Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Rahul Kumar Rai @ Rahul Rai Vs. the State of Bihar

Rahul Kumar Rai @ Rahul Rai vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 11, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/975167

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rahul Kumar Rai @ Rahul Rai

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.32745 of 2011 rahul kumar rai @ rahul rai, s/o ashok kumar rai, r/o village-jamuaon, p.s. piro, district-bhojpur versus the state of bihar ---------------------------------- 03. 11.01.2012 heard the parties. the petitioner is in custody in connection with charpokhari p.s. case no. 24 of 2011 for offence punishable under sections 394 of the indian penal code. learned counsel for the petitioner submits that even in absence of any recovery from the petitioner nor the petitioner having put on t.i. parade, the petitioner having a clean antecedent has remained in custody since 31.07.2011 for the alleged offence. the f.i.r. was instituted against unknown and the name of the petitioner has transpired during the course of the investigation. considering the submissions of learned counsel, let the petitioner rahul kumar rai @ rahul rai be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned chief judicial magistrate, bhojpur at ara in connection with charpokhari p.s. case no. 24 of 2011. (jyoti saran, j.) s.sb/-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.32745 of 2011 Rahul Kumar Rai @ Rahul Rai, S/o Ashok Kumar Rai, R/o village-Jamuaon, P.S. Piro, District-Bhojpur Versus The State of Bihar ---------------------------------- 03. 11.01.2012 Heard the parties. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Charpokhari P.S. Case No. 24 of 2011 for offence punishable under Sections 394 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that even in absence of any recovery from the petitioner nor the petitioner having put on T.I. Parade, the petitioner having a clean antecedent has remained in custody since 31.07.2011 for the alleged offence. The F.I.R. was instituted against unknown and the name of the petitioner has transpired during the course of the investigation. Considering the submissions of learned counsel, let the petitioner Rahul Kumar Rai @ Rahul Rai be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara in connection with Charpokhari P.S. Case No. 24 of 2011. (Jyoti Saran, J.) S.Sb/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial