Rajkumar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Rajkumar vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Jul 01, 2013

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1045065

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1045065
Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On: Jul 01, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rajkumar

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

1 writ petition no.10425/2012 01.07.2013 shri dharmendra soni, advocate for the petitioner. shri tabrej sheikh, advocate for the respondent no.3. i.a.no.8179/2013 for issuance of direction to the respondent no.3 for declaration of result. it is submitted by shri soni that in an identical matter directions have been issued on 10.6.2013 for declaration of result. similar direction may also be issued in the present case. it is also submitted by shri soni that after declaration of result if petitioner is found entitled for admission in the second semester, respondents may be directed to accept their forms.as last date for filing of the form even with late fees has expired on 29.6.2013. though prayer is opposed, but considering the fact that in w.p.no.9967/2012, a division bench of this court on 10.6.2013 has directed for declaration of result, we direct that the aforesaid direction shall be applicable in the present case as far as they are applicable. after declaration of result by the respondents within a period of one week from today, if petitioner is found entitled for admission in the second semester, the respondents shall permit the petitioner to submit his form within a period of two weeks from today for admission in the second semester. be listed for hearing along with w.p.no.12188/2012, w.p.no.9960/2012 and w.p.no.9967/2012 in the second week of august, 2013. certified copy as per rules. (krishn kumar lahoti) (subhash kakade) acting chief justice judge hs

Full Judgment

1 Writ Petition No.10425/2012 01.07.2013 Shri Dharmendra Soni, Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Tabrej Sheikh, Advocate for the respondent No.3.

I.A.No.8179/2013 for issuance of direction to the respondent no.3 for declaration of result.

It is submitted by Shri Soni that in an identical matter directions have been issued on 10.6.2013 for declaration of result.

Similar direction may also be issued in the present case.

It is also submitted by Shri Soni that after declaration of result if petitioner is found entitled for admission in the second semester, respondents may be directed to accept their forMs.as last date for filing of the form even with late fees has expired on 29.6.2013.

Though prayer is opposed, but considering the fact that in W.P.No.9967/2012, a Division Bench of this Court on 10.6.2013 has directed for declaration of result, we direct that the aforesaid direction shall be applicable in the present case as far as they are applicable.

After declaration of result by the respondents within a period of one week from today, if petitioner is found entitled for admission in the second semester, the respondents shall permit the petitioner to submit his form within a period of two weeks from today for admission in the second semester.

Be listed for hearing along with W.P.No.12188/2012, W.P.No.9960/2012 and W.P.No.9967/2012 in the second week of August, 2013.

Certified copy as per rules.

(Krishn Kumar Lahoti) (Subhash Kakade) Acting Chief Justice Judge HS

Same Court & Year Madhya Pradesh · 2013 Same Parties Rajkumar vs The State of Madhya Pradesh Same Subject Education