Patna Court May 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Raj Narayan Singh Vs. the State of Bihar and ors
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-23-2012
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2702 of 2012 (2) dt.23-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.2702 of 2012 ====================================================== Raj Narayan Singh .... .... Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== 02. 23-01-2012 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to add the victim girl Kavita Kumari as opposite party no. 5 to the present proceedings during the course of the day. The petitioner seeks custody of opposite party no. 5 who is admittedly his daughter but is stated to have been living with opposite party no. 2 after getting married to him. The prayer of the petitioner having been rejected by the Magistrate as well as the learned District and Sessions Judge, Buxar, hence the present application. The only claim of the petitioner is that his daughter is a minor and which claim is based upon a certificate issued on a plain sheet by the H...
Pawan Yadav Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-23-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.38655 of 2011 Pawan Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar with Criminal Miscellaneous No.39982 of 2011 Bhikhari Sahni Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------23. 01-2012 Both the above-said Cr. Misc. Cases arise out of Town P.S. Case No. 76 of 2010 registered under Section-396 of the IPC and accordingly, both the above- said petitions are being disposed of by this common order. Counsel for the petitioner in Cr. Misc. No. 38655 of 2011 is permitted to make necessary correction in the prayer portion in course of the day. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioners are not named in the first information report but their name came in this case in course of investigation and, allegedly, some looted mobiles were recovered from the house of petitioner in Cr. Misc. No. 38655 of 2011 but learned counsel appearing for the aforesaid petitioner drew my c...
Ashok Singh and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-23-2012
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41033 of 2011 (3) dt.23-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.41033 of 2011 =================================================== 1. Ashok Singh, 2. Rakesh Singh, Both sons of late Maho Yadav 3. Ruby Devi, wife of Rakesh Singh 4. Girja Devi, wife of Maho Yadav .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s =================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AKHILESH CHANDRA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AKHILESH CHANDRA23. 01-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the informant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The four petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with Athmalgola P.S. Case No. 73/2011 for the offences under Sections 498(A), 304(B), 201 and 120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code, are named accused in this case being in-laws of sister of the informant who is missing along with one child ...
Suresh Mahto Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-23-2012
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3207 of 2012 (2) dt.23-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.3207 of 2012 ====================================================== Suresh Mahto, son of Daroga Mahto, resident of Village- Kushahi, P.S.- Motipur, District- Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party. CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL PRASAD ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL PRASAD23. 01-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with Motipur P.S. Case No. 153 of 2008, registered for offence under Section 363 and 365 of the Indian Penal Code. There is allegation that one Lalan Mahto and his wife kept the daughter of the informant and they took his daughter to the sasural of Lalan Mahto. In this connection there was Panchayati and in Panchayati Lalan Mahto, his wife and this petitioner disclosed that they will enquire abo...
Binkatesh Singh @ Jhariman Pahalwan Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-23-2012
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.36719 of 2011 (5) dt.23-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.36719 of 2011 ====================================================== Binkatesh Singh @ Jhariman Pahalwan, S/O-Late Jagdish Singh .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA23. 01-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. There is specific allegation against this petitioner that he caused firearm injury on the chest of the informant. The injury report of injured is available. The injury report does not corroborate the allegation because no injury has been found on the chest of the informant. Although, petitioner carries some criminal antece...
Mukhtar Mian@mukhtar Miyan Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-23-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.3143 of 2012 Mukhtar Mian@Mukhtar Miyan, son of Sultan Mian, resident of village Kanhauli Manohar (Tole Karta Ram), P.S. Baniyapur, district Chapra (Saran) .. Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar .. Opposite party **** /2/ 23 January, Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 2012 No one appears for the State. This is a petition for grant of regular bail for offence under Sections 363, 366A, 365, 368 and 372/34 of the Penal Code. The allegation is that the petitioner has kidnapped the victim. However, the victim in her statement under Section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code has stated that she went to Raipur by train on her own sweat will and none having enticed her and she lived with Mukhtar Mian for four months. On the information about lodging the case he sent her to fathers home. Hence, having regard to the facts and circumstances, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing ...
Kartik Yadav and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-23-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.37635 of 2011 ====================================================== 1.Kartik Yadav, Son of late Budhu Yadav. 2.Shibal Yadav, Son of late Banshi Yadav. 3.Kailu Yadav, Son of late Banshi Yadav. 4.Chhabu Yadav, Son of late Banshi Yadav. 5.Sunil Yadav, Son of Baldeo Yadav. 6.Pairiya Devi, Wife of Bijay Yadav. 7.Tinku Devi, Wife of Buno Yadav. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AKHILESH CHANDRA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AKHILESH CHANDRA23. 01-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, who is armed with carbon/xerox copy of the case diary up to paragraph 82 dated 08/07/2010. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302, 328/34 of the Indian Penal...
Ashok Yadav Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-23-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.38721 of 2011 Ashok Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------23. 01-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner is in custody in a case registered under Sections-147, 148, 149 & 302 of the Indian Penal Code as well as 27 of the Arms Act. The informant claimed herself to be an eye witness of the alleged occurrence. She states that the petitioner alongwith other FIR named accused persons came near the place of occurrence and entered the house of deceased and after that, the informant heard three sound of firing. Later on, she went in the room in which the alleged occurrence took place. She found that the deceased was lying dead having three fire-arm injuries on her head. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that in course of investigation, only one fire-arm injury was found on the person of the deceased and,...
Shailendra Kumar @ Ganour Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-23-2012
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1177 of 2012 (2) dt.23-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1177 of 2012 ====================================================== Shailendra Kumar @ Ganour .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH23. 01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 14.12.2011 in a case registered under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. The name of the petitioner sprang up on the confession of the co-accused. It is submitted that no recovery has been made from the petitioner and the petitioner is the accused in one other case also. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing the bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with t...
Sandeep Kumar Chauhan Vs. the State of Bihar and anr.
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-23-2012
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1933 of 2012 (2) dt.23-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1933 of 2012 ====================================================== Sandeep Kumar Chauhan .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH23. 01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the husband is apprehending his arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Sections 323, 379 and 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Though, the accusation is of demand of dowry and torture but the petitioner is still ready to keep the complainant as wife with full dignity and honour. It appears that the petitioner has also filed a restitution case in which the complainant has alr...
- ‹ Prev
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 71
- 72
- 73
- 74
- 75
- Next ›
- Last »