Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Jangir Singh and ors Vs. State

Jangir Singh and ors vs State

Type Court Judgment Court Rajasthan Jodhpur Decided Jun 28, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/973964

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Rajasthan Jodhpur High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Jangir Singh and ors

Respondent

State

Excerpt

1 of 2 in the high court of judicature for rajasthan at jodhpur order s.b. criminal misc. bail application no.4403/2012 jangir singh & ors. vs. state of rajasthan date of order:28. 06/2012. present hon'ble mr. justice gopal krishan vyas, v.j.mr. g.r. bhai on behalf of mr. s.k. poonia, for the petitioners. mr. anil upadhayay, pp for the state. -- heard learned counsel for the applicants and the learned public prosecutor and also perused the material available on record. it is submitted that the petitioners are in judicial custody in connection with fir no.95/2012, of police station- pallu, district- hanumangarh for the offence u/s 5, 6 and 8 of rajasthan bovine (prohibition of slaughter & export) act, 1995. learned counsel for the petitioners submits that no recovery is to be made from the petitioners and the investigation has also been completed, therefore, they may be enlarged on bail. learned public prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that the petitioners are not entitled for bail. having regard to the nature of accusation and taking into consideration totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, 2 of 2 without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, i deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused applicants on bail. accordingly, this bail application filed under sec.439 cr.p.c. is allowed and it is directed that the applicants, namely, (1) jangir singh s/o chandan singh, (2) rinku pandey s/o anand kumar and (3) raju sheikh @ gulamnabi s/o ishmail sheikh, shall be released on bail in connection with fir no.95/2012 of police station- pallu, district hanumangarh, provided each of them execute a personal bond for a sum of rs.20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of rs.10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for their appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (gopal krishan vyas), v.j.dj/- 60

Full Judgment

1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.4403/2012 Jangir Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan Date of Order:

28. 06/2012. PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS, V.J.

Mr. G.R. Bhai on behalf of Mr. S.K. Poonia, for the petitioners. Mr. Anil Upadhayay, PP for the State. -- Heard learned counsel for the applicants and the learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material available on record. It is submitted that the petitioners are in judicial custody in connection with FIR No.95/2012, of Police Station- Pallu, District- Hanumangarh for the offence u/s 5, 6 and 8 of Rajasthan Bovine (Prohibition of Slaughter & Export) Act, 1995. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that no recovery is to be made from the petitioners and the investigation has also been completed, therefore, they may be enlarged on bail. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that the petitioners are not entitled for bail. Having regard to the nature of accusation and taking into consideration totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, 2 of 2 without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused applicants on bail. Accordingly, this bail application filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that the applicants, namely, (1) Jangir Singh S/o Chandan Singh, (2) Rinku Pandey S/o Anand Kumar and (3) Raju Sheikh @ Gulamnabi S/o Ishmail Sheikh, shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.95/2012 of Police Station- Pallu, District Hanumangarh, provided each of them execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for their appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS), V.J.

DJ/- 60

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial