Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Hirendra Kumar Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Hirendra Kumar Singh vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Jul 01, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1045073

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Hirendra Kumar Singh

Advocate Shri. Harish Agnihotri

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

w.p.no.10794/2013 hirendra kumar singh vs. state of m.p. & ors.1 01.07.2013 heard shri harish agnihotri, learned counsel for the petitioner, on the question of admission and interim relief. the petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by order dated 6.6.2013 by which the order of posting of the petitioner dated 23.8.2011 has been modified and the petitioner has been posted at government higher secondary school ghulghuli, district umaria. it is however apparent that the petitioner has already approached the commissioner, shahdol division, shahdol by filing a representation for mitigation of his grievance. in the circumstances, as the petitioner had already approached the competent authority by filing a representation, without entering into the merits of the case or making any comments upon the entitlement of the petitioner, the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with a direction to the respondent commissioner, shahdol to consider and decide the petitioner's representation expeditiously in accordance with law. to enable the authority to do so, a copy of the order passed today alongwith a copy of the petition be served on the authority by the petitioner. the petitioner would also be at liberty to w.p.no.10794/2013 hirendra kumar singh vs. state of m.p. & ors.2 obtain interim orders from the commissioner, shahdol by filing an appropriate application for the same. with the aforesaid direction, the petition, filed by the petitioner, stands disposed of. c.c as per rules. ( r.s.jha ) judge mms/-

Full Judgment

W.P.No.10794/2013 Hirendra Kumar Singh vs. State of M.P. & ORS.1 01.07.2013 Heard Shri Harish Agnihotri, learned counsel for the petitioner, on the question of admission and interim relief.

The petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by order dated 6.6.2013 by which the order of posting of the petitioner dated 23.8.2011 has been modified and the petitioner has been posted at Government Higher Secondary School Ghulghuli, District Umaria.

It is however apparent that the petitioner has already approached the Commissioner, Shahdol Division, Shahdol by filing a representation for mitigation of his grievance.

In the circumstances, as the petitioner had already approached the competent authority by filing a representation, without entering into the merits of the case or making any comments upon the entitlement of the petitioner, the petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with a direction to the respondent Commissioner, Shahdol to consider and decide the petitioner's representation expeditiously in accordance with law.

To enable the authority to do so, a copy of the order passed today alongwith a copy of the petition be served on the authority by the petitioner.

The petitioner would also be at liberty to W.P.No.10794/2013 Hirendra Kumar Singh vs. State of M.P. & ORS.2 obtain interim orders from the Commissioner, Shahdol by filing an appropriate application for the same.

With the aforesaid direction, the petition, filed by the petitioner, stands disposed of.

C.C as per rules.

( R.S.JHA ) JUDGE mms/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial