Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Mumtaz Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Mumtaz vs The State of Madhya Pradesh

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Apr 02, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1047482

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mumtaz

Advocate Shri. R.S. Verma

Respondent

The State of Madhya Pradesh

Excerpt

m.cr.c.no.15294/2012 2.4.2013 shri r.s. verma, learned counsel for the applicants. shri akhilendra kumar singh, learned ga for the state. still service report of respondent no.2 is awaited. the applicants are apprehending their arrest in connection with criminal case no. 8743/12 registered at police station bilkhiriya, district betul for the offence punishable under sections 363, 365, 368, 324, 325 and 506 of ipc. learned counsel for the applicants submits that applicants are falsely implicated in the case. it is further submitted that this case arose from the private complaint wherein warrant of arrest has been issued against the applicants. learned counsel further submits that in the light of decision of nirbhay singh's case a direction may be issued to arresting officer to produce the applicants before the trial court on the same day. learned counsel for the state opposes the application. on due consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the case arose from the private complaint, nothing is required to be seized from the applicants, the application is allowed. in the event of arrest, the arresting officer is directed to produce the applicants immediately before the judicial magistrate first class, bhopal and they be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of rs.25,000/­ (rs. twenty five thousand only) each with one surety in the like amount. the petition is finally disposed of. certified copy as per rules. (g.s.solanki) judge ravi

Full Judgment

M.Cr.C.No.15294/2012 2.4.2013 Shri R.S. Verma, learned counsel for the applicants. Shri Akhilendra Kumar Singh, learned GA for the State. Still service report of respondent no.2 is awaited.

The applicants are apprehending their arrest in connection with criminal case No. 8743/12 registered at Police Station Bilkhiriya, District Betul for the offence punishable under sections 363, 365, 368, 324, 325 and 506 of IPC. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that applicants are falsely implicated in the case. It is further submitted that this case arose from the private complaint wherein warrant of arrest has been issued against the applicants.

Learned counsel further submits that in the light of decision of Nirbhay Singh's case a direction may be issued to arresting officer to produce the applicants before the trial Court on the same day. Learned counsel for the State opposes the application. On due consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the case arose from the private complaint, nothing is required to be seized from the applicants, the application is allowed.

In the event of arrest, the arresting officer is directed to produce the applicants immediately before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Bhopal and they be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/­ (Rs. Twenty five Thousand Only) each with one surety in the like amount.

The petition is finally disposed of.

Certified copy as per rules.

(G.S.Solanki) Judge ravi

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial