Patna Court May 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Md. NuraIn Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-19-2012
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38493 of 2011 (3) dt.19-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.38493 of 2011 ====================================================== Md. Nurain, S/O-Laddu Miyan .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA19. 01-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is in jail custody since 19.09.2011 in a case registered under Sections 341, 324, 326, 379, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code on the allegation that he gave Bakhua blow that is a sharp cutting weapon to the informant as a result of which the tip of right thumb of the informant was amputated. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as w...
Mahadeo Safi Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1984 of 2012 Mahadeo Safi Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 02. 19.01.2012 Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences under Sections 409 of the I.P.C. It is alleged that petitioner collected rent to the tune of Rs. 12,177/- but deposited only Rs. 1450/- and hence he defalcated Rs. 10,727/-. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner subsequently deposited the defalcated amount. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner namely Mahadeo Safi, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani in connection with Phulparas P.S. Case No. 237 of 2007. Shageer ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)...
Mahesh Kumar Roy @ Mahesh Kumar Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-19-2012
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40430 of 2011 (3) dt.19-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.40430 of 2011 ====================================================== Mahesh Kumar Roy @ Mahesh Kumar, S/O-Sri Ramjeevan Rai .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA19. 01-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The name of petitioner came in confessional statement of co-accused Laxman Kumar who was caught at the spot along with looted mobile and motorcycle. The aforesaid Laxman Kumar disclosed the name of the petitioner and one Sanjeev Kumar as his associates and according to prosecution case, the alleged occurrence took place on 22.1...
Pradeep Kumar and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.17473 of 2011 ====================================================== Pradeep Kumar & Ors. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH19. 01-2012 The petitioner was granted bail on 28.06.2011 in connection with Bhagwan Bazar P.S. Case No. 24/11 which was registered under Sections 342, 504 and 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code but by inadvertence Section 307 of the IPC could not be mentioned in the order sheet. Let in the last portion of third paragraph the word paradised may be read as paralyzed. The order dated 28.06.2011 stands modified to the extent as indicated above. It is submitted that since one of the provisions of the IPC was not mentioned in the order dated 28.06.2011, the bail bond of the petitioner has been provisionall...
Phoolo Rai Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.43383 of 2011 ====================================================== Phoolo Rai, son of Shibu Rai .... .... Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== 4. 19.01.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 156(3) of Cr. P.C., Sections 420, 376 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3(x) of the SC/ST Act Considering that initially final report was submitted in the matter whereas the case proceeded on protest cum complaint petition, let the petitioner in the event of surrender, named above, within four weeks from the date of receipt of this order, in connection with Samastipur Town SC/ST P.S. Case No. 09 of 2006, shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each...
Surendra Singh and anr. Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Appeal (DB) No 1162 of 2011 Gajendra Singh Versus The State Of Bihar WITH Criminal Appeal (DB) No 1143 o1. Surendra Singh 2 Rabindra Singh Versus The State Of Bihar -----------------19. 01.2012 These appeals will be heard alongwith Cr Appeals No 1141 and 1050 of 2011 in which records have already been called for and received as they arise from the same judgment. Informant has entered appearance. Heard Shri Rana Pratap Singh, learned Senior Counsel in support of appellant Surendra Singh. It is stated that as per the deposition of the informant in Court, he had assaulted with a sword on the head of the deceased Santosh Singh. As per post mortem report, the injury on the head is only bone deep. So far as appellant Rabindra Singh is concerned, he is alleged to have assaulted the deceased Santosh Singh with a knife on his panjra but there is no injury there. So far as appellant Gajendra Singh is concerned, in the fardbayan, it is not specifi...
Kameshwar Singh Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-19-2012
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.39841 of 2011 (3) dt.19-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.39841 of 2011 ====================================================== Kameshwar Singh, son of late Mangal Singh .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s =====================================================19. 01-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is in jail custody since 14.06.2011 in a case registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 307 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code. Although, petitioner is named in the First Information Report but no specific overt act has been attributed against him. Rather, it is stated that he along with four other persons rained lathis on deceased persons. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that in course of investigation, the fardbeyan of one of the deceased was recorded at para 99 of t...
Samshul Bashar @ Masoom Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-19-2012
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.961 of 2012 (2) dt.19-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.961 of 2012 ====================================================== Sahjad .... .... Petitioner. Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party. ====================================================== with Criminal Miscellaneous No.1549 of 2012 ====================================================== Samshul Bashar @ Masoom .... .... Petitioner. Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH19. 01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are languishing in custody since 05.08.2011 and 13.12.2010 respectively in a case registered for the offence under Sections 20, 21 and 22 of the N. D. P. S. Act. For the alleged occurrence, three cases were lodged. First one u...
Md. Mohibule Rahman and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1965 of 2012 Md. Mohibule Rahman & Ors. Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 02. 19.01.2012 Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences under Sections 364 of the I.P.C. The accusation is of abducting the son of the informant. It appears that the occurrence is of 27.07.2011 for which the complaint was filed on 29.07.2011 which came to be registered as police case on 18.08.2011 whereas on 17.08.2011 the victim filed a petition before learned Court below that under some misconception the complaint was lodged. It is submitted that much prior to the occurrence, on 01.07.2011 the petitioners side lodged a case against the informants side under Section 307 I.P.C. Considering the inconsistent stand of the victim and the delayed lodging of the complaint, let the petitioners namely 1. Md. Mohibule Rahman 2. Md. Islam 3. Md. Israil, in the event of their arrest or surrend...
Md. Reyaz Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.2683 of 2012 Md. Reyaz, son of Md. Israil, resident of Village- Bherokhra, P.S. Tajpur, District- Samastipur. ..Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar .Opposite Party. ---------------------------------- 2.19. 01. 2012. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the informant as also learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Samastipur Nagar (Mufassil) P.S. Case No. 621 of 2010, registered under Sections 420, 406, 376, 504 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that husband of the complainant died. Thereafter, she was appointed as Agan Bari Sevika and started living at New Colony Dharampur. It is further alleged that she came in contact with the petitioner. She gave money to the petitioner for opening a shop for his livelihood and it is alleged that in the meantime intimacy has grown up between the complainant and the petitioner. She permitt...
- ‹ Prev
- 83
- 84
- 85
- 86
- 87
- 89
- 90
- 91
- 92
- 93
- Next ›
- Last »