Madhya Pradesh Court July 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rajkumar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-01-2013
1 Writ Petition No.10425/2012 01.07.2013 Shri Dharmendra Soni, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Tabrej Sheikh, Advocate for the respondent No.3. I.A.No.8179/2013 for issuance of direction to the respondent no.3 for declaration of result. It is submitted by Shri Soni that in an identical matter directions have been issued on 10.6.2013 for declaration of result. Similar direction may also be issued in the present case. It is also submitted by Shri Soni that after declaration of result if petitioner is found entitled for admission in the second semester, respondents may be directed to accept their forMs.as last date for filing of the form even with late fees has expired on 29.6.2013. Though prayer is opposed, but considering the fact that in W.P.No.9967/2012, a Division Bench of this Court on 10.6.2013 has directed for declaration of result, we direct that the aforesaid direction shall be applicable in the present case as far as they are applicable. After declaration of result by the res...
Hirendra Kumar Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-01-2013
W.P.No.10794/2013 Hirendra Kumar Singh vs. State of M.P. & ORS.1 01.07.2013 Heard Shri Harish Agnihotri, learned counsel for the petitioner, on the question of admission and interim relief. The petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by order dated 6.6.2013 by which the order of posting of the petitioner dated 23.8.2011 has been modified and the petitioner has been posted at Government Higher Secondary School Ghulghuli, District Umaria. It is however apparent that the petitioner has already approached the Commissioner, Shahdol Division, Shahdol by filing a representation for mitigation of his grievance. In the circumstances, as the petitioner had already approached the competent authority by filing a representation, without entering into the merits of the case or making any comments upon the entitlement of the petitioner, the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with a direction to the respondent Commissioner, Shahdol to consider and decide the petitioner's repr...
Shri Santosh Kumar Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-01-2013
W.P.No.10981/2013 (S.K.Singh versus State of MP and otheRs.01.07.2013 Heard Shri R.B.Gautam, learned counsel for the petitioner on the question of admission and interim relief. The petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by order dated 10.06.2013 by which he has been transferred from STC Division Satna to O & M Division Amarpatan. The petitioner alleges that he has been transferred in violation of the transfer policy. It is also submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has filed a representation Annexure P/4 before the respondents/authorities. In view of the aforesaid, without entering into the merits of the case the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with a direction to the effect that in case the petitioner files a copy of the order passed today along with a copy of the petition before the authority concerned within a week, the representation Annexure P/4 shall be considered and decided by the authority concerned in accordance wi...
Anuradha Shukla Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-01-2013
1 Writ Petition No.12747/2012 01.07.2013 Shri Dharmendra Soni, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Tabrej Sheikh, Advocate for the respondent No.3. I.A.No.8594/2013 for issuance of direction to the respondent no.3 for declaration of result. It is submitted by Shri Soni that in an identical matter directions have been issued on 10.6.2013 for declaration of result. Similar direction may also be issued in the present case. It is also submitted by Shri Soni that after declaration of result if petitioner is found entitled for admission in the second semester, respondents may be directed to accept their forMs.as last date for filing of the form even with late fees has expired on 29.6.2013. Though prayer is opposed, but considering the fact that in W.P.No.9967/2012, a Division Bench of this Court on 10.6.2013 has directed for declaration of result, we direct that the aforesaid direction shall be applicable in the present case as far as they are applicable. After declaration of result by the res...
Sanjay Kumar Vishwakarma Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-01-2013
W.P.No.9956/2013 Sanjay Kumar Vishwakarma vs. State of M.P. & ORS.1 01.07.2013 Heard Shri Uday Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, on the question of admission. The petitioner has filed this petition on the allegation that though the petitioner is qualified for appointment on the post of Samvida Shala Shikshak Grade-3, his candidature has been wrongly rejected on the ground that he has passed Higher Secondary School Certificate Examination in the third division whereas he has infact passed in the second division. It is submitted that the petitioner has filed a representation before the respondent authorities on 7.5.2013 which has not been considered. In view of the aforesaid, as the petitioner has already approached the competent authority and the matter is required to be looked into on facts which cannot be done under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to pursue the representation fi...
Sharda Prasad Pandey Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-01-2013
W.P.No.10569/13 (S.P.Pandey versus State MP and otheRs.01.07.2013 Heard Shri D.K.Dixit, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri B.P.Pandey, learned G.A.for the State on advance copy on the question of admission. The petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by the fact that the respondents/authorities by relying upon the circular dated 3.11.2012 has rejected the claim of the petitioner, who is a handicapped candidate for appointment on the post of Samvida Shala Shikshak Grade-III on the ground that he has crossed the upper age limit of 45 yeaRs.It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the circular dated 03.11.2012 does not apply to the handicapped persons who are even otherwise entitled to the benefit of age relaxation under the provisions of Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act (1 of 1996).From a perusal of the impugned order it appears that the authorities have rejected the claim of the pet...
Vishwakarma Vs. South Eastern Coal Fields Limited
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-01-2013
1...W.A.No.585 of 2013 Vishwakarma South Easter Coal Fields LTD.& ORS.01.07.2013 Shri K.C.Ghildiyal, Counsel for the appellant. Shri Greeshm Jain, Counsel for respondents. This appeal is directed against an order dated 30.5.2013 passed in W.P.9182 of 2013 by which a writ petition preferred by the appellant against issuance of charge-sheet was disposed of finally with a direction to the competent authority to extend an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and to decide the question on the basis of the reply filed by the appellant, by passing a reasoned order. This order has been assailed by the appellant on the ground that the charge-sheet was only in respect of non- furnishing of the original mark-sheet of matriculation certificate. It is submitted by the appellant that along with the reply, the requisite document was filed but inspite of this the respondents have proceeded in the departmental proceedings. It appears that the respondents have made up their mind to terminate the ser...
- ‹ Prev
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 71
- 72
- 73
- 74
- Next ›