Madhya Pradesh Court April 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dinesh Tiwari Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-02-2013
Criminal Appeal No.666/2006 02.04.2013 Shri V.K.Lakhera, Advocate for the appellant. Ms.Vandana Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer, for the State. I.A.No.5590/2013: This is fourth application under Section 389(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure for suspension of sentence and release on bail to the appellant. It is stated that other co-accused persons Ramesh and Raghvendra were tried by the Sessions Judge though separately and were convicted by the Sessions Judge, but on appeal preferred by both of them as Criminal Appeal No.289/2001, on 19.03.2012 Raghvendra has been acquitted, while conviction of Ramesh has been confirmed by the High Court. Based on this subsequent event, this application has been filed for suspension of sentence and release on bail to appellant Dinesh. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that except PW-6 Vijay Kumar Dubey other eyewitnesses have been turned hostile. PW-6 Vijay Kumar Dubey in para 1 of the examination-in-chief has not stated that appellant had inflicte...
Gurdeep Singh Gambheer Vs. Abdul Mannan Khan
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-02-2013
1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH ; JABALPUR M.A No.3627/2006 Gurdeep Singh Vs. Abdul Mannan Khan and another For the Appellant : Shri Saket Agarwal, Advocate. For the Respondent No.1 : Shri Umesh Trivedi, Advocate. For the Respondent No.2 : Smt Azgari Khan, Advocate. M.A No.4032/2006 Abdul Mannan Khan Vs. Gurdeep Singh and another For the Appellant : Shri Umesh Trivedi, Advocate. For the Respondent No.1 : Shri Saket Agarwal, Advocate. For the Respondent No.2 : Smt Azgari Khan, Advocate. ORDER (02 /04 /2013 ) U.C. Maheshwari,J.This order shall decide aforesaid both Misc. Appeals arising out of the same impugned award filed by the registered owner of the offending vehicle for saddling the liability of the sum of the impugned award and by the respondent No.1 claimant for enhancement of the sum awarded by the tribunal respectively.2. The aforesaid both the appeals have been filed by the respective appellants stated above being aggrieved by the award dated 14.7.06 passed by the MACT, Balaghat...
Ma Narmada Goshala Jablapur Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-02-2013
W.P.No.5576/2013 03/04/2013 Shri Brijesh Choubey, learned counsel for the petitioner. Considering the fact that an application filed by the petitioner for registration of Goshala under the Madhya Pradesh Gopalan Avam Pashudhan Samvardhan Board, Bhopal, M.P.is pending before Respondent No.3, the said respondent is directed to consider and decide the representation/ application of the petitioner in accordance with requirement of law within a period of three weeks' from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, subject to petitioner's complying with the statutory requirement of law. With the aforesaid, the petition stands disposed of. Certified Copy as per rules. (Rajendra Menon) Judge nd...
Mumtaz Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-02-2013
M.Cr.C.No.15294/2012 2.4.2013 Shri R.S. Verma, learned counsel for the applicants. Shri Akhilendra Kumar Singh, learned GA for the State. Still service report of respondent no.2 is awaited. The applicants are apprehending their arrest in connection with criminal case No. 8743/12 registered at Police Station Bilkhiriya, District Betul for the offence punishable under sections 363, 365, 368, 324, 325 and 506 of IPC. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that applicants are falsely implicated in the case. It is further submitted that this case arose from the private complaint wherein warrant of arrest has been issued against the applicants. Learned counsel further submits that in the light of decision of Nirbhay Singh's case a direction may be issued to arresting officer to produce the applicants before the trial Court on the same day. Learned ...
Rajkumar Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-02-2013
M.Cr.C.No.2564/2013 2.4.2013 Shri Harpreet Ruprah, counsel for the applicant. Shri A.K.Singh, GA, for the State. Heard. This is an application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C.The applicant is in custody since 20.2.2013 in connection with Crime No.129/13 registered at Police Station Gadarwara, District Narsinghpur for offence punishable under Sections 379, 401, 120B, 34 of IPC and Section 136 and 137 of Electricity Act, 2003. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case. The alleged offences are triable by Magistrate. The applicant is in jail and trial would take considerable time for its conclusion, therefore, prays for grant of bail to applicant. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer. On due consideration of the contentions raised by the counsel for the parties along with facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the view that it is a fit case for grant of bail ...
Sandeep Bharati Goswami Vs. Secretary the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-02-2013
WRIT PETITION No.13195/20002. 04.2013 None for the petitioner. Shri S.M.Lal, learned Govt. Advocate, for respondents No.1 & 4. Shri Manot Sharma, learned Counsel for respondents No.2 & 3. In terms of order dated 25.02.2013 it is informed by learned Counsel appearing for respondents No.2 and 3 that the petitioner has appeared before the authority of respondents No.2 and 3 and after amicable settlement, has accepted an amount of Rs.31,000/-, which has been paid vide Cheque No.004008 dated 23.03.2013, drawn on Union Bank of India. The petitioner has given in writing on 01.04.2013 that he would withdraw the present writ petition unconditionally. The letter written by the petitioner is taken on record. The petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn in view of the aforesaid settlement. (K.K.Trivedi) Judge Skc...
Rkdf College of Education Vs. National Council for Teacher Education
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-02-2013
W.P.No.2881/2013 02.04.2013 Shri Siddharth Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri K.K.Singh, Advocate for respondents No.1 and 2. Shri Mahendra Pateriya, Advocate for respondent No.3. The petitioner has sought following reliefs:- "a) This Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue appropriate writ/order/direction including a writ of certiorarified mandamus setting aside and quashing the impugned communications/orders dated 27.03.2009, 25.04.2012, 13.08.2009 passed by the respondent NCTE WRC and NCTE HQ Delhi respectively, relating to withdrawal of recognition of the petitioner institution. b) This Hon'ble Court be further pleased to issue appropriate writ/order/direction including a writ of certiorarified mandamus directing the NCTE for conducting physical inspection of the subject premises, as specified in the petition and for issuing appropriate orders for all intent and purposes treating the petitioner as a recognized institution. c) This Hon'ble Court be further pleased to issue appropria...
J.K. Bedi Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-02-2013
WRIT PETITION No.13632/20102. 04.2013 Shri A.P.Shroti, learned Counsel for the petitioner. Shri S.M.Lal, learned Govt. Advocate, for respondents-State. Since there is non-compliance of order passed by this Court in which it was very categorically stipulated on 25.02.2013 that in case additional affidavit is not filed, serious action would be taken against the officer concerned, Additional Chief Secretary of the Department is directed to remain present before this Court on 8th April, 2013. List on 8th April, 2013. A copy of this order be made available to learned Govt. Advocate for communicating the same to the concerned Officer. No further information would be sent by the Registry of this Court to the said officer and he will comply with the order of personal appearance. (K.K.Trivedi) Judge Skc...
Mamta Devi Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-02-2013
M.Cr.C.No.3845/2013 2.4.2013 Shri Siddharth Datt, Advocate for the applicant. Shri R.K.Kesarwani, PL for the State. Admit. Call for the case diary. Issue notice of this admission to respondent No.2. Steps be taken within 7 days by RAD and Ordinary modes. Notice be made returnable within two weeks. Heard on I.A.No.7092/2013, an application for grant of ad-interim anticipatory bail to the applicant. The applicant apprehends her arrest in connection with Complaint Case No.136/2009 (New No.52/2013) pending in the Court of JMFC, Sirmour, District Rewa for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 465, 466, 468 and 471 of the IPC. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is a lady, she has been falsely implicated in this case. The case arose out of a private complaint filed by respondent No.2. Initially, the trial Magistrate granted bail to the applicant, thereafter, respondent No.2 filed a revision and after remand of the case and statement of complainant, the trial Court ...
Uday Raj Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-02-2013
M.Cr.C.No.2284/2013 2.4.2013 Shri Sameer Beohar, counsel for the applicant. Shri R.K.Kesharwani, PL, for the State. Heard. This is an application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C.The applicant is in custody since 27.12.2012 in connection with Crime No.30/2012 registered at Police Station Surkhi, District Sagar for offence punishable under Sections 363, 366, 376 of IPC and Section 4 of Laingik Sarakshan Act. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case. Prosecutrix had gone with the present applicant on her own freewill. She is more than 16 years of age and was a consenting party. She lived with the applicant for about one week but she had not made any complaint in regard to rape to anyone. When she returned back to her parental home, she lodged a false and concocted report against the applicant. The applicant is in jail and trial would take considerable time for its conclusion, therefore, prays for grant of bail to applicant. Learned ...
- ‹ Prev
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 68
- Next ›
- Last »