Patna Court May 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dharnidhar Roy Vs. the State of Bihar and ors
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-11-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1883 of 2007 Dharnidhar Roy son of late Vishundeo Roy, resident of village Kharhiya, P.S. Hasanpur, District Samastipur.. Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Bihar, 2. Commissioner, Darbhanga Division, Darbhanga, 3. The Collector, Samastipur, 4. The Sub-divisional Officer, Rosera, Samastipur, 5. Block Supply Officer, Hasanpur, Samastipur, 6. Ram Balak Yadav son of Sri Rajendra Yadav, resident of village Dhudhpura, P.S. Hasanpur, Samastipur, .. Respondents For the Petitioner: M/s Navin Pd. Singh and Narayan Singh, Advocates For the State: Mr. Santosh Kumar, AC to GP 9 ------11. 01.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 19.08.2003 passed by the Sub-divisional Officer, Rosera, Samastipur(respondent no.4) as contained in Annexure 5, whereby his licence granted under Bihar Trade Articles (Licences Unification) Order, 1984 has been cancelled and also the app...
Bijendra Gupta @ Bijendra Kumar Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-11-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1497 of 2012 Bijendra Gupta @ Bijendra Kumar son of Hari Shankar Gupta, resident of village Bangav Bazar,P.S.Bajpatti,Distt.Sitamarhi Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- For the petitioner : Mr.Alok Kr.Sinha For the State : Mr.S.C.Mishra,APP ------ 02/ 11.01.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case which has been registered for offence under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act. It has been submitted that out of two accused, one accused namely, Sudhir Kuwar alias Sudhir Kumar having similar allegation has been admitted to bail by a Bench of this Court Vide Cr.Misc.No. 41030 of 2011 on 07.12.2011. Considering the facts and 2 circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount eac...
Anant Mohan Jha Vs. the Bhupendra Narayan Mandal U
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-11-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.5203 of 2010 Dr. Kanhaiya Jee Jha Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors. ---------------------------------- with Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.659 of 2011 Chandra Bhushan Pd. Singh Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors. ---------------------------------- with Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1430 of 2011 Dr. Rajeshwar Singh Versus Dr. Arbind Kumar ,The Vice Cha ---------------------------------- with Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.384 of 2011 Ram Mohan Prasad Mehta Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors. ---------------------------------- with Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.521 of 2011 Prabhakar Mahto Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors. ---------------------------------- with Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.616 of 2011 Dr. Ram Naresh Chandra Singh Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors. ---------------------------------- with Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1734 of 2011 Anant Mohan Jha Versus The Bhupendra Narayan Mand...
Ram Sakal Singh and anr. Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-11-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.520 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Ram Sakal Singh.2. Kewala Devi. .... .... Petitioners Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s =====================================================11. 01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners being the parents of the husband are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Section 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The marriage was performed in the year 2007 and accusations are of demand of motorcycle and torture. It appears that when the victim committed suicide the UD case has been registered but subsequently after eight days of the registration of the UD case the present case has been lodged by filing the complaint which was subsequently registered as a police case. It appears from the complaint that there is no specific accusation against these petitioners. Considering the aforesaid fact...
Jogi Ram and ors Vs. Hari Ram and ors
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-11-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Second Appeal No.437 of 2008 Jogi Ram & Ors Versus Hari Ram & Ors ---------------------------------11. -1-2012 Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants in support of this appeal. The plaintiffs are the appellants in this appeal against the judgment of affirmance. The suit has been filed for declaration of title and for declaration that the recent survey Khatiyan with regard to the suit land prepared in the names of defendant 2nd set is wrong. The plaintiffs case, in short, is that the suit land has been allotted to the plaintiffs in partition in their family and they are coming in joint possession, but the Shebait of the defendant 2nd set has got the said land recorded in the names of defendant 2nd set in the recent survey proceeding collusively. It is the case of the plaintiffs that there has never been any temple or Pindi of the deities Sri Ganesh Jee Bhagwan or Sri Shankar Jee Bhagwan over the suit land, which has also ...
Surendra Mishra @ Chhotu Mishra Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-11-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1502 of 2012 Surendra Mishra @ Chhotu Mishra son of Harendra Mishra at Sohnipatti(Buxar), P.S.Buxar(T),District Buxar Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 02/ 11.01.2012 Heard Mr. Aadityanath Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Dr.Kumar Uday Pratap, learned APP for the State. The petitioner is an accused of a case which has been registered for offences under Sections 385 and 387 of the Indian Penal code. The informant received a phone call from unknown person that if he wants to open the shop, then he will have to pay the amount. The present first information report was registered on the basis of the written repo0rt. Submission is that the petitioners complicity has come up 2 only on the basis of confessional statement. The petitioner has no telephone or mobile, so he cannot be linked with raising any demand through phone and mobile. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case,...
Sarveshwar Pandey and ors Vs. the State of Bihar and ors
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-11-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3336 of 2011 Sarveshwar Pandey & Ors Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ---------------------------------- 5. 11.01.2012 Counsel for the petitioner with reference to the representation filed at Annexure-2 submits that all the three petitioners had filed their objection. Annexure-C to the show cause, the report of the Executive Engineer refers only to petitioner no. 1 having filed an objection. Even that report is inconclusive and recognizes that certain persons have objected while others have voluntarily given their lands. There is no finding that the lands of the petitioners have been intruded only to the extent permissible of two feet, by the order of the Court. The Court requires the District Magistrate to place before the Court the reasons and speaking order that may have finally been passed by him after consideration of the objections in light of the direction contained in the order of the Court. At the reque...
Prof. Arun Pd. Singh Vs. Dr. Arbind Kumar ,The Vice Cha
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-11-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.5203 of 2010 Dr. Kanhaiya Jee Jha Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors. ---------------------------------- with Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.659 of 2011 Chandra Bhushan Pd. Singh Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors. ---------------------------------- with Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1430 of 2011 Dr. Rajeshwar Singh Versus Dr. Arbind Kumar ,The Vice Cha ---------------------------------- with Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.384 of 2011 Ram Mohan Prasad Mehta Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors. ---------------------------------- with Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.521 of 2011 Prabhakar Mahto Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors. ---------------------------------- with Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.616 of 2011 Dr. Ram Naresh Chandra Singh Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors. ---------------------------------- with Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1734 of 2011 Anant Mohan Jha Versus The Bhupendra Narayan Mand...
Muchkund Thakur and ors Vs. the State of Bihar and ors
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-11-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.5203 of 2010 Dr. Kanhaiya Jee Jha Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors. ---------------------------------- with Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.659 of 2011 Chandra Bhushan Pd. Singh Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors. ---------------------------------- with Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1430 of 2011 Dr. Rajeshwar Singh Versus Dr. Arbind Kumar ,The Vice Cha ---------------------------------- with Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.384 of 2011 Ram Mohan Prasad Mehta Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors. ---------------------------------- with Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.521 of 2011 Prabhakar Mahto Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors. ---------------------------------- with Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.616 of 2011 Dr. Ram Naresh Chandra Singh Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors. ---------------------------------- with Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1734 of 2011 Anant Mohan Jha Versus The Bhupendra Narayan Mand...
Murtaza Khan Vs. the State of Bihar and ors
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-11-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.539 of 2012 Murtaza Khan Son Of Late Subedar Khan Resident Of Nouhata, P.S. Nouhata, District-Saharsa Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. The Commissioner, Kosi Division, Saharsa 3. The District Magistrate, Saharsa 4. The Deputy Collector Land Reforms-Cum-Land Dispute Redressal Authority, Saharsa 5. The Circle Officer, Nouhata, District-Saharsa 6. Mustaffa Khan S/O Late Subedar Khan Resident Of Nouhata, P.S. Nauhatta, District-Saharsa 7. Maksud Alam Son Of Mustaffa Khan Resident Of Nouhata, P.S. Nauhatta, District-Saharsa 8. Istiaque Khan, Son Of Mustaffa Khan Resident Of Nouhata, P.S. Nauhatta, District-Saharsa 9. Asfaque Khan Son Of Mustaffa Khan Resident Of Nouhata, P.S. Nauhatta, District-Saharsa 10. Mansur Khan Son Of Mustaffa Khan Resident Of Nouhata, P.S. Nauhatta, District-Saharsa ---------------------------------11. 01-2012 Admit. Issue notice to private respondents under registered cover with A/D as well as ...
- ‹ Prev
- 217
- 218
- 219
- 220
- 221
- 222
- 223
- 225
- 226
- 227
- Next ›
- Last »