Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Aamir Vs. the State of Bihar

Aamir vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 11, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/975196

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Aamir

Advocate Mr. B.N.P. Singh

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.725 of 2012 aamir versus the state of bihar ---------------------------------- 2/ 11.1.2012 heard mr. b.n.p. singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and dr. indiwar kumar, learned counsel for the state. the petitioner is apprehending his arrest in complaint case no. ca 342.of 2009 in which cognizance has been taken under sections 376, 323 and 504/34 of the indian penal code. it is alleged that initially forceful physical relationship was established by the petitioner with the complainant in march, 2009 and thereafter, on promise to marry, the physical relationship was established. it is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the complaint petition does not reflect that any medical examination of the victim was done. considering the fact that the complainant being major, consented for physical relationship for several months in anticipation of marriage and on account of that the accusation under section 376 ipc getting clouded, let the above named petitioner be released on bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing the bail bond of rs.10000/(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount 2 each to the satisfaction of c.j.m. purnea in the aforementioned complaint case subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the cr.p.c. anil/ (dinesh kumar singh, j.)

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.725 of 2012 Aamir Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 2/ 11.1.2012 Heard Mr. B.N.P. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Dr. Indiwar Kumar, learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in Complaint Case No. CA 342.of 2009 in which cognizance has been taken under sections 376, 323 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that initially forceful physical relationship was established by the petitioner with the complainant in March, 2009 and thereafter, on promise to marry, the physical relationship was established. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the complaint petition does not reflect that any medical examination of the victim was done. Considering the fact that the complainant being major, consented for physical relationship for several months in anticipation of marriage and on account of that the accusation under section 376 IPC getting clouded, let the above named petitioner be released on bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing the bail bond of Rs.10000/(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount 2 each to the satisfaction of C.J.M. Purnea in the aforementioned complaint case subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Anil/ (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial