Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Md. Reyaz Vs. the State of Bihar

Md. Reyaz vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 19, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/975350

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Md. Reyaz

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

.....thereafter, she was appointed as agan bari sevika and started living at new colony dharampur. it is further alleged that she came in contact with the petitioner. she gave money to the petitioner for opening a shop for his livelihood and it is alleged that in the meantime intimacy has grown up between the complainant and the petitioner. she permitted the petitioner to have sexual intercourse on pretext that he will marry and said relationship continued. it is alleged that after taking money, the petitioner is not ready to return the money even he refuse to marry the 2 complainant. however, the complainant is not minor and she is well versed lady. hence when she alleged to have sexual intercourse with the petitioner she must have known the consequence and not reporting the matter at the earliest when there is sufficient opportunity. having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of four weeks from today, the petitioner shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the chief judicial magistrate, samastipur, in connection with samastipur nagar (mufassil) p.s. case no. 621 of 2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438 (2) of cr.p.c. m.p. ( gopal prasad, j.)

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.2683 of 2012 Md. Reyaz, son of Md. Israil, resident of Village- Bherokhra, P.S. Tajpur, District- Samastipur. ..Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar .Opposite Party. ---------------------------------- 2.

19. 01. 2012. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the informant as also learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Samastipur Nagar (Mufassil) P.S. Case No. 621 of 2010, registered under Sections 420, 406, 376, 504 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that husband of the complainant died. Thereafter, she was appointed as Agan Bari Sevika and started living at New Colony Dharampur. It is further alleged that she came in contact with the petitioner. She gave money to the petitioner for opening a shop for his livelihood and it is alleged that in the meantime intimacy has grown up between the complainant and the petitioner. She permitted the petitioner to have sexual intercourse on pretext that he will marry and said relationship continued. It is alleged that after taking money, the petitioner is not ready to return the money even he refuse to marry the 2 complainant. However, the complainant is not minor and she is well versed lady. Hence when she alleged to have sexual intercourse with the petitioner she must have known the consequence and not reporting the matter at the earliest when there is sufficient opportunity. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioner in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of four weeks from today, the petitioner shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur, in connection with Samastipur Nagar (Mufassil) P.S. Case No. 621 of 2010, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of Cr.P.C. m.p. ( Gopal Prasad, J.)

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial