Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sakuntala Devi Vs. the State of Bihar

Sakuntala Devi vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 13, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/974770

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sakuntala Devi

Advocate Mr. Arbind Kumar

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.182 of 2012 sakuntala devi versus the state of bihar 2. 13.01.2012. heard mr. arbind kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and mr. a. l. pandit, learned a.p.p. for the state. the petitioner is languishing in custody since 26.08.2011 in a case registered for the offence under sections 498(a), 304(b/34 of the i.p.c. and 3/5 of the d. p. act. it appears that police submitted final form finding the accusation false but differing with the same cognizance has been taken against the petitioner under sections 306, 498(a)/34 of the i.p.c. and of the d. p. act. considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned j.m. ist class, jehanabad, in connection with jehanabad p.s. case no. 372 of 2009. u. k. ( dinesh kumar singh, j)

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.182 of 2012 Sakuntala Devi Versus The State Of Bihar 2. 13.01.2012. Heard Mr. Arbind Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. A. L. Pandit, learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 26.08.2011 in a case registered for the offence under Sections 498(A), 304(B/34 of the I.P.C. and 3/5 of the D. P. Act. It appears that police submitted final form finding the accusation false but differing with the same cognizance has been taken against the petitioner under Sections 306, 498(A)/34 of the I.P.C. and of the D. P. Act. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M. Ist Class, Jehanabad, in connection with Jehanabad P.S. Case No. 372 of 2009. U. K. ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial