Patna Court May 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Surendra Kewat Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1817 of 2012 Surendra Kewat Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 2/ 13/01/2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional P.P. for the State. Petitioner, Surendra Kewat happens to be named in a complaint case no. 418/2009 which happens to be the basis of registration of Bind P.S. Case No. 51/2008 wherein he carries an omnibus allegation to the effect that he along with other co- accused assaulted Ramashis Kewat with small iron rod and for that the deceased was shifted to hospital where in course of treatment he succumbed. After concluding investigation, petitioner was not sent up for trial though differing there- from learned Chief Judicial Magistrate also summoned him to face trial. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, as well as taking into account paragraph-4 of the complaint petition, petitioner, Surendra Kewat is directed to be released in the event of arrest/surren...
Om Prakash Singh @ Munna Singh Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.41665 of 2011 Om Prakash Singh @ Munna Singh Versus The State Of Bihar ------- 03/ 13.01.2012 None appears on behalf of the petitioner on repeated call. It came to my notice that earlier petitioner had filed bail petition twice before this court but the aforesaid fact has been suppressed in this bail petition. In the aforesaid circumstances, call for record of Cr. Misc. no.33478/2011 disposed off on 28.11.2011, record of Cr. Misc. no.18725/2011 disposed off on 3.8.2011 and record of Cr. Misc. no.9857/2011 disposed off on 13.5.2011 and also call for attested Photostat copy of the original FIR of Bikram P.S. Case no.207/2010 as well as Bikram P.S. Case no.107/2010 from the court of the Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur within one week from the date of receipt of the order. List this matter on 31.1.2012 retaining its original position. Let this order be communicated to the ACJM, Danapur through FAX at the cost of th...
Raju Kumar Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.43493 of 2011 Raju Kumar son of Late Shyam Narayan Sao, resident of village Sadikpur, P.S.Maner, District- Patna Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 2. 13.1.2012. Heard learned counsel for the parties. Call for the legible carbon copy of the case diary of Maner P.S.Case No.183 of 2011 from the court of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur and put up on receipt thereof. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Maner P.S.Case No.183 of 2011 for the offence punishable under sections 363, 365, 366A/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner, with reference to an interview call letter placed at Annexure-5 of the supplementary affidavit issued from the Railway Recruitment Cell, East Central Railway, Polson Complex, Dighaghat, Patna requiring the petitioner to present himself on 25.1.2012 for verification of his papers for appointment under the Railway, prays fo...
Jagarnath Sahni Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.35278 of 2011 Jagarnath Sahni, S/O-Late Laldhar Sahni Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------13. 01.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been made accused in this case on mere suspicion and none has seen the actual killing of the deceased nor the petitioner was seen in the company of the deceased prior to the alleged occurrence. It is further submitted by him that so far as recovery of alleged locket is concerned, the same is of general nature and easily available in the market. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi in conne...
Shiv Kant Jha and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar and anr.
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.32646 of 2011 Shiv Kant Jha & Ors. Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr. ---------------------------------- 2. 13.1.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to make necessary correction in paragraph 1 and prayer portion of the application. According to the petitioners all the allegations has not taken place in public place rather the same has taken place inside the house. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that offences under sections 3(1) (X) of the S.C. S.T. Act is not made out. Issue notice to opposite party no.2 under ordinary course as well as registered post with A/D for which requisites etc. must be filed within a period of two weeks, failing which this application as against him shall stand rejected without further reference to the Bench. Vinay/ ( Shivaji Pandey, J.)...
Md.ibrahim Vs. State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Appeal (DB) No.756 of 2008 Md.Ibrahim Versus State of Bihar ---------------13. 01.2012 I.A. No.21 of 2012 This interlocutory application has been filed for grant of bail of Md. Ibrahim the sole-appellant. In view of the observations made in order dated 14.11.2008 it is clear that appellant has been in custody for over 7 years. Other co-accused have already been released on bail. There is no likelihood of appeal being heard at an early date. Considering the aforesaid, during pendency of this appeal, let the appellant, Md. Ibrahim be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of 5 th Additional Sessions Judge, Bettiah (West Champaran) in Sessions Trial No.13/2004 and realization of fine shall also remain stayed. This interlocutory application is, accordingly, disposed of. (Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.) Trivedi/ (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.)...
Mosafir Singh @ Musafir Singh and anr. Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.43155 of 2011 Mosafir Singh @ Musafir Singh son of Shri Jagdeo Singh Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 2. 13.1.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Considering that the petitioner is the father-in-law of the informant, let the petitioner above named be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks from today in connection with Mofassil P.S. case No.119 of 2011 on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as also conditions (i) That one of the bailor will...
Shiv Kumar @ Sheo Kumar Vs. State of Bihar and anr
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.19200 of 2010 Shiv Kumar @ Sheo Kumar Versus State Of Bihar & Anr ---------------------------------- 3. 13.01.2012 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to furnish the present and correct address of the opposite party no.2 in course of the day. Let notices be served on the correct address to the Opposite Party No.2 under Registered cover with A.D. Let ordinary process of notice also be served upon the complainant through his counsel appearing before the learned Court below through the office of the learned Court below. In the event that no counsel is appearing, let the notice be kept on the record of the learned lower Court for being served upon the complainant as and when he appears. Requisites for the above must be filed within two weeks. Post this matter after service of notice. ( Vikash Jain, J.) Fahad....
Hira Lal Kewat Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1164 of 2012 ====================================================== Hira Lal Kewat .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s =====================================================13. 01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the husband is apprehending his arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The petitioner is ready to keep the complainant as wife with full dignity and honour. Considering the stand of the petitioner, let the above named petitioner be released on provisional anticipatory bail for one year in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing the bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfacti...
Ram Balak Yadav and anr Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.36389 o1. Ram Balak Yadav, S/O-Rajo Yadav 2. Pramod Yadav, S/O-Rajo Yadav Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------13. 01.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. There is specific allegation of firing against these petitioners but submission on behalf of the petitioners is that except the informant none has claimed to have seen the alleged crime and, as a matter of fact, petitioners have been implicated in this case on account of previous enmity. Regard being had to the facts and circumstances of the case as well as submissions of the parties, I am not inclined to release the petitioners on bail. Accordingly, their prayer for bail in connection with Sessions Trial No. 438 of 2011 arising out of Kotwali P.S. Case No. 56 of 2011 pending in the court of Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court-II, Munger is, hereby, rejected. However...
- ‹ Prev
- 166
- 167
- 168
- 169
- 170
- 172
- 173
- 174
- 175
- 176
- Next ›
- Last »