Patna Court May 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Surender Prasad Vs. Anil Kumar Verma and ors
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-11-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA First Appeal No.231 of 1996 Surender Prasad Versus Anil Kumar Verma & Ors ---------------------------------- 24. 11.01.2012 Heard the learned counsel for the appellant on I.A. No.4464 of 2011. This application has been filed for substitution of the legal representatives of the deceased sole appellant. Prayer for setting aside abatement has also been made in the application. The learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the legal representatives had no knowledge about the procedural law and, therefore, within the time stipulated, they did not contact their counsel for substitution. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case and the explanation given in the substitution application, I am satisfied that the appellants were prevented by sufficient cause from not filing the substitution application within 90 days from the date of death. Accordingly, the abatement is set aside and the substitution application is allowed. The lega...
Haider Ali @ Sheikh Haider Vs. the State of Bihar and anr
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-11-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1553 of 2012 Haider Ali @ Sheikh Haider Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr ---------------------------------- 02. 11.01.2012. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with a case in which cognizance has been taken of the offence punishable under Section 498A of the IPC. It is submitted that admittedly the marriage took place 12 years ago. The complainant herself admits that she was kept well in her matrimonial home for ten years and after ten years she was being subjected to cruelty for demand of Rs.25,000/-. The contention is that the petitioner has falsely been implicated due to matrimonial discord and it is highly improbable and unbelievable that the petitioner would demand dowry after ten years of marriage. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, namely, Haider Ali @ Sheikh Haider in...
Vishnu Pd. Singh Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-11-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.687 of 2012 Vishnu Pd. Singh Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 2/ 11.1.2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the husband is apprehending his arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The petitioner is ready to keep the complainant as wife with full dignity and honour. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioner be released on provisional anticipatory bail for one year in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing the bail bond of Rs.10000/(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Bikramganj (Rohtas) in Complaint Case no. 475 of 2011 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of ...
Md. Mustafa Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-11-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.818 of 2012 Md. Mustafa Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 02. 11.01.2012 Petitioner being husband is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences under Sections 498A/34 of the I.P.C. and Section of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The accusations are of demand of dowry and torture. The marriage was performed on 04.05.2008. It is submitted that petitioner divorced his wife through Imarat-e-Shariah on 17.04.2010 and has also filed divorce case before learned Principal Judge, Family Court on 04.09.2009 in which the other side has already appeared when the present case was filed on 01.11.2010. Considering the fact that divorce case was filed at earlier point of time, let the petitioner namely Md. Mustafa, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thou...
Bindeshwari Ram Vs. the State of Bihar and ors
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-11-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.514 o1. Bindeshwari Ram S/O Late Rup Lal Ram R/O Village + P.O.- Asharhi, P.S.- Hilsa, District- Nalanda Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna 3. Magadh University, Bodh Gaya through its Registrar 4. Vice Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya 5. Registrar, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya 6. Finance Officer, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya 7. Principal, S.U. College, Hilsa, P.S.- Hilsa, District- Nalanda ---------------------------------11. 01.2012 Petitioner claims to be appointed in the College on a class-IV post in 1981 when the College was under private management. He claims that he was paid his salary by the management till October, 1992 whereafter it was stopped. The College was later on take-over as constituent unit of the University and the management of the College submitted a list of teaching and non-teaching employees of the Colleg...
Rahul Kumar Rai @ Rahul Rai Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-11-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.32745 of 2011 Rahul Kumar Rai @ Rahul Rai, S/o Ashok Kumar Rai, R/o village-Jamuaon, P.S. Piro, District-Bhojpur Versus The State of Bihar ---------------------------------- 03. 11.01.2012 Heard the parties. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Charpokhari P.S. Case No. 24 of 2011 for offence punishable under Sections 394 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that even in absence of any recovery from the petitioner nor the petitioner having put on T.I. Parade, the petitioner having a clean antecedent has remained in custody since 31.07.2011 for the alleged offence. The F.I.R. was instituted against unknown and the name of the petitioner has transpired during the course of the investigation. Considering the submissions of learned counsel, let the petitioner Rahul Kumar Rai @ Rahul Rai be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) each with two...
Chhotu Ram @ Chhotu Kumar Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-11-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Revision No.53 of 2012 Chhotu Ram @ Chhotu Kumar, son of Nagendra Ram, resident of Vill. Gonsa, P.S. Jehanabad, Dist. Jehanabad. ..................Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar. .......Opp. Party ---------------------------------11. 01-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The present application has been filed for grant of bail to the petitioner under the provisions of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000. Earlier such prayer was rejected by the Juvenile Justice Board, Jehanabad by order dated 14.10.2011 and the appeal filed was also rejected by order dated 23.11.2011 in Criminal Appeal No. 38/2011 by the District and Sessions Judge, Jehanabad. The petitioner is an accused in Jehanabad P.S. Case No. 246 of 2011, G.R. No. 1049/2011 registered under Sections 363, 366 (A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submit...
istehar Ansari Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-11-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.816 of 2012 Istehar Ansari Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 02. 11.01.2012 Petitioner being husband is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences under Sections 447, 341, 498A, 504, 379, 506/34 of the I.P.C. and Section of the Dowry Prohibition Act. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is ready to keep the informant as wife with full dignity and honour. Considering the aforesaid circumstance, let the petitioner namely Istehar Ansari, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, be released on provisional anticipatory bail for one year, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Bettiah Mufassil(Manuapul) P.S. Case No. 91 of 2011. Let...
Dr. Anil Sharma and ors Vs. the State of Bihar and ors
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-11-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.5203 of 2010 Dr. Kanhaiya Jee Jha Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors. ---------------------------------- with Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.659 of 2011 Chandra Bhushan Pd. Singh Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors. ---------------------------------- with Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1430 of 2011 Dr. Rajeshwar Singh Versus Dr. Arbind Kumar ,The Vice Cha ---------------------------------- with Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.384 of 2011 Ram Mohan Prasad Mehta Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors. ---------------------------------- with Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.521 of 2011 Prabhakar Mahto Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors. ---------------------------------- with Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.616 of 2011 Dr. Ram Naresh Chandra Singh Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors. ---------------------------------- with Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1734 of 2011 Anant Mohan Jha Versus The Bhupendra Narayan Mand...
Liladhar Shahu Vs. the State of Bihar and ors
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-11-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3788 of 2011 Liladhar Shahu Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ---------------------------------- 4. 11.01.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the opposite parties. The Chief Engineer and the Executive Engineer are also present in person. The petitioner was absorbed in the regular establishment on 30.11.2006 and then reverted to daily wage status on 8.11.2007. The Court held that the order for reversion was cryptic and non-speaking. Reasons were the control on arbitrariness. These principles of administrative law were not new but decades old. If the respondents insist on passing orders contrary to well settled law, the Court has little option but to set aside the order. The order of reversion dated 8.11.2007 was set aside. Counsel for the petitioner submits that reinstatement in the absorbed post has not followed till date making the action contemptuous. Counsel for the State submits that there was n...