Patna Court May 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Upendra Pd. Yadav @ Upendra Yadav and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1113 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Upendra Pd. Yadav @ Upendra Yadav.2. Ramdeo Yadav.3. Arun Kumar Ray. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s =====================================================13. 01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Section 409 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that the grains were supplied in connection with S.G.R. Scheme in the year 2003-05 but they were not distributed to the consumers. The alleged amount due against the petitioner no.1 is Rs. 4,20,000/-, against petitioner no.2 is Rs. 4,53,642/- and against petitioner no.3 is Rs. 10,40,452. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that grains were distributed on the directions of the officers, hence the petitioners only cannot be responsible for the alle...
Jiyalal Das and ors Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1124 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Jiyalal Das 2. Sanjay Das.3. Viren Das @ Virendar Das .... .... Petitioners Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party =====================================================13. 01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 302, 201 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. Though, the petitioners are named in the F.I.R., but it appears that the informant is not the witness to the occurrence and other accused persons have been named in the F.I.R. on mere suspicion. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have been made accused only on suspicion due to previous enmity. It is also submitted that the inquest report as well as postmortem report reflect that the victim died due to committing suicide by hanging and consid...
Sakuntala Devi Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.182 of 2012 Sakuntala Devi Versus The State Of Bihar 2. 13.01.2012. Heard Mr. Arbind Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. A. L. Pandit, learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 26.08.2011 in a case registered for the offence under Sections 498(A), 304(B/34 of the I.P.C. and 3/5 of the D. P. Act. It appears that police submitted final form finding the accusation false but differing with the same cognizance has been taken against the petitioner under Sections 306, 498(A)/34 of the I.P.C. and of the D. P. Act. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M. Ist Class, Jehanabad, in connection with Jehanabad P.S. Case No. 372 of 2009. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)...
Santosh Kumar and ors Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No. 43234 o1. Santosh Kumar, S/o Bhola Bhagat, Resident of Village - Bahuara Bhan, P.S. - Madhuban, District - East Champaran At Motihari.2. Bhola Bhagat, S/o Late Ramautar Bhagat, Resident of Village - Bahuara Bhan, P.S. - Madhuban, District - East Champaran At Motihari.3. Manoj Bhagat @ Manoj Kumar, S/o Batahu Bhagat Resident of Village - Bhagwanpur, P.S. - Madhuban, District - East Champaran At Motihari. Versus 1. The State of Bihar ------------------- 02. 13.01.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 272, 273 and 485/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 47(A)(D)(F) of Excise Act. Considering that there is no direct material against the petitioners who have fair antecedents, let the petitioners, above named be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a ...
Asharfi Mahto Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.33676 of 2011 Asharfi Mahto, S/O-Late Jitu Mahto Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------13. 01.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is in jail custody since 10.06.2011 in a case registered under Sections 406, 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Admittedly, petitioner is owner of line hotel and it is stated that driver of the vehicle had given the amount in question to the petitioner as well as his grandson but nothing has been recovered either from possession or from house of the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur (West) in connection with Kurhani (Fak...
Pratap Narayan Mishra Vs. the State of Bihar and anr
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.10583 of 2010 Pratap Narayan Mishra Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr ---------------------------------- 4. 13.01.2012 The petitioner was directed by the order dated 22.12.2011 to take proper steps in the matter of service of notices, in view of the earlier notices not having been served on the opposite party no.2 who was reported as not residing at the address given. The petitioner is directed to take steps for fresh service of notice by Registered cover with A.D to the Opposite Party No. 2 at the present and correct address, if ascertainable by the petitioner. Let ordinary process of notice also be served upon the complainant through his counsel appearing before the learned Court below through the office of the learned Court below. In the event that no counsel is appearing, let the notice be kept on the record of the learned lower Court for being served upon the complainant as and when he appears. Requisites for the abo...
Md. Saddam @ Md. Saddam Ansari Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.68 of 2012 Md. Saddam @ Md. Saddam Ansari Versus The State Of Bihar 2. 13.01.2012. Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 17.07.2011 in a case registered for the offence under Section 376/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is of committing rape by two accused including the petitioner. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the occurrence is of 15.07.2011 and the F.I.R. was lodged on 16.07.2011 and the victim was medically examined on 17.07.2011 which completely negates the prosecution accusation. Moreover, no resisting injury has been found on the victims body and father of the victim has admitted that the victim is suffering from some mental abnormality. Considering the medical evidence which negates the prosecution case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) w...
Safakat Ansari Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1052 of 2012 ====================================================== Safakat Ansari, son of Shekhawath Ansari. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s =====================================================13. 01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that on 26.01.2011, the petitioner established forceful physical relationship with the complainant for which the complaint was filed on 05.02.2011. The delay for lodging of the complaint has been given in the complaint petition that there was some hope of Panchayati. It appears from the complaint that no medication examination of the victim girl has been done. The delayed lodging of the complaint clouds the bona fide of the accusation coupled with the non-examinatio...
Sanjay Kumar Vs. the State of Bihar and anr
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.2085 of 2012 Sanjay Kumar Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr ---------------------------------13. 01.2012 This is an application for modification of order dated 10.8.2011 passed in Cr.Misc.No. 43946 of 2010 in which petitioner was allowed anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within one month from the date of communication of the order dated 10.8.2011. However, it is submitted that the petitioner failed to surrender in the prescribed time for the reasons that during that period petitioner could not be communicated the order of this Court by his advocate. As such, petitioner prays for extension of time. Accordingly, the prayer made in the modification application is allowed and four weeks further time from the date of communication of this order is granted to the petitioners to surrender in the court below and thereafter they will be released on bail. The order dated 10.8.2011 is modif...
Sandhya Devi Vs. Santosh Singh
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-13-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Appeal No.510 of 2010 Sandhya Devi wife of Santosh Singh, resident of Sangita Bhawan, Mohalla: Sati Asthan, Post and Police Station: Masaurhi, District: Patna at present residing with her father namely Navlesh Singh at her fathers place at village: Bairia, PS Wazirganj, District Gaya ....Appellant Versus Santosh Singh son of Kameshwar Prasad Singh, resident of Sangita Bhawan, Mohalla: Sati Asthan, Post and Police Station: Masaurhi, District Patna .....Respondent ---------------------------------- For the appellant: Mr. Kumar Dhirendra Pratap Singh, advocate For the Respondent: Mr. Mahendra Prasad Bhartee, advocate Mr. S. K. Bhartee, advocate ------------------------------13. 01-2012 Heard the parties.2. This appeal is directed against the judgement dated 24-5-2010 and decree dated 1-6-2010 passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Patna in Matrimonial case no. 532/2007 preferred by the husband petitioner who is respondent he...
- ‹ Prev
- 162
- 163
- 164
- 165
- 166
- 168
- 169
- 170
- 171
- 172
- Next ›
- Last »