Patna Court May 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Khodaija Khatoon and anr. Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-12-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.44680 o1. Khodaija Khatoon, W/O-Md. Sahab Sah 2. Md. Sahab Sah, S/O-Late Md. Yakub Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------12. 01.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioners being parents-in-law of the informants daughter are languishing in jail custody since 14.10.2011 in a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 343, 379, 498 A, 386, 468, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It would appear from perusal of the first information report itself, that earlier the victim had filed complaint case for the offences under Section 498 A and other minor Sections of the Indian Penal Code against her in-laws including her husband and in the aforesaid complaint case, she was directed by the learned court below to go to her Sasural and in compliance of the aforesaid direction, she went there but allegedly, she was confined in a room by the ...
Rohit Kumar Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-12-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1864 of 2012 Rohit Kumar Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------12. 01.2012 This is an application for modification of order dated 18.10.2011 passed in Cr.Misc.No. 17241 of 2010 in which petitioner was allowed anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within one month from the date of communication of the order dated 18.10.2011 only after payment of first instalment of Rs. 50,000/-. It is submitted that first instalment of Rs. 50,000/- has been deposited by the petitioner. However, petitioner prays for extension of time for payment of rest amount of Rs. 4,50,000/- in nine equal monthly instalments. The prayer is allowed. Petitioner is directed to make payment of rest amount in equal monthly instalments after three months from the date of communication of this Order. The order dated 18.10.2011 is modified to the extent indicated above. Let this order including the or...
Mukhtar Singh Yadav @ Mukhtar Yadav Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-12-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.895 of 2012 ====================================================== Mukhtar Singh Yadav @ Mukhtar Yadav .... .... Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party =====================================================12. 01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 307, 504 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 27 of the Arms Act and Section 3(I) (X) of the SC/ST. (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. It is alleged against the petitioner to have fired which hit none. Though, it is also alleged against the petitioner to have assaulted with the butt of the firearm as a result of which the informant received bleeding injury. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that it was the informants side who committed theft in the pond of the petitioner for which the petitioners side lodged a ...
Shambhu Kumar and anr. Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-12-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.43513 o1. Shambhu Kumar, son of Shital Prasad, R/O Marufganj P.S. Malsalami, Distt. Patna 2. Chandra Shekhar Kumar, son of Ram Prasad Rai, R/O. Village-Rampur, P.S. Raghopur Town, District-Vaishali. Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 2. 12.1.2012. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioners are in custody in connection with Alamganj P.S.Case No.259 of 2011 for the offence punishable under sections 467, 468, 471, 420, 272, 273 of the Indian Penal Code and section 16 (a) (1) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954. The petitioners herein have been charged with indulging in the process of preparation of adulterated Ghee. Learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that the petitioners are mere employees working under one Sanjay Kumar. He further submits that although the product in question has not been found to be of standard but was not dangerous to life. He further submits ...
Surendra Prasad Mishra Vs. the State of Bihar and ors
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-12-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1417 of 2009 Surendra Prasad Mishra Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors ---------------------------------- 02. 12.01.2012 Counsel for the petitioner, State as well as the Accountant General are present. The application was lodged in this Court in the year 2009 seeking payment of post retiral dues. Two counter affidavits have been filed on behalf of the Provident Fund Officer, Saharsa as well as the Accountant General; from perusal whereof it appears that during the pendency of the application the amount found payable to the petitioner under the head GPF has already been authorized and paid. From the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the Accountant General it would appear that the petitioner has been provided with pension payment order as well as the amount payable on commutation of pension. Learned counsel submits that no counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of other respondent with regard to payment of leave...
Mostt.Sarswati Devi Vs. the State of Bihar and ors
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-12-2012
Patna High Court CWJC No.588 of 2012 (2) dt.12-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.588 of 2012 ====================================================== Mostt.Sarswati Devi .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amaresh Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Neeraj Nandan Gp20 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL12. 01-2012 Both sides present. Learned counsel for the petitioner would place on record the order passed on his earlier writ petition being C.W.J.C. No. 790 of 2005 within 10 days by filing supplementary affidavit. Learned A.C. to G.P. 20 submits that the matter be adjourned enabling the respondents to file counter affidavit. As prayed, let counter affidavit, if any, be filed within...
Pramod Prasad Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-12-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.931 of 2012 Pramod Prasad Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 02. 12.01.2012 Petitioner being fertilizer dealer is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences under Sections 420, 406 of the I.P.C. and Section 3(iii) of the Fertilizer Control Act. It is alleged that instead of 93 bags only 86 bags of fertilizer were found in the stock. It is also alleged that petitioner was selling fertilizer at higher price than the prescribed price. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that inspection was made in the afternoon and no consumer has made accusations as levelled in the F.I.R. and the license of the petitioner has already been suspended. Considering the nature of accusation and the fact that fertilizer dealer license of the petitioner has been suspended, let the petitioner namely Pramod Prasad, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a...
Md. Sohrab @ Sohrab Khan Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-12-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.926 of 2012 Md. Sohrab @ Sohrab Khan Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- with Criminal Miscellaneous No.1781 of 2012 Md. Shamshad @ Shamshad Ahmad @ Simmo Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 02. 12.01.2012 Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences under Section of the Explosive Substances Act. During the raid two persons were apprehended, from one of them two country made live bombs and five containers of tobacco were recovered which were to be used to prepare bombs. The apprehended accused persons disclosed the name of the petitioners. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners have no criminal antecedent and the statement to that effect have been made in para 8 and 11 of the petitions. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioners namely 1. Md. Sohrab @ Sohrab Khan 2. Md. Shamshad @ Shamshad Ahma...
Afroz Ahmad Vs. State of Bihar and anr
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-12-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.40236 of 2010 Afroz Ahmad, son of Late Dr. Mauladin, resident of hasanpura Bara Mohalla, P.S. M.H. Nagar, District Siwan. ----- Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Kainat Nesha, wife of Afroz Ahmad, daughter of Abdul Sattar Mansoori, resident of village Hasanpura Bara Mohalla, P.S. M.H. Nagar, District Siwan. At present D/o Abdul Sattar Mansoori, Resident of village Nabiganj, P.O. + P.S. Barharia, District Siwan. --------Opposite Parties. ******** 05. 12.01.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner, apprehends his arrest in connection with Hussanganj (M.H. Nagar) P.S. Case No. 148/2010 for the offences under Section 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code, is one of the named accused in this case instituted on the basis complaint case no. 1903/2010 being husband of the complainant informant with allegation of demand of dowry, torture etc. and als...
Md. Nazeem @ Md.Nayeem Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-12-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.44686 of 2011 Md. Nazeem @ Md.Nayeem, S/O-Noor Mohammad Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------12. 01.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is in jail custody since 31.08.2011 in a case registered under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. Although, petitioner is said to have been caught at the spot but according to prosecution case itself, nothing was recovered from conscious possession of the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Railway Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra in connection with Muzaffarpur Rail P.S. Case No. 44 of 2011. SHAHZAD ( Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)...
- ‹ Prev
- 184
- 185
- 186
- 187
- 188
- 190
- 191
- 192
- 193
- 194
- Next ›
- Last »