Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Pradeep Kumar and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar

Pradeep Kumar and ors. vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 19, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/975257

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Pradeep Kumar and ors.

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.17473 of 2011 ====================================================== pradeep kumar & ors. .... .... petitioner/s versus the state of bihar .... .... opposite party/s ====================================================== coram: honourable mr. justice dinesh kumar singh oral order (per: honourable mr. justice dinesh kumar singh”19. 01-2012 the petitioner was granted bail on 28.06.2011 in connection with bhagwan bazar p.s. case no. 24/11 which was registered under sections 342, 504 and 307/34 of the indian penal code but by inadvertence section 307 of the ipc could not be mentioned in the order sheet. let in the last portion of third paragraph the word paradised may be read as paralyzed. the order dated 28.06.2011 stands modified to the extent as indicated above. it is submitted that since one of the provisions of the ipc was not mentioned in the order dated 28.06.2011, the bail bond of the petitioner has been provisionally accepted by learned court below, this court highly deprecates this attitude of the learned lower court. patna high court cr.misc. no.17473 of 2011 (4) dt.19-01-201 2/22 let the order be transmitted to the learned court below through fax at the cost of the petitioner. (dinesh kumar singh, j.) amrendra

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.17473 of 2011 ====================================================== Pradeep Kumar & Ors. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH”

19. 01-2012 The petitioner was granted bail on 28.06.2011 in connection with Bhagwan Bazar P.S. Case No. 24/11 which was registered under Sections 342, 504 and 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code but by inadvertence Section 307 of the IPC could not be mentioned in the order sheet. Let in the last portion of third paragraph the word paradised may be read as paralyzed. The order dated 28.06.2011 stands modified to the extent as indicated above. It is submitted that since one of the provisions of the IPC was not mentioned in the order dated 28.06.2011, the bail bond of the petitioner has been provisionally accepted by learned court below, this Court highly deprecates this attitude of the learned lower court. Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.17473 of 2011 (4) dt.19-01-201 2/22 Let the order be transmitted to the learned court below through fax at the cost of the petitioner. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.) Amrendra

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial