Satyanarayan Vs. State

Satyanarayan vs State

Type Court Judgment Court Rajasthan Jodhpur Decided Jun 28, 2012

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/973955

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/973955
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur High Court
Decided On: Jun 28, 2012
Subject: Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue: Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Satyanarayan

Respondent

State

Excerpt

.....counsel for the complainant and the learned public prosecutor and also perused the material available on record. it is submitted that the petitioner was arrested in connection with fir no.148/2012, of police station- ratanada, jodhpur, for the offence u/s 323, 341 and 307 of ipc. learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the although there is allegation of inflicting injury upon the stomach of the injured, however, that injury is simple in nature. he further submits that the petitioner is behind the bars since his arrest, therefore, he may be enlarged on bail. learned counsel for the complainant does not dispute the factual aspect of the matter. learned public prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail 2 of 2 application and submitted that the petitioner is not entitled for bail. having regard to the nature of accusation and taking into consideration totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, i deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused applicant on bail. accordingly, this bail application filed under sec.439 cr.p.c. is allowed and it is directed that the applicant, satyanarayan s/o manaram, shall be released on bail in connection with fir no.148/2012 of police station- ratanada, jodhpur, provided he executes a personal bond for a sum of rs.20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of rs.10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (gopal krishan vyas), v.j.dj/- 82

Full Judgment

1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.4539/2012 Satyanarayan Vs. State of Rajasthan Date of Order:

28. 06/2012. PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS, V.J.

Mr. Nadish Singhvi, for the petitioner. Mr. Mahipal Bishnoi, PP for the State. Mr. N.K. Bohra, for the complainant. -- Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the complainant and the learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material available on record. It is submitted that the petitioner was arrested in connection with FIR No.148/2012, of Police Station- Ratanada, Jodhpur, for the offence u/s 323, 341 and 307 of IPC. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the although there is allegation of inflicting injury upon the stomach of the injured, however, that injury is simple in nature. He further submits that the petitioner is behind the bars since his arrest, therefore, he may be enlarged on bail. Learned counsel for the complainant does not dispute the factual aspect of the matter. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail 2 of 2 application and submitted that the petitioner is not entitled for bail. Having regard to the nature of accusation and taking into consideration totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused applicant on bail. Accordingly, this bail application filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that the applicant, Satyanarayan S/o Manaram, shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.148/2012 of Police Station- Ratanada, Jodhpur, provided he executes a personal bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS), V.J.

DJ/- 82

Same Court & Year Rajasthan Jodhpur · 2012 Same Parties Satyanarayan vs State Same Subject Criminal