pappu and anr Vs. State
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Jun-28-2012
1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.4653/2012 Pappu & Anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan Date of Order:28. 06/2012. PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS, V.J.Mr. Farzand Ali, for the petitioners. Mr. Mahipal Bishnoi, PP for the State. -- Heard learned counsel for the applicants and the learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material available on record. It is submitted that the petitioners are in judicial custody in connection with FIR No.283/2012, of Police Station- Nimbahera, District Chittorgarh, for the offence u/s 379 and 411 of IPC. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that challan has already been filed and the petitioners are in judicial custody since 17.05.2012, therefore, they may be enlarged on bail. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that the petitioners are not entitled for bail. Having regard to the nature of accusation and taking into c...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »