Patna Court May 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mukesh Sahni and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-11-2012
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.39655 o1. Mukesh Sahni S/o Kishori Sahni, 2. Shravan Sahni, S/o Raja Sahni, 3. Meghnath Sahni, S/o Kailash Sahni. All R/o Village- Panchtaki Ram, P.S. Bairgania, District-Sitamarhi. --Petitioners Versus The State Of Bihar --Opp.Part11. 01.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. All the petitioners are named accused in this case of assault relating to land dispute wherein wife of the informant had to loose her life. Submission is of general and omnibus allegation. Nothing specific is attributed against the petitioners or any one else. Further the deceased sustained only one injury caused by hard and blunt substance which proved fatal but nothing specifically against the auther. Further the petitioners have no criminal antecedent. If it is so, the petitioners, in the event of arrest or surrender within four weeks, are directed to 2 be enlarged on bail on fur...
Md. Naseem @ Naseem and anr. Vs. the State of Bihar and anr
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-11-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.784 o1. Md. Naseem @ Naseem Mian, 2. Meharun Khatoon Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr ---------------------------------- 2/ 11.1.2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioner no. 1 being the husband and petitioner no. 2 being mother of petitioner no. 1 are apprehending their arrest in Complaint Case no. 649 of 2010 in which cognizance has been taken under section 498A of the Indian Penal Code pending in the court of J.M. Ist Class, Sherghati, Gaya. Petitioner no. 1 is ready to keep his wife with full dignity and honour. Seeing the stand of petitioner no. 1, let the above named petitioner no. 2 be released on bail in the event of her arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing the bail bond of Rs.10000/(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of J.M. Ist Class, Sherghati, Gaya in the aboveme...
Sita Ram Sah @ Sao and Anrs. Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-11-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.21160 o1. Sita Ram Sah @ Sao 2. Kapildeo Sah @ Sao, both sons of Meghu Sah @ Sao, resident of village Malaypur, P.S. Barhat, District Jamui. .. Petitioners Versus The State Of Bihar . Opp. Party ---------------------------------11. 01.2012 Heard Sri Prakash Mahto, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Anil Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor. The petitioners invoking inherent jurisdiction of this court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has prayed for quashing of an order passed by learned Sessions Judge in Cr. Revision No. 81 of 2011 whereby the learned Sessions Judge has affirmed the order dated 18.02.2011 passed by learned Assistant Sessions Judge 1st, Munger in Sessions Case No. 51 of 2005 arising out of Kharagpur P.S. Case No. 174 of 2001. By the said order the learned Assistant Sessions Judge has rejected the petition filed on behalf of the petitioners under Section 228 of the Cr.P.C....
Aamir Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-11-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.725 of 2012 Aamir Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 2/ 11.1.2012 Heard Mr. B.N.P. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Dr. Indiwar Kumar, learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in Complaint Case No. CA 342.of 2009 in which cognizance has been taken under sections 376, 323 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that initially forceful physical relationship was established by the petitioner with the complainant in March, 2009 and thereafter, on promise to marry, the physical relationship was established. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the complaint petition does not reflect that any medical examination of the victim was done. Considering the fact that the complainant being major, consented for physical relationship for several months in anticipation of marriage and on account of that the accusation under section 3...
Kanti Devi Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-11-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1411 of 2012 Kanti Devi, Wife of Raja Ram Yadav, Resident of Village- Karanpura, P.S.-Sigori, District-Patna. ..Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar ..Opposite Party. For the Petitioner : Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh-I, Advocate. For the State : APP. ---------------------------------- 02/ 11.01.2012 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The lady petitioner is one of the named accused of the case which has been registered under Sections 363, 366A/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The informants minor daughter disappeared and she was later on married with Congress Yadav. Submission is that the petitioner is Mosi of the victim. In fact, the informants daughter Rubi Kumari has married with Congress Yadav and she is happily living in his house. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with tw...
Ram Vilash Mahto @ Ram Bilash Mahto Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-11-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.42871 of 2011 Ram Vilash Mahto @ Ram Bilash Mahto son of Late Thakaiya Mahto R/O Vill. Tulapatti, P.S. Kishanpur, Distt. Supaul. Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 2. 11.1.2012. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Kishanpur (Supaul) P.S.Case No.118 of 2011/G.R.No.891 of 2011 for the offence punishable under sections 379 and 411/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering the submissions of the learned counsel that for the alleged offence, the petitioner having a clean antecedent, has remained in custody since 5.8.2011, let the petitioner Ram Vilash Mahto alias Rambilash Mahto be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul in connection with Kishanpur (Supaul) P.S.Case No.118 of 2011/G.R.No.891 of 2011. ahk (Jyoti Saran,...
Durga @ Rahul @ Durgesh Sharma Vs. State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-11-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.13667 of 2003 Durga @ Rahul @ Durgesh Sharma Versus State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- with Criminal Miscellaneous No.13722 of 2003 Chandi Lal @ Ranjan Kumar Versus State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 58/ 11.01.2012 Learned counsel for the State submits that in view of order dated 19.10.20121, a fresh first information report has been lodged by the S.H.O., Kotwali Police Station, who is the informant of this case on 13.12.2011 and the Investigating Officer of the same Police Station has been also appointed in this case and the same Deputy Superintendent of Police is supervising the case as per earlier direction of this Court. He also informs that steps have been taken by the authorities for amalgamation of both the first information reports in the instant case.2. From the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is apparent that the authorities are acting in accordance with the specific directi...
Satish Kumar Sharma Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-11-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No 1260 of 2011 Satish Kumar Sharma Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ----------------------11. 01.2012 The petitioner has two grievances for the moment. Though in compliance of orders of this Court, his position as Reader has been restored, the deductions and deprivation of remuneration in the meantime has not been made good. A calculation chart has been annexed to the show cause which, according to the petitioner, is incorrect. Firstly, in this regard, the petitioner should immediately file his detailed objection before the Finance Officer of the University who would examine the matter and within one week of the representation being filed, take a decision in that regard and communicate the same to the petitioner failing which this Court would consider initiating contempt proceedings as against the Finance Officer. Petitioners next grievance is even though the University admits that over rupees six lacs is due and ...
Dr. Sarb Narayan Mishra Vs. the State of Bihar and ors
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-11-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 248 of 2009 Dr. Sarb Narayan Mishra Versus The State of Bihar & Ors with Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 250 of 2009 Dr. Bijendra Pathak Versus The State of Bihar & Ors ------------------------ 07. 11.01.2012 The petitioner of MJC No. 248 of 2009 has submitted that similarly placed petitioners moved for contempt in which a direction was given to the University to make payments for 131 days of strike period if the teachers had compensated by giving extra classes and certificate was given in the said regard also to make payments as per the new rules and group insurance @ 12.5%. The grievance of the petitioner that he has now been considered a Reader for fixing his pensionary benefits even though he was a Professor for which he has filed a separate writ application. The stand of the University is that it is ready to make payments to the petitioner considering him that a Professor if the Writ Court so decides ...
Ram Pravesh Singh @ Ram Parwesh Singh Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-11-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.42980 of 2011 Ram Pravesh Singh @ Ram Parwesh Singh S/O Sri Niwash Singh, R/O Mohalla Nirala Path , Baridih Basti, P.O. Baridih, P.S.- Sidhgora, Distt. East Singhbhum ( Jharkhand). Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 2. 11.1.2012. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Giriyak P.S.Case No.9 of 2011/G.R.No.01 of 2011 for the offence punishable under sections 20(b), 21(c), 22(c) and 29 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act. The petitioner has been involved in the present case by reason of the statement given by a co-accused Babloo Prasad from whose possession, the alleged 16.700 kgs. Ganja was recovered. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no recovery has been made from the conscious possession of the petitioner whose name has transpired merely by reason of the statement made by the co-accused Babloo Prasad. Learned counsel fur...
- ‹ Prev
- 211
- 212
- 213
- 214
- 215
- 217
- 218
- 219
- 220
- 221
- Next ›
- Last »