Patna Court May 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Gauri Sah Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-25-2012
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2958 of 2012 (2) dt.25-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.2958 of 2012 ====================================================== Gauri Sah, son of Late Ashok Sah, resident of Village- Bhawanipur, Tola Telihari, Police Station- Bhawanipur, District- Purnea. .... .... Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party. CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL PRASAD ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPAL PRASAD25. 01-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with Gopalpur (Rangra) P.S. Case No. 101 of 2011, registered under Sections 498 A, 323 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. This case with regard to offence under Section 498 A of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is in custody since 15. 07. 2011. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petiti...
Jagdamba Devi Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-25-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.2530 of 2012 ====================================================== Jagdamba Devi .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH25. 01-2012 Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 325, 308 of the I.P.C. It is alleged that due to the fight between children of both sides, petitioner made assault and ultimately pierced stick into the eye of the grand daughter of the informant. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that for the occurrence of 03.09.2011 the F.I.R. was lodged on 16.09.2011 and the order of the Sessions Judge reflects that final injury report has not been brought on record till date. Delayed lodging of the F.I.R. clouds the bona fide of the accus...
Chandra Prakash and anr Vs. the State of Bihar and ors
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-25-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.69 of 2012 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 2777 of 2011 With Interlocutory application No. 535 of 2012 In Letters Patent Appeal No. 69 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Chandra Prakash, Son of Shri Narayan Kumar Verma, Resident of Village - Mohalla Chandmari Ekawana, Po & Police Station - Motihari, District - East Champaran 2. Santosh Kumar Singh, Son of Late Sundar Prasad Singh, Resident of Village - Savera Sadan, Road No. 1, Postal Park, Police Station - Kankarbagh, District - Patan .... .... Intervener Petitioners-Appellants Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Department of Transport, Government of Bihar, Patna 2. The Bihar Staff Selection Commission through its Secretary, Veterinary College, Patna - 800014 3. The Secretary, Bihar Staff Selection Commission through its Secretary, Veterinary College, Patna - 800014 Respondents/Respondents.4. Ranjeet Kumar Singh @ Ranj...
Kesho Manjhi Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-25-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No. 2941 of 2012 Kesho Manjhi, Son of Late Aklu Manjhi, resident of village Bijaypur, P. S. Pakaribarawan, District Nawadah. ............... Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar .............. Opp. Party. ---------------------------------- 02/ 25.01.2012 Heard. This is a petition for regular bail for the offence under Sections 406 and 420/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation against the petitioner is that he misrepresented Savita Devi as wife of Karu Manjhi who happens to be daughter of the petitioner, whereas Savita Devi and Karu Manjhi are the daughter and son of the petitioner and Karu Manjhi is a minor but he represented Savita Devi as wife of Karu Manjhi for getting the benefit of Indira Awas. However, taking into consideration the custody of the petitioner since 29.10.2011, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like am...
Dinesh Malakar Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-25-2012
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.845 of 2012 (2) dt.25-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.845 of 2012 ====================================================== Dinesh Malakar, S/O-Gorakh Malakar .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA25. 01-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Earlier the prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected by this Court vide order dated 15.03.2011 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 2783 of 2011 with liberty to petitioner to renew his prayer for bail, if his trial is not concluded within nine months. Learned counsel for the petitioner points out that up- till-now only one prosecution witness has been examin...
Rani Kumari Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-25-2012
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2578 of 2012 (2) dt.25-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.2578 of 2012 ====================================================== Rani Kumari .... .... Petitioner. Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH25. 01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner is apprehending her arrest in a case registered under Sections 419 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code and 10 of the Bihar Examination Act. It is alleged that one Dharamshila Kumari appeared in matriculation examination in place of petitioner. It is submitted that the petitioner was not aware about Dharamshila Kumari being appearing in her place. Considering the fact that the petitioner is a lady and student, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail in the eve...
Ranjeet Ram Vs. the State of Bihar and anr
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-25-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.2305 of 2012 ====================================================== Ranjeet Ram .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH25. 01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the husband is apprehending his arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The petitioner is ready to keep the complainant as wife with full dignity and honour, hence the accusation is not being deliberated. Considering the stand of the petitioner, let the above named petitioner be released on provisional anticipatory bail for one year in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below w...
Dwarika Chaudhary and anr. Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-25-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.2419 of 2012 ====================================================== Dwarika Chaudhary & Anr. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH25. 01-2012 Petitioners being uncle and daughter of the sister of the husband are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences under Sections 304B/34 of the I.P.C. and Section of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Accusation is of killing the victim for non- fulfilment of dowry demand within seven years of the marriage. It is submitted that though there is accusation of demand of dowry and torture against the entire family including the petitioners but the specific accusation of demand of dowry and removing the victim from the house is against the husband. Considering the aforesaid fa...
Parmanand Sah Vs. State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-25-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Appeal (DB) No 1004 of 2010 ====================================================== Parmanand Sah .... .... Appellant/s Versus State Of Bihar .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONBLE MR JUSTICE NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH and HONBLE MR JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONBLE MR JUSTICE NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH25. 01-2012 I A No 72 of 2012 Considering the fact that the appellant is a man approaching 70 years of age and has been in custody for over four years and he happens to be the father of Munna, the main person behind this crime, let the appellant abovenamed be released on bail on his furnishing bonds of Rs 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No V, Gopalganj in Sessions Trial No 2 of 2009/19 of 2009. I A No 72 of 2012 stands disposed of. (Navaniti Prasad Singh) M.E.H./- (Ashwa...
Brijesh Giri Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-25-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.2415 of 2012 ====================================================== Brijesh Giri .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH25. 01-2012 Petitioner being husband is apprehending his arrest in a complaint case in which cognizance has been taken under Section 498A of the I.P.C. The marriage was performed in 1998 and out of the wedlock there is a female child also. Learned counsel for the complainant, on instruction submits that reconciliation is not possible, though suggestion was given before learned Court below with regard to payment of maintenance, but it was not accepted by the petitioner. Petitioner is ready to pay Rs. 2000/- from March, 2012 by depositing the same in the account of the complainant by second week of every mont...
- ‹ Prev
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- Next ›
- Last »